CC's Records of RANKS
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
-
Velvecarrots
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:40 pm
- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1065 Lieutenants-CC record
567 Captains-CC record
120 Majors-CC record
27 Colonels-CC record
7 Brigadiers-CC record
3 Generals-CC record
1 Conquerer
0 Field Marshall
updated
here it is, I have not checked, so sure this needs some work

- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1075 Lieutenants-CC record
580 Captains-CC record
120 Majors-CC record
27 Colonels-CC record
7 Brigadiers-CC record
3 Generals-CC record
1 Conquerer
0 Field Marshall
updated

- JOHNNYROCKET24
- Posts: 5514
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: among the leets
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
currently 26Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1075 Lieutenants-CC record
580 Captains-CC record
120 Majors-CC record
27 Colonels-CC record
7 Brigadiers-CC record
3 Generals-CC record
1 Conquerer
0 Field Marshall
updated
-
Velvecarrots
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:40 pm
-
Velvecarrots
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:40 pm
This is new ranks only and the record number is not determined by how many people have reached colonel but by how many players have at least a certain point requirement or higher at an instant in time.
Last edited by Velvecarrots on Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This game was once fun, but the necessity to log in every day finally took its toll on me.
Best Score: 4660 (11/20/10)
Best Rank: 1 (8/2/13)
Best Score: 4660 (11/20/10)
Best Rank: 1 (8/2/13)
-
Ditocoaf
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:17 pm
- Location: Being eaten by the worms and weird fishes
I have to laugh whenever I hear about "inflation" of points.
1) The reason why there's more people above 2000 points? There's more people playing. There's also a lot more people under 2000 points.
2) No matter what, there's never going to be more than 1000 points per player. If there's a whole ton of points going to the top, then there's a bunch of guys stuck at the bottom. For every Colonel, there's at least three cadets and cooks. (wait--never mind this line of reason. The "complete deadbeats" argument can take it apart.
)
but on to my favorite...
3) In a 15-rank system (not counting new recruits)... On the top end, we have a completely unused rank (Field Marshall). On the bottom end, we have roughly a quarter (again, ignoring new recruits) of the population in the bottom two ranks.
How can anyone argue that there need to be less points in the system? I could make a case that there are too few. In a perfect system, the most populous rank would be more towards the middle, not the very bottom.
1) The reason why there's more people above 2000 points? There's more people playing. There's also a lot more people under 2000 points.
2) No matter what, there's never going to be more than 1000 points per player. If there's a whole ton of points going to the top, then there's a bunch of guys stuck at the bottom. For every Colonel, there's at least three cadets and cooks. (wait--never mind this line of reason. The "complete deadbeats" argument can take it apart.
but on to my favorite...
3) In a 15-rank system (not counting new recruits)... On the top end, we have a completely unused rank (Field Marshall). On the bottom end, we have roughly a quarter (again, ignoring new recruits) of the population in the bottom two ranks.
How can anyone argue that there need to be less points in the system? I could make a case that there are too few. In a perfect system, the most populous rank would be more towards the middle, not the very bottom.
- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
- firstholliday
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
some work for ya blitz.... 

7 firstholliday 3589 (58%) General 128-2 Netherlands
- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
firstholliday wrote:some work for ya blitz....

- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1082 Captains-CC record
592 Majors-CC record
121 Colonels-CC record
31 Brigadiers-CC record
4 Generals-CC record
2 Field Marshalls-CC record
1 Conquerer-CC record
updated

- JOHNNYROCKET24
- Posts: 5514
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: among the leets
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
hey ! you cant post just "updated"Blitzaholic wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1082 Captains-CC record
592 Majors-CC record
121 Colonels-CC record
31 Brigadiers-CC record
4 Generals-CC record
2 Field Marshalls-CC record
1 Conquerer-CC record
updated
. I got warned for that........ - Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:hey ! you cant post just "updated"Blitzaholic wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?
maybe you dont
1082 Captains-CC record
592 Majors-CC record
121 Colonels-CC record
31 Brigadiers-CC record
4 Generals-CC record
2 Field Marshalls-CC record
1 Conquerer-CC record
updated. I got warned for that........
btw- we only have 1 Field Marshall
but the record is 2, these are cc records, we had 2 players over 4500 once, sjnap and sky, is why it says 2

- Blitzaholic
- Posts: 23050
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Apocalyptic Area
Re: CC's Records of RANKS
Wwoody123 wrote:Yeah, and 5 generals...
ok, 5 generals breaks a record, I will add that soon



