[GP/UI] No Fortifications / Reinforcements

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

User avatar
spiesr
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Re: ng option Re: No Reinforcements Option

Post by spiesr »

Fazeem wrote:Interesting option but should it not be called no fortifications?
The term used "officially" on the site is Reinforcements.
betiko
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: location, location

Re: ng option Re: No Reinforcements Option

Post by betiko »

spiesr wrote:
Fazeem wrote:Interesting option but should it not be called no fortifications?
The term used "officially" on the site is Reinforcements.


Yup read the tread from the start and don t understand what is unclear about a reinforcement for some of you. On the drop it s deployment or drop, not reinforcements!

Regarding this option, why not. It seemed unplayable on the first thought, but could be interesting. Any new setting makes you think of new strategies and solve new problems. I guess that with those rules a good strategy would be to reduce to 1s territories adjacent to your bonus/ the one you want to take and advance slowly and with patience. I think that with such rule there could be lots of turning points in a given game.
Image
The Voice
Posts: 681
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:37 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Location, Location!

Re: No Reinforcements Option

Post by The Voice »

People who use the timing out to their benefit in games with spoils are no longer punished by not being able to fort.
chapcrap
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Kansas City

Re: No Reinforcements Option

Post by chapcrap »

The Voice wrote:People who use the timing out to their benefit in games with spoils are no longer punished by not being able to fort.

This is the most relevant point to this not being implemened, as far as I can see.

I think before this is implemented (if it is), then the thread below also needs to be implemented to protect against the situation that The Voice is talking about.

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=188165#p1009545
User avatar
spiesr
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Re: [GP/UI] No Fortifications / Reinforcements

Post by spiesr »

IMPLEMENTED
User avatar
Invdr_zim
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:50 pm
Gender: Female

Re: [GP/UI] No Fortifications / Reinforcements

Post by Invdr_zim »

sounds interesting, go for it
User avatar
greenoaks
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: No Reinforcements Option

Post by greenoaks »

when will this be moved to Implemented ?
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28213
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: No Reinforcements Option

Post by Dukasaur »

chapcrap wrote:
The Voice wrote:People who use the timing out to their benefit in games with spoils are no longer punished by not being able to fort.

This is the most relevant point to this not being implemened, as far as I can see.

I think before this is implemented (if it is), then the thread below also needs to be implemented to protect against the situation that The Voice is talking about.

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=188165#p1009545

Now that the no forts option is a reality, the no refusing cards bugfix becomes even more crucial.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
spiesr
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Re: [GP/UI] No Fortifications / Reinforcements

Post by spiesr »

Last edited by spiesr on Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Added another.
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”