Conquer Club

Would maybe check streaker caculator before I started looking for a double voter.
Is there a double voter in the game Streak?

StorrZerg wrote:what CEO....

This game is the Employees vs. the Management. My assumption is that the CEO (who is referenced in the D1 scene) is one of the playable characters in the Management.

legionnare wrote:So Storr, Colton and DD are all on 3 votes, we need a claim from either DD or Colton or both, then decide which is the most suitable for a lynch or the day will have been wasted.

I've kinda claimed. Laid an obvious hint out there.

Kind of want to hammer Colton and end the day, but I'm not going to since it's almost over anyway.

Still think Mets is kind of scummy. Storr's acting weird still, but more Storr-like. He could be mafia though.

you don't have the hammer, virus unvoted

colton "might" come online soon to post, other wise ill be voting in about 2-3 hours, and will still need 1 more to vote

virus90 wrote:nope,
unvote

Why did you unvote?

because colton was at l-1 due to hidden vote

which thinking about it, why need to unvote since the hidden vote was used

Colton, if you happen to be around, you better claim pretty quick, it's less than 4 hours until the deadline, and you are 1 vote away from being lynched...

Yeah, just checked the thread for today.

So, I am a Company Security Guard. I patrol people's workspaces, preventing unauthorized access. I prevent people from being fired because "evidence" isn't planted to allow them to be fired. In short, I'm a bodyguard.

do you die if you protect someone successfully ?

colton24 wrote:Yeah, just checked the thread for today.

So, I am a Company Security Guard. I patrol people's workspaces, preventing unauthorized access. I prevent people from being fired because "evidence" isn't planted to allow them to be fired. In short, I'm a bodyguard.

Well, at first, I was like oh no that looks like an official write up, we need to save Colton. But, then I re-read the sentence a few times and it ISN'T making sense to me. If ISN'T was changed to IS, then it would seem like he is working for the management and planting evidence on their behalf.

Anyone else have an opinion?

FP'd by Storr

Yes. Or, at least I presume so, that I am "fired" instead of them. It wasn't specified, but considering that's how most bodyguard roles work, I am operating on that assumption

charm wrote:

colton24 wrote:Yeah, just checked the thread for today.

So, I am a Company Security Guard. I patrol people's workspaces, preventing unauthorized access. I prevent people from being fired because "evidence" isn't planted to allow them to be fired. In short, I'm a bodyguard.

Well, at first, I was like oh no that looks like an official write up, we need to save Colton. But, then I re-read the sentence a few times and it ISN'T making sense to me. If ISN'T was changed to IS, then it would seem like he is working for the management and planting evidence on their behalf.

Anyone else have an opinion?

FP'd by Storr

I'm not sure what you mean. "Evidence isn't planted" ie. the reason to fire them isn't planted, because I'm there guarding their workplace.

FP by charm, obviously.

Yeah, the claim is believable enough. I don't want to switch my vote.

so no lynch on anyone?

Hmmm...I'm still not convinced!
Why haven't you been around Colton?
Seems like with that job you should have been guarding the town all of Day 1.
How exactly do you make sure evidence isn't planted??? - that still seems like very bad wording.
It also leads us now to believe that the management has the ability to plant evidence or try and throw us off.

I'm not buying it - call it female intuition!
I'm not changing my vote.

FP'd by Storr

So we should lynch him, because of this "evidence thing" if not im shooting him

I don't understand what the "evidence thing" is. The implication is clear that the way the management fires us is by planting evidence at our desks or cubicles, and then "discovering" it and using that as a reason to fire us. The bodyguard stops it. I mean, it's just flavor, but there's nothing particularly weird about it.

If Colton is telling the truth, won't he be an obvious mafia target tonight?

i think he said "evidence" because i said "evidence" thus thats why i want to kill him.

I think mets is with colton both mafia..

StorrZerg wrote:i think he said "evidence" because i said "evidence" thus thats why i want to kill him.

Wait, what? What are you talking about here?

1. your not calling for my lynch based on me being a vig, and you haven't exactly "defended me"

2. and now you decide to no lynch today, over lynching colton

I mean i'm shooting colton if no one hammers him

I don't get what the "evidence thing" is, and thus I don't get why you want him dead

i want you dead cause your defending the lynch of someone when we have no chance of lynching anyone else. Because you want a no lynch.

I want colton dead for using the word "evidence" Since, i personally have no idea how "mafia kill people" so him using the word "evidence" is super sketchy