Conquer Club

Ya, you don't play many games at all! I sent you another invite if your are interested.

Never mind.

AndyDufresne wrote:

Mr_Adams wrote:I remember when I realized how laid back and unprofessional the admin is. for example:

Upgrade to premium page wrote:It is not easy to develop and maintain an online game like Conquer Club. Hundreds of hours must be spent programming, and dollars must be spent on web hosting, support staff, gourmet peanut butter and other expenses. Please support Conquer Club by upgrading to Premium Membership. It costs only $25 USD per year.

If you'd like more examples of unprofessional administration, I can direct you to any of my Longest Thread, Thread posts. Or maybe any of my posts? Hm, I'll leave that up to those with professional eyes.

================

I remember the last time I played a 1vs1 on my favorite map...feels so long ago! Man, I need to get back to those games.


--Andy

This made me lol. Andy, all your posts are professional.

================

I remember when natty_dread was my Foundry coach and later hired me for the Foundry section of the Newsletter. I had asked to join when the September 2010 issue came out, not really having high hopes, then come to find out, they had been wanting me to join since August! I'd post the little shpeal from the Newsletter forum (cuz it's hilarious and, admittedly, flattering), but I don't think I'm allowed to

Gilligan wrote:

Joodoo wrote:more than 2 years ago, this feat was achieved?

That was fun

damn...that was a loooong time ago

i remember when [player]Woodruff[/player] use to post in the forums and play CC

gameplayer wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

Joodoo wrote:more than 2 years ago, this feat was achieved?

That was fun

damn...that was a loooong time ago

What exactly happened?

tdans wrote:

gameplayer wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

Joodoo wrote:more than 2 years ago, this feat was achieved?

That was fun

damn...that was a loooong time ago

What exactly happened?

Look at the card count.

Mr_Adams wrote:

tdans wrote:

gameplayer wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

Joodoo wrote:more than 2 years ago, this feat was achieved?

That was fun

damn...that was a loooong time ago

What exactly happened?

Look at the card count.

ohhhhhh sweet!!!!!

... 2000 placed you easily in the top 100, those were the days.

trevor33 wrote:... 2000 placed you easily in the top 100, those were the days.

hehe, when i left this site 3 years ago i was around top 20. i don't remember the exact position but it was close. now i'm not even in the top 200

Too bad we can't look at top percentiles! This would make it easier to tell if you've gotten better worse relative to anyone else, because of course as more people come, if you're still in the top 10 percent, you're good regardless of whether you're in the top 20 to be in it or the top 200! (those numbers are nowhere close to 10% of the site)

-rd

rdsrds2120 wrote:Too bad we can't look at top percentiles! This would make it easier to tell if you've gotten better worse relative to anyone else, because of course as more people come, if you're still in the top 10 percent, you're good regardless of whether you're in the top 20 to be in it or the top 200! (those numbers are nowhere close to 10% of the site)

-rd

Lack should implement this

iamkoolerthanu wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:Too bad we can't look at top percentiles! This would make it easier to tell if you've gotten better worse relative to anyone else, because of course as more people come, if you're still in the top 10 percent, you're good regardless of whether you're in the top 20 to be in it or the top 200! (those numbers are nowhere close to 10% of the site)

-rd

Lack should implement this

And include historical data so we can see into the past.

Percentiles would be a nice addition. Ranks should also include percentiles in ther requeriments, this would avoid point inflation/deflation.

OliverFA wrote:Percentiles would be a nice addition. Ranks should also include percentiles in ther requeriments, this would avoid point inflation/deflation.

Definitely! Someone should start a...suggestion maybe? (I forgot how).

-rd

I remember this game..
Game 273695..good ol nuke!

rdsrds2120 wrote:

OliverFA wrote:Percentiles would be a nice addition. Ranks should also include percentiles in ther requeriments, this would avoid point inflation/deflation.

Definitely! Someone should start a...suggestion maybe? (I forgot how).

-rd

Perhaps someone could also suggest a forum for such suggestions, so that members of the community could post their thoughts about suggestions! Wow, it's like a think tank in here! Good work, men (and ladies).

-Sully

Victor Sullivan wrote:Good work, men (and ladies).

Which ones does rds fit in?

Ace Rimmer wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:Good work, men (and ladies).

Which ones does rds fit in?

both

Remember when...

... [player]Ace Rimmer[/player] was [mod edit]

Ace Rimmer wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:Good work, men (and ladies).

Which ones does rds fit in?

Oh, HA HA. I'm sure he'd get a kick outta that

And he would go under "men", for hopefully obvious reasons...

-Sully

keyborn wrote:Remember when...

we could actually leave real feedback describing our experiences and opponents, good or bad, in a particular game...some of those comments will always be classics...

oh yes, i alsmot forgot about the feedback system.

it was quite nice tho.

zimmah wrote:

keyborn wrote:Remember when...

we could actually leave real feedback describing our experiences and opponents, good or bad, in a particular game...some of those comments will always be classics...

oh yes, i alsmot forgot about the feedback system.

it was quite nice tho.

Indeed. You can still leave feedback in a way, by responding to someone's rating of you.
Bring back feedback.

I remember when shut up

I remember when people played fog because they enjoyed the challenge of not being able to see the whole board.