Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Woodruff »

jrl332005 wrote:I am sorry to repeat anything, but you need to read the bill! Police are allowed to stop anyone that is acting suspious of any crime and ask for an Arizona driver's license (the 'papers' everyone is talking about). Because you need to be a tax-paying member of Arizona to get an Arizona license. So if someone is pulled over for suspision of drunk driving and he/she doesn't have a driver's license (which is illegal anyway) he/she is taken to prison until the accused produces a valid driver's license or it is proved that the accused is illegal and deported.


Taken to prison? I find that highly unlikely, sir.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Timminz »

If you're sick of the deer getting into your garden, maybe you should get your kids to stop putting out bait for them. It's easier than shooting them once they get in.
User avatar
jrl332005
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: PA, United States

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by jrl332005 »

well held in costudy(pardon my spelling).
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

jrl332005 wrote:I am sorry to repeat anything, but you need to read the bill! Police are allowed to stop anyone that is acting suspious of any crime and ask for an Arizona driver's license (the 'papers' everyone is talking about). Because you need to be a tax-paying member of Arizona to get an Arizona license. So if someone is pulled over for suspision of drunk driving and he/she doesn't have a driver's license (which is illegal anyway) he/she is taken to prison until the accused produces a valid driver's license or it is proved that the accused is illegal and deported.



Many of us here, in fact, have read the Arizona 1070b law, along with its amendments.

Police are already allowed to stop anyone acting suspicious, and that is pretty much the essence of being a peace officer. I do not disagree with using the tool of the human brain. Of course, I do disagree with racial bias and discrimination. I always have, and most of Americans always have as well.

On a more comical note,if racial profiling is truly what people are worried about, I hear there are a lot of hispanic and other minority judges, cops, cheriifs, mayors, sargeants who are by no means 100% perfect when it comes to racial profiling or discrimination, so that should kind of even it out should it not?
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Phatscotty wrote:On a more comical note,if racial profiling is truly what people are worried about, I hear there are a lot of hispanic and other minority judges, cops, cheriifs, mayors, sargeants who are by no means 100% perfect when it comes to racial profiling or discrimination, so that should kind of even it out should it not?

No. You judge people on their actions, not their parent's bloodline.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Timminz wrote:If you're sick of the deer getting into your garden, maybe you should get your kids to stop putting out bait for them. It's easier than shooting them once they get in.

Exactly.
User avatar
stahrgazer
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Gender: Female
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by stahrgazer »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:I'll add one more: we should reopen Ellis Island or some version of it, to make the process for legally immigrating easier.

Most of the "processing" occurs before people even come here. The only get on a plane after having Visas, etc already. As for the rest... assylum seekers, those applying to extend their Visas or change to permanent status often wind up in jails, where they are often treated as bad or worse than thieves and murderers.


You're saying the United States makes a practice of throwing people in jail just for trying to legally apply to extend their Visa or get citizenship? Not so!

I agree that employers who employ illegals should be cracked down on; but the illegals themselves should be cracked down on, as well. A two-fold solution, condemning both sides of the crime.

As for the rest of what you were saying (didn't bother quoting the entire thing, it's too long)... immigrants who applied for proper identification will have that identification when stopped and asked to produce some. If they've got a social security card and a driver's license, they'll be able to show it. If they've got a valid green card, they'll be able to show that. It's those who don't have any of those things, that the AZ law is looking for.

And as someone appropriately pointed out, if a group of people is stopped, the driver asked to produce identification, and the driver has no license, he's committed a crime. Now, if the truck is registered appropriately to the name he claims, quite frequently the law allows a couple days to come in and show a valid license, with a minor fine for driving without one. If, however, the truck is not registered to the person, and no one in the vehicle has identification, yes, it's possible the person will be held. Not "prison" (prison usually means a term of more than one year) but in a holding cell, police or county lockup, until someone comes back with the identification.

Someone stopped and asked to produce a license to a vehicle not registered to the name they claim is how my sister and a few friends, over the years, have gotten their stolen vehicles back.

Iff the law were in Florida, it wouldn't target any specific group; groups known to flock to Florida illegally are frequently Guatemalan, Cuban, Dominican, or Haitian...a mix of cultures, many with latin heritage, but not all. Whatever the predominance is for Arizona is likely what they're seeking. So it's barely "racial profiling." What profiling there is, is done appropriately.

If stopped, they're asked to produce identification, which is far different than assuming they have none and instead merely hauling them off just for being there. Most law-abiding citizens have no issue with producing identification on request, and many legal immigrants are proud to show they're here legally and by choice. This law does not infringe on law-abiding citizens' rights.
Image
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Image
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by MTIceman41 »

Phatscotty wrote:Image



Scotty you are awesome
Image
User avatar
firsal901
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:33 am
Gender: Male
Location: Laguna, Philippines (Google it)

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by firsal901 »

they should not allow even one of the aliens
with their green bodies and black eyes
i mean,they might kill obama with a ray gun !!!

if ur talking about about mexicans.
just streghten the border patrol
something like the berlin wall
but more terrifying
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

stahrgazer wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:I'll add one more: we should reopen Ellis Island or some version of it, to make the process for legally immigrating easier.

Most of the "processing" occurs before people even come here. The only get on a plane after having Visas, etc already. As for the rest... assylum seekers, those applying to extend their Visas or change to permanent status often wind up in jails, where they are often treated as bad or worse than thieves and murderers.


You're saying the United States makes a practice of throwing people in jail just for trying to legally apply to extend their Visa or get citizenship? Not so!

It depends on how the get here, other circumstances, but yes, that very much does happen. It is not a secret. Most of the reports I have heard/seen go back quite a while, but there were a few just a year or two. I can try to find them if you seriously want to question this.

A lot of people do get by "free", but the problem is there is too little uniformity.

stahrgazer wrote:I agree that employers who employ illegals should be cracked down on; but the illegals themselves should be cracked down on, as well. A two-fold solution, condemning both sides of the crime.

As for the rest of what you were saying (didn't bother quoting the entire thing, it's too long)... immigrants who applied for proper identification will have that identification when stopped and asked to produce some. If they've got a social security card and a driver's license, they'll be able to show it. If they've got a valid green card, they'll be able to show that. It's those who don't have any of those things, that the AZ law is looking for.

And as someone appropriately pointed out, if a group of people is stopped, the driver asked to produce identification, and the driver has no license, he's committed a crime. Now, if the truck is registered appropriately to the name he claims, quite frequently the law allows a couple days to come in and show a valid license, with a minor fine for driving without one. If, however, the truck is not registered to the person, and no one in the vehicle has identification, yes, it's possible the person will be held. Not "prison" (prison usually means a term of more than one year) but in a holding cell, police or county lockup, until someone comes back with the identification.

The law was recently ammended. The original version allowed police to stop anyone, no need to have any kind of crime involvement at all. And, it certainly was not limited to people driving.

It is still open to abuse. Many areas are notorious for setting up "speed traps" or other kinds of traffic traps. While some reports are no doubt exaggerated, it happens enough that AAA and others have, at times issued warnings to members. Anybody who thinks that race won't be a factor in who gets asked for ID is rather naive. It happens already.
stahrgazer wrote:Someone stopped and asked to produce a license to a vehicle not registered to the name they claim is how my sister and a few friends, over the years, have gotten their stolen vehicles back.

Iff the law were in Florida, it wouldn't target any specific group; groups known to flock to Florida illegally are frequently Guatemalan, Cuban, Dominican, or Haitian...a mix of cultures, many with latin heritage, but not all. Whatever the predominance is for Arizona is likely what they're seeking. So it's barely "racial profiling." What profiling there is, is done appropriately.

Multiple studies of law enforcement entities show that racial profiling is still very much engrained in how even some well trained officers operate.

stahrgazer wrote:If stopped, they're asked to produce identification, which is far different than assuming they have none and instead merely hauling them off just for being there. Most law-abiding citizens have no issue with producing identification on request, and many legal immigrants are proud to show they're here legally and by choice. This law does not infringe on law-abiding citizens' rights.

Again, the law was changed. However, this argument that "if you are not commiting a crime, why not provide ID" is just wrong. Requiring ordinary citizens to carry ID or face jail is akin to what we expected in the old Soviet Union, or apartheid South Africa, not the U.S. of A.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Just discover the racial profil-less robot and call it a day ok?
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Arizona's Next Immigration Target: Children of Illegals

"Anchor babies" isn't a very endearing term, but in Arizona those are the words being used to tag children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants. While not new, the term is increasingly part of the local vernacular because the primary authors of the nation's toughest and most controversial immigration law are targeting these tots - the legal weights that anchor many undocumented aliens in the U.S. - for their next move.

Buoyed by recent public opinion polls suggesting they're on the right track with illegal immigration, Arizona Republicans will likely introduce legislation this fall that would deny birth certificates to children born in Arizona - and thus American citizens according to the U.S. Constitution - to parents who are not legal U.S. citizens. The law largely is the brainchild of state Sen. Russell Pearce, a Republican whose suburban district, Mesa, is considered the conservative bastion of the Phoenix political scene. He is a leading architect of the Arizona law that sparked outrage throughout the country: Senate Bill 1070, which allows law enforcement officers to ask about someone's immigration status during a traffic stop, detainment or arrest if reasonable suspicion exists - things like poor English skills, acting nervous or avoiding eye contact during a traffic stop. (See the battle for Arizona: will a border crackdown work?)

But the likely new bill is for the kids. While SB 1070 essentially requires of-age migrants to have the proper citizenship paperwork, the potential "anchor baby" bill blocks the next generation from ever being able to obtain it. The idea is to make the citizenship process so difficult that illegal immigrants pull up the "anchor" and leave. (See pictures of the Great Wall of America.)

The question is whether that would violate the U.S. Constitution. The 14th Amendment states that "all persons, born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States." It was intended to provide citizenship for freed slaves and served as a final answer to the Dred Scott case, cementing the federal government's control over citizenship.

But that was 1868. Today, Pearce says the 14th Amendment has been "hijacked" by illegal immigrants. "They use it as a wedge," Pearce says. "This is an orchestrated effort by them to come here and have children to gain access to the great welfare state we've created." Pearce says he is aware of the constitutional issues involved with the bill and vows to introduce it nevertheless. "We will write it right." He and other Republicans in the red state Arizona point to popular sympathy: 58% of Americans polled by Rasmussen think illegal immigrants whose children are born here should not receive citizenship; support for that stance is 76% among Republicans.

Those who oppose the bill say it would lead to more discrimination and divide the community. Among them is Phoenix resident Susan Vie, who is leading a citizen group that's behind an opposing ballot initiative. She moved to the U.S. 30 years ago from Argentina, became a naturalized citizen and now works as a client-relations representative for a vaccine company. "I see a lot of hate and racism behind it," Vie says. "Consequently, I believe it will create - and it's creating it now - a separation in our society." She adds, "When people look at me, they will think, 'Is she legal or illegal?' I can already feel it right now." Vie's citizen initiative would prohibit SB 1070 from taking affect, place a three-year moratorium on all related laws - including the anchor baby bill - to buy more time for federal immigration reform. Her group is racing to collect 153,365 signatures by July 1 to qualify for the Nov. 2 general election.

Both sides expect the anchor baby bill to end up before the U.S. Supreme Court before it is enacted. "I think it would be struck down as facially unconstitutional. I can't imagine a federal judge saying this would be OK," says Dan Barr, a longtime Phoenix lawyer and constitutional litigator. Potentially joining the anchor baby bill at the Supreme Court may be SB 1070, which Arizona Republican Governor Jan Brewer signed into law in April. It is set to take effect July 29, but at least five courtroom challenges have been filed against it. Pearce says he will win them all.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

And this fight against otherwise honest immigrants is going to divert resources. So, of course the cartels will move in to take advantage
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

PLAYER57832 wrote:And this fight against otherwise honest immigrants is going to divert resources. So, of course the cartels will move in to take advantage

huh?
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2487
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by ViperOverLord »

I'll bottom line this shiz. You have a group of ignorant a-holes telling us that our citizenship means nothing and that since we do believe it means something we are racist. Fock that. No need to even argue all their little focking talking points designed to confuse the issue. This some fundamental shiz.

THIS IS OUR HOUSE!

(POUNDS CHEST!)
User avatar
The Bison King
Posts: 1957
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
Location: the Mid-Westeros

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by The Bison King »

if ur talking about about mexicans.
just streghten the border patrol
something like the berlin wall
but more terrifying


More terrifying hmm #-o ... ok The wall will be 40 feet tall and made of black steel. At the bottom, about three feet up, there will be a row of buzz saws that is always on. Around face level there will be flame throwers that fire 20 feet out. (all of this will be on the Mexican side of course) on the American side there will Ice cream and candy stores!!!
Image

Hi, my name is the Bison King, and I am COMPLETELY aware of DaFont!
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13124
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by 2dimes »

That sounds pretty good. Well on the 'merican side.
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13124
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by 2dimes »

What if you put up some ice cream and candy stores in Mexico so there's something to stay in for?
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

2dimes wrote:What if you put up some ice cream and candy stores in Mexico so there's something to stay in for?

This is the REAL solution.


As a side note, Arizona is now losing lots of business from Mexican tourists, they are not all illegal, ya' know.
User avatar
Nobunaga
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Nobunaga »

From Obama's speech yesterday, regarding the new law in Arizona.

The law is an understandable expression of the public's frustration with the government's failure to overhaul the immigration system, but it also is ill-conceived, divisive and would put undue pressure on local police departments.

... No, dumbass. It is the public's frustration and anger over the federal government's very conscious and calculated refusal to enforce federal law for political benefit.

And people buy into this man's shite. It's incredible, really. I blame public schools and the mass-media which cc'er Doctor whats-its is always harping on.
User avatar
Night Strike
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Night Strike »

The fact that the federal government posted signs saying citizens had to stay away from AMERICAN land because illegals could not be controlled in those areas shows that the federal government has willingly failed to do their 1 job of protecting the citizens and territory of this nation. It's a travesty that deserves prosecution for failure to execute the nation's laws.
Image
User avatar
Nobunaga
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Nobunaga »

Meanwhile, shots fired during a gun battle in Juarez hit city hall in El Paso.

http://www.elpasotimes.com/ci_15405948
User avatar
King Doctor
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:18 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by King Doctor »

Nobunaga wrote:I blame public schools and the mass-media which cc'er Doctor whats-its is always harping on.


Yet I suggested that finding a way to force the mass-media to present balanced and non-partisan news coverage, and everybody threw a hissy fit and accused me of trying to murder freedom...



This forum is a very confusing place sometimes.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”