Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:27 am
Apparently you have not seen this video, this is what I am banking my money on!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pow5_UYK ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pow5_UYK ... re=related
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=32499
peanutsdad wrote:Ahhhh, the second best load of crap i've heard all year!!!!! Come on you conspiracy freaks, the gov. did not set up 9/11. For all the fools that think this is true, here let me help you out. 9/11 was caused by terrorists, plain and simple, that and the lack of security that we should have already had in place in our airports and to this day don't........so there, now your all set, go back to your rooms now and start looking for the real killer JFK....
are you saying if they weren't arabs they wouldn't be noticed?jay_a2j wrote:J-Duds wrote:Alright, enough, we get it already. Blah, blah, blah ... controlled demolition ... temperature of burning jet fuel ... explosions ... free-fall faster than terminal velocity. Let me know if I missed anything.
You know what, just for fun, lets say you're right. Lets assume that the buildings did undergo a controlled demolition, the sounds in fact were bombs, ect. Even if this was the case, why does the government have to be responsible for it? Perhaps terrorists planted bombs to do the actual damage, but used the planes to cause doubt and suspicion to spread through people such as yourself and cause the people to doubt the government. This would then lead them to speak out against the government and cause unrest, ultimately leading to a weaker government that takes less action in foreign policy and regulation of the nation.
Isn't the crazed international conspiracy just as likely to come from the opposite side of the argument?
lol...yeah imagine hundreds of arabs going inside the towers to set it up.....unnoticed! Now THAT is nutty!
And it still wouldn't explain why our air force stood down!
Skittles! wrote:And another thing, IT DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING. YOU ARE GETTING A NEW PRESIDENT SOON, SO JUST STFU.
Sorry for the caps, it's just fucking annoying.
Jenos Ridan wrote:Heck, I'm an American and I'm even getting annoyed.
9-11 was real people, wake up!
Jenos Ridan wrote:Skittles! wrote:And another thing, IT DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING. YOU ARE GETTING A NEW PRESIDENT SOON, SO JUST STFU.
Sorry for the caps, it's just fucking annoying.
Heck, I'm an American and I'm even getting annoyed.
9-11 was real people, wake up!
Skittles! wrote:Americans, just get over it already! Does it really matter if the government set up 9/11? NO, because it is the past....
How many minutes elapsed between the first tower being hit and the second? The FAA knew 4 planes had been hi-jacked. Our fighter planes remained on the ground.... they could have been in the air in minutes following the first tower collision. Yet.....they stood down.....
Frigidus wrote:Jenos Ridan wrote:Skittles! wrote:And another thing, IT DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING. YOU ARE GETTING A NEW PRESIDENT SOON, SO JUST STFU.
Sorry for the caps, it's just fucking annoying.
Heck, I'm an American and I'm even getting annoyed.
9-11 was real people, wake up!
Do you mean 9/11 happened or that it was a lie? Because, seriously, I'm losing more and more faith in the average American.
I once again pose the question: If you're so damn sure, why aren't doing anything? Aside from rallying support in forums, I would either A. March on Washington (peacefully of course, otherwise they'd taze me, bro) or B. Leave the country.
I'm not saying "Love America or leave it" or anything on that level of stupidity, but considering our abysmal health care system, receding economy, high violence levels, general obesity, downright stupidity, and apparently our corrupt and treacherous government pretty much any other country looks great.
Iliad wrote:are you saying if they weren't arabs they wouldn't be noticed?jay_a2j wrote:J-Duds wrote:Alright, enough, we get it already. Blah, blah, blah ... controlled demolition ... temperature of burning jet fuel ... explosions ... free-fall faster than terminal velocity. Let me know if I missed anything.
You know what, just for fun, lets say you're right. Lets assume that the buildings did undergo a controlled demolition, the sounds in fact were bombs, ect. Even if this was the case, why does the government have to be responsible for it? Perhaps terrorists planted bombs to do the actual damage, but used the planes to cause doubt and suspicion to spread through people such as yourself and cause the people to doubt the government. This would then lead them to speak out against the government and cause unrest, ultimately leading to a weaker government that takes less action in foreign policy and regulation of the nation.
Isn't the crazed international conspiracy just as likely to come from the opposite side of the argument?
lol...yeah imagine hundreds of arabs going inside the towers to set it up.....unnoticed! Now THAT is nutty!
And it still wouldn't explain why our air force stood down!
EDIT: jay there are 2 planes flying above a city what the f*ck was the airforce supposed to do?
Iliad wrote:EDIT: jay there are 2 planes flying above a city what the f*ck was the airforce supposed to do?
Skittles! wrote:soundout9 wrote:wcaclimbing wrote:TL/DR
summary for the lazy people, please?
The gov set-up 9/11
Americans, just get over it already! Does it really matter if the government set up 9/11? NO, because it is the past. Just STFU about it already, NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU CONSPIRACY IDIOTS HAVE TO FUCKING SAY.
-ShadySoul- wrote:Skittles! wrote:soundout9 wrote:wcaclimbing wrote:TL/DR
summary for the lazy people, please?
The gov set-up 9/11
Americans, just get over it already! Does it really matter if the government set up 9/11? NO, because it is the past. Just STFU about it already, NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU CONSPIRACY IDIOTS HAVE TO FUCKING SAY.
AHHHHH
SKittles, you speak the truth brothar.
Frigidus wrote:Jenos Ridan wrote:Skittles! wrote:And another thing, IT DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING. YOU ARE GETTING A NEW PRESIDENT SOON, SO JUST STFU.
Sorry for the caps, it's just fucking annoying.
Heck, I'm an American and I'm even getting annoyed.
9-11 was real people, wake up!
Do you mean 9/11 happened or that it was a lie? Because, seriously, I'm losing more and more faith in the average American.
I once again pose the question: If you're so damn sure, why aren't doing anything? Aside from rallying support in forums, I would either A. March on Washington (peacefully of course, otherwise they'd taze me, bro) or B. Leave the country.
I'm not saying "Love America or leave it" or anything on that level of stupidity, but considering our abysmal health care system, receding economy, high violence levels, general obesity, downright stupidity, and apparently our corrupt and treacherous government pretty much any other country looks great.
jay_a2j wrote:Which is the greater loss? The passengers aboard plane 1 ? Or 1,500 in tower 1? Do the math. After the 1st plane hit tower 1 the US should of AT LEAST tried to get some fighters up in the air to try and guide, tail, chaperon or destroy the other 3 hi-jacked planes but they sat on the ground instead.
Snorri1234 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Which is the greater loss? The passengers aboard plane 1 ? Or 1,500 in tower 1? Do the math. After the 1st plane hit tower 1 the US should of AT LEAST tried to get some fighters up in the air to try and guide, tail, chaperon or destroy the other 3 hi-jacked planes but they sat on the ground instead.
A.) I doubt they had much of an idea where the planes were exactly.
B.) Chaperoning the planes wouldn't have worked, these terrorists were suiciders. So the only option would have been shooting them down, which meant shooting down a huge plane above a big city where it would most certainly cause lots of casualties.
jay_a2j wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Which is the greater loss? The passengers aboard plane 1 ? Or 1,500 in tower 1? Do the math. After the 1st plane hit tower 1 the US should of AT LEAST tried to get some fighters up in the air to try and guide, tail, chaperon or destroy the other 3 hi-jacked planes but they sat on the ground instead.
A.) I doubt they had much of an idea where the planes were exactly.
B.) Chaperoning the planes wouldn't have worked, these terrorists were suiciders. So the only option would have been shooting them down, which meant shooting down a huge plane above a big city where it would most certainly cause lots of casualties.
They had them on radar, they knew exactly where they were even BEFORE they got to the city. You may be right, the only option may have been to shoot them down, but they weren't "over the city" the entire time. Why spend time making up excuses for our government instead of addressing the sheer stupidity of their actions (or inactions)?
heavycola wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Which is the greater loss? The passengers aboard plane 1 ? Or 1,500 in tower 1? Do the math. After the 1st plane hit tower 1 the US should of AT LEAST tried to get some fighters up in the air to try and guide, tail, chaperon or destroy the other 3 hi-jacked planes but they sat on the ground instead.
A.) I doubt they had much of an idea where the planes were exactly.
B.) Chaperoning the planes wouldn't have worked, these terrorists were suiciders. So the only option would have been shooting them down, which meant shooting down a huge plane above a big city where it would most certainly cause lots of casualties.
They had them on radar, they knew exactly where they were even BEFORE they got to the city. You may be right, the only option may have been to shoot them down, but they weren't "over the city" the entire time. Why spend time making up excuses for our government instead of addressing the sheer stupidity of their actions (or inactions)?
Now hang on jay. Is the government incredibly stupid, as you say here, or did they organise the biggest terrorist attack in history - on their own people - and hoodwink the entire world?
These do not compute.
jay_a2j wrote:heavycola wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Which is the greater loss? The passengers aboard plane 1 ? Or 1,500 in tower 1? Do the math. After the 1st plane hit tower 1 the US should of AT LEAST tried to get some fighters up in the air to try and guide, tail, chaperon or destroy the other 3 hi-jacked planes but they sat on the ground instead.
A.) I doubt they had much of an idea where the planes were exactly.
B.) Chaperoning the planes wouldn't have worked, these terrorists were suiciders. So the only option would have been shooting them down, which meant shooting down a huge plane above a big city where it would most certainly cause lots of casualties.
They had them on radar, they knew exactly where they were even BEFORE they got to the city. You may be right, the only option may have been to shoot them down, but they weren't "over the city" the entire time. Why spend time making up excuses for our government instead of addressing the sheer stupidity of their actions (or inactions)?
Now hang on jay. Is the government incredibly stupid, as you say here, or did they organise the biggest terrorist attack in history - on their own people - and hoodwink the entire world?
These do not compute.
The stupidity leads you to the realization that they aren't stupid and that they were responsible for the attacks.
SolidLuigi wrote:WE should hold them to the same standards WE are held. And if you say this is Anti-American,