Conquer Club

DrewDude wrote:In my eyes I've helped you pick out the sheeps and bandwagoners that need to be interrogated instead of myself. I can be a little useful in my own ways.

A little useful? Settling for mediocrity is not what you should aim for. I would like to see you post more and not make us figure out what you are trying to say, but thats just me.

Also, just as a test, can you switch your double-vote to me? I just want confirmation of your role. This way, even if we have a deadbeat, we can be sure you are actually who you say you are.

As to the ideas surrounding herk's delusion, I don't really get what you are all arguing about. The argument surrounding herk was much weaker than the argument about flores' hypocrisy surrounding his lynch. I feel that the debate about his accusation towards me detracts from the original case on flores.

Now, I'm not just saying this to take heat off me. I could care less what he said and if you have reservations about my towniness then I would prefer you direct them at me rather than speculate herk's words. If you all trust herk's word on this matter then I feel we are all going to be screwed. If on the other hand, you have a legitimate case against me, then we can discuss it.

Mr. Squirrel wrote:As to the ideas surrounding herk's delusion, I don't really get what you are all arguing about. The argument surrounding herk was much weaker than the argument about flores' hypocrisy surrounding his lynch. I feel that the debate about his accusation towards me detracts from the original case on flores.

Why do you think Flores and Aage are choosing to go over this point?

I personally think Mr. Squirrel was simply being OMGUSed by herk as herk was stepping up to the noose. In terms of scumminess on my list,

1. aage/flores/Victor for bandwagon voting patterns.

2. Vio/xuereb for not posting (although they have been prodded)

In regards to Drew, I second Mr. S when we ask for some clarity in posting. If you have to say something, make it explicit. I do find it a bit odd that Fir would spend so much time defending him. I'm sure you're a nice guy chu, but I don't often see you straight up defending someone to the hilt. It's definitely somewhat out of character for you if I may metagame a bit here. I wonder if you guys are lovers or something.

Defending me to the hilt? The reason being is because Fir knows that the bandwagon is very scummy and you know it as well, even scummier than I. Why do you require more proof of my role after I've already demonstrated it without flaw? Sounds to me you both are very paranoid, but if it will put your mind at ease then so be it. Seeing as I've already revealed myself I suppose one more demonstration couldn't hurt anything.


As for the lovers remark that's top secret.

... yet you didnt do it

jeraado wrote:... yet you didnt do it

What didn't he do? Switch his secret extra vote to someone else? We won't be able to see that until the next vote count is posted.

safariguy5 wrote:I do find it a bit odd that Fir would spend so much time defending him. I'm sure you're a nice guy chu, but I don't often see you straight up defending someone to the hilt. It's definitely somewhat out of character for you if I may metagame a bit here. I wonder if you guys are lovers or something.

There could be any number of reasons why one player would defend another. Maybe they do have linked roles. Maybe fircoal genuinely believes that Drewdude is town. Maybe they are scum mates and fircoal is trying to save him. Maybe fircoal is scum and trying to visible link himself with another player so that should he die and be revealed as scum then suspicion will be cast on those he associated himself with. At this point it is almost impossible to really tell why he would do this. However, at this point I think the most likely situation I see the most likely situation is that fircoal is defending someone he think, or maybe even knows, to be town...

DrewDude wrote:Defending me to the hilt? The reason being is because Fir knows that the bandwagon is very scummy and you know it as well, even scummier than I. Why do you require more proof of my role after I've already demonstrated it without flaw? Sounds to me you both are very paranoid, but if it will put your mind at ease then so be it. Seeing as I've already revealed myself I suppose one more demonstration couldn't hurt anything.


As for the lovers remark that's top secret.

Wait, so you're letting someone else do the defending for you? :s

I have a question for Drew: Did you know that by casting the lynching vote yesterday you'd be seen as scummy?

Also I'm defending him because 1) there are people scummier, and 2) I don't believe in noobs being lynched cause they're noobs.

safariguy5 wrote:I personally think Mr. Squirrel was simply being OMGUSed by herk as herk was stepping up to the noose. In terms of scumminess on my list,

1. aage/flores/Victor for bandwagon voting patterns.

2. Vio/xuereb for not posting (although they have been prodded)

In regards to Drew, I second Mr. S when we ask for some clarity in posting. If you have to say something, make it explicit. I do find it a bit odd that Fir would spend so much time defending him. I'm sure you're a nice guy chu, but I don't often see you straight up defending someone to the hilt. It's definitely somewhat out of character for you if I may metagame a bit here. I wonder if you guys are lovers or something.

I am sorry i tried to post yesterday on my phone when i got the prod before you posted this) but i did not check to see if it went though which it appears that it did not so what my post was going to say is:

Vote violet to have a party of two

Fircoal wrote:I have a question for Drew: Did you know that by casting the lynching vote yesterday you'd be seen as scummy?

Of course I did, but can I say that I fully supported lynching herk when only one of my votes was on him? Nay. Plus if I did stay clear of acting scummy the bandwagon vote might not have occurred (or as quickly) and we may still be trying to piece things together without definite suspects. Get on them.

DrewDude wrote:

Fircoal wrote:I have a question for Drew: Did you know that by casting the lynching vote yesterday you'd be seen as scummy?

Of course I did, but can I say that I fully supported lynching herk when only one of my votes was on him? Nay. Plus if I did stay clear of acting scummy the bandwagon vote might not have occurred (or as quickly) and we may still be trying to piece things together without definite suspects. Get on them.

if you knew it'd be scummy and you had another vote, then why didn't you just use the other vote to vote him?

xuereb wrote:
Vote violet to have a party of two

Being a bit hypocritical there xureb? Going to vote me for being inactive when you were inactive yourself. Or to start a bandwagon
I think you could at least give more of a reason than that. Joke vote stage is over.

Because then there's a chance that the mafia would suspect me sooner since if memory serves I gave both of my votes near the same time.

DrewDude wrote:Because then there's a chance that the mafia would suspect me sooner since if memory serves I gave both of my votes near the same time.

You could also have *not posted* and just voted the guy and no-one would have suspected you. They probably would have susptected Flores since she put herk on l-1 if I remember correctly.

Anyway, vioIet, yes joking stage is over, means you gotta POST. Yes you did post there, but all you said was "look who's talking" and go back into the submarine.

aage wrote:

DrewDude wrote:Because then there's a chance that the mafia would suspect me sooner since if memory serves I gave both of my votes near the same time.

You could also have *not posted* and just voted the guy and no-one would have suspected you. They probably would have susptected Flores since she put herk on l-1 if I remember correctly.

Anyway, vioIet, yes joking stage is over, means you gotta POST. Yes you did post there, but all you said was "look who's talking" and go back into the submarine.

I can actually see the use of him actually voting rather than secretly voting for him. If he had secretly voted, then if he had to claim later it would make him look scummier if he has been the hammerer in a town lynch. By voting with his own name, he is able to give his defense straight away and settle his score with the town. Its actually a smart move when you think about it.

Idk if that was all in his thought process, but thats the result it had.

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

aage wrote:

DrewDude wrote:Because then there's a chance that the mafia would suspect me sooner since if memory serves I gave both of my votes near the same time.

You could also have *not posted* and just voted the guy and no-one would have suspected you. They probably would have susptected Flores since she put herk on l-1 if I remember correctly.

Anyway, vioIet, yes joking stage is over, means you gotta POST. Yes you did post there, but all you said was "look who's talking" and go back into the submarine.

I can actually see the use of him actually voting rather than secretly voting for him. If he had secretly voted, then if he had to claim later it would make him look scummier if he has been the hammerer in a town lynch. By voting with his own name, he is able to give his defense straight away and settle his score with the town. Its actually a smart move when you think about it.

Idk if that was all in his thought process, but thats the result it had.

It is but I was pointing out that he didn't have to post AND secret-vote at the same time

DrewDude wrote:I'm back and it seems people are once again facing my direction as a nice candidate to lynch. Take a good look at those who've been band-wagoning herk and I. I'd bet you'd find the scum votes within them if you looked hard enough. Being inconsistent even when I said I loved being scummy? Sounds like a waste of oxygen to have such a conversation. Instead of looking at the most obvious people you should take a look at who's using the obvious people as a shield. Now did I throw Herk under the bus? Yes. Would my vote have changed much if I didn't vote for him? Probably not. Like I said i'm not a fan of wasting time so if you wish to know anymore about me before a lynch occurs feel free to ask. You should investigate more before you decide to put the noose around my neck.

For my vote I'll go for the person that voted me first for this day.

Vote FloresDelMal

This is not a claim...

VioIet wrote:

xuereb wrote:
Vote violet to have a party of two

Being a bit hypocritical there xureb? Going to vote me for being inactive when you were inactive yourself. Or to start a bandwagon
I think you could at least give more of a reason than that. Joke vote stage is over.

i dont particularly wish to vote for either of the other two because i dont think they should be lynched
i did realize the hypocrisy but lets face it my vote to you will not affect you

xuereb wrote:

VioIet wrote:

xuereb wrote:
Vote violet to have a party of two

Being a bit hypocritical there xureb? Going to vote me for being inactive when you were inactive yourself. Or to start a bandwagon
I think you could at least give more of a reason than that. Joke vote stage is over.

i dont particularly wish to vote for either of the other two because i dont think they should be lynched
i did realize the hypocrisy but lets face it my vote to you will not affect you

Why don't you think either of the two should be lynched?
Which of the two do you think is scummier?

xuereb wrote:i dont particularly wish to vote for either of the other two because i dont think they should be lynched
i did realize the hypocrisy but lets face it my vote to you will not affect you

There are more than two choices. Why don't you make some discussion to find the person that you think is actually worth being lynched...

I'd be more encouraged to give vote counts if you people changed votes.

Today's combo orders


DrewDude, #3 comes with: FloresDelMal, Victor Sullivan, Haggis_McMutton

FloresDelMal, #3 with: DrewDude, ga7, Mr. Squirrel

VioIet, #2 With: safariguy5, xuereb

Mr.Squirrel, Mystery special #1: ???


With 13 alive it takes 7 for lunch

Deadline is in one week, next friday

/ wrote:Mr.Squirrel, Mystery special #1: ???

Ok, Drew. On account that mafia double-voters are almost non-existent, you're practically guaranteed town to me.

spiesr wrote:

xuereb wrote:i dont particularly wish to vote for either of the other two because i dont think they should be lynched
i did realize the hypocrisy but lets face it my vote to you will not affect you

There are more than two choices. Why don't you make some discussion to find the person that you think is actually worth being lynched...

That's interesting because I notice in the latest vote count you haven't decided either.

By the way, is it going to be a no lynch deadline or highest vote count deadline?

Hey aage, xue, speiser, violet, safari and other person who seriously hasn't been posting enough, which of the two do you find scummier at the moment. If the deadline were to go right now, whom would you vote for?

Fircoal wrote:Hey aage, xue, speiser, violet, safari and other person who seriously hasn't been posting enough, which of the two do you find scummier at the moment. If the deadline were to go right now, whom would you vote for?

It's jeraddo.