Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:28 am
I think it is interesting and I appreciate the time it takes to keep track. I don't post much on these record threads usually but I enjoy reading them.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/
CC's Records of RANKS
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=34368
Page 11 of 13
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:01 am
No way to prove it now but I remember seeing 29 colonels a few days ago.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:08 am
Velvecarrots wrote:No way to prove it now but I remember seeing 29 colonels a few days ago.
That's 9 more than now
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:17 am
Velvecarrots wrote:No way to prove it now but I remember seeing 29 colonels a few days ago.
wow, ok what did i have 27? if you see any changes please post in here, ty
this is with generals, brigadiers, colonels, majors, captains and lieutants, thx
list on page 1
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:18 am
Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1065 Lieutenants-CC record
567 Captains-CC record
120 Majors-CC record
27 Colonels-CC record
7 Brigadiers-CC record
3 Generals-CC record
1 Conquerer
0 Field Marshall
updated
here it is, I have not checked, so sure this needs some work
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:40 am
I just made Skipper - so there's probably at least another 5 on the captains too!!
C.
C.
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:40 pm
I just hit Captain!
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:46 am
dcc1220 wrote:I think it is interesting and I appreciate the time it takes to keep track. I don't post much on these record threads usually but I enjoy reading them.
ok, ty dcc1220
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:56 am
Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1075 Lieutenants-CC record
580 Captains-CC record
120 Majors-CC record
27 Colonels-CC record
7 Brigadiers-CC record
3 Generals-CC record
1 Conquerer
0 Field Marshall
updated
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:03 pm
currently 26Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1075 Lieutenants-CC record
580 Captains-CC record
120 Majors-CC record
27 Colonels-CC record
7 Brigadiers-CC record
3 Generals-CC record
1 Conquerer
0 Field Marshall
updated
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:38 pm
currently 31 colonels. Incredible.
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Uh, 25 colonels. Subtract the ranks higher than Colonel.
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:23 pm
Sorry, lost another colonel ;D
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:49 pm
Wwoody123 wrote:Sorry, lost another colonel ;D
Throw a game and get back down there!
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:29 pm
Are you counting the old rankings? If so I was a major once so I hope you counted me.
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:55 pm
This is new ranks only and the record number is not determined by how many people have reached colonel but by how many players have at least a certain point requirement or higher at an instant in time.
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:42 am
I have to laugh whenever I hear about "inflation" of points.
1) The reason why there's more people above 2000 points? There's more people playing. There's also a lot more people under 2000 points.
2) No matter what, there's never going to be more than 1000 points per player. If there's a whole ton of points going to the top, then there's a bunch of guys stuck at the bottom. For every Colonel, there's at least three cadets and cooks. (wait--never mind this line of reason. The "complete deadbeats" argument can take it apart.
)
but on to my favorite...
3) In a 15-rank system (not counting new recruits)... On the top end, we have a completely unused rank (Field Marshall). On the bottom end, we have roughly a quarter (again, ignoring new recruits) of the population in the bottom two ranks.
How can anyone argue that there need to be less points in the system? I could make a case that there are too few. In a perfect system, the most populous rank would be more towards the middle, not the very bottom.
1) The reason why there's more people above 2000 points? There's more people playing. There's also a lot more people under 2000 points.
2) No matter what, there's never going to be more than 1000 points per player. If there's a whole ton of points going to the top, then there's a bunch of guys stuck at the bottom. For every Colonel, there's at least three cadets and cooks. (wait--never mind this line of reason. The "complete deadbeats" argument can take it apart.
)
but on to my favorite...
3) In a 15-rank system (not counting new recruits)... On the top end, we have a completely unused rank (Field Marshall). On the bottom end, we have roughly a quarter (again, ignoring new recruits) of the population in the bottom two ranks.
How can anyone argue that there need to be less points in the system? I could make a case that there are too few. In a perfect system, the most populous rank would be more towards the middle, not the very bottom.
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:01 am
UCAbears wrote:Are you counting the old rankings? If so I was a major once so I hope you counted me.
I am just counting what is currently on the scoreboard, if it passes any of the all time ranks, then I add it
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:56 am
some work for ya blitz.... 
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:33 pm
firstholliday wrote:some work for ya blitz....
yep, gotta change it all around now, sighsRe: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:19 pm
Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1082 Captains-CC record
592 Majors-CC record
121 Colonels-CC record
31 Brigadiers-CC record
4 Generals-CC record
2 Field Marshalls-CC record
1 Conquerer-CC record
updated
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:21 pm
hey ! you cant post just "updated"Blitzaholic wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1082 Captains-CC record
592 Majors-CC record
121 Colonels-CC record
31 Brigadiers-CC record
4 Generals-CC record
2 Field Marshalls-CC record
1 Conquerer-CC record
updated
. I got warned for that........ btw- we only have 1 Field MarshallRe: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:02 pm
Yeah, and 5 generals...
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:07 pm
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:hey ! you cant post just "updated"Blitzaholic wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1082 Captains-CC record
592 Majors-CC record
121 Colonels-CC record
31 Brigadiers-CC record
4 Generals-CC record
2 Field Marshalls-CC record
1 Conquerer-CC record
updated
but the record is 2, these are cc records, we had 2 players over 4500 once, sjnap and sky, is why it says 2
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:08 pm
Wwoody123 wrote:Yeah, and 5 generals...
ok, 5 generals breaks a record, I will add that soon