Conquer Club

Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.

Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.

you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?

well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.

Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.

Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.

Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.

Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.

You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.

unvote vote Hologram

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.

you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.

Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.

You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.

unvote vote Hologram

People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?

pmchugh wrote:

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.

you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.

Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.

You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.

unvote vote Hologram

People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?

so you don't think this a reach at all and that his deduction is justified from my random vote?

saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.

Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.

I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.

Hologram wrote:

saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.

Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.

I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.

Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:

saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.

Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.

I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.

Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?

Do you see me changing my vote?

Hologram wrote:

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:

saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.

Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.

I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.

Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?

Do you see me changing my vote?

I hope you don't.

Right now it looks like you are scum and PMC is covering for you.

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:

saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.

Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.

I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.

Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?

Do you see me changing my vote?

I hope you don't.

Right now it looks like you are scum and PMC is covering for you.

I saw that as well. With absolutely nothing to go on, he defended me on a completely bullshit argument. Either I'm way too persuasive, or he's way to scummy.

Unvote

Your move pmc.

Suspect101 wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.

you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?

Suspect101 wrote:

Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.

Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.

You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.

unvote vote Hologram

People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?

so you don't think this a reach at all and that his deduction is justified from my random vote?

Hologram wrote:

Suspect wrote:I hope you don't.

Right now it looks like you are scum and PMC is covering for you.

I saw that as well. With absolutely nothing to go on, he defended me on a completely bullshit argument. Either I'm way too persuasive, or he's way to scummy.

Unvote

Your move pmc.

Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?

Now of course your saying WIFOM, but I am not even stupid enoguh to do that lol. WIFOM but who cares.

Now to the actual point, holo you just acted ridiculously defensively. If you make a point to get reaction there is no point in backing away as soon as its made, you realised suspect was coming on to you and me so you instantly stepped away and passed the buck to me. Far too defensive you have no backbone.

Town have nothing to hide and therefore are not scared, unvote vote holo

pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?

Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?

Suspect101 wrote:

pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?

Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?

Fair enough although if you read this:

pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?

I am hardly defending him, and I stand by everything I said in that post.

All random votes are open to suspcion just like any other post, I didn't say his reasons were good nor that I agreed with them; merely that you can't just say "it was random vote/post therefore it doesn't count". A more accurate defense would have mocked his reasons i.e. he said your name was one reason. Or you would have ignored it as random if you seen this to be a joke. I wasn't saying you were wrong and he was right, merely that his methods were right and yours were wrong.

Put it this way if he hadn't said that we would all be pretty quiet just now, and that is where I liked his post not on the content itself.

pmchugh wrote:

Suspect101 wrote:

pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?

Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?

Fair enough although if you read this:

pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?

I am hardly defending him, and I stand by everything I said in that post.

All random votes are open to suspcion just like any other post, I didn't say his reasons were good nor that I agreed with them; merely that you can't just say "it was random vote/post therefore it doesn't count". A more accurate defense would have mocked his reasons i.e. he said your name was one reason. Or you would have ignored it as random if you seen this to be a joke. I wasn't saying you were wrong and he was right, merely that his methods were right and yours were wrong.

Put it this way if he hadn't said that we would all be pretty quiet just now, and that is where I liked his post not on the content itself.

Woo! See what I started? A giant gagglefuck where we have two suspicious people, myself and pmc. Now I know why I did what I did, but pmc seems to be a little too butt hurt and over-reactive to me suddenly putting suspicion on him.

My lack of vote still stands. Both of you seem to be way to butt hurt over all of this though, that's for sure.

Hologram wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

Suspect101 wrote:

pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?

Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?

Fair enough although if you read this:

pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?

I am hardly defending him, and I stand by everything I said in that post.

All random votes are open to suspcion just like any other post, I didn't say his reasons were good nor that I agreed with them; merely that you can't just say "it was random vote/post therefore it doesn't count". A more accurate defense would have mocked his reasons i.e. he said your name was one reason. Or you would have ignored it as random if you seen this to be a joke. I wasn't saying you were wrong and he was right, merely that his methods were right and yours were wrong.

Put it this way if he hadn't said that we would all be pretty quiet just now, and that is where I liked his post not on the content itself.

Woo! See what I started? A giant gagglefuck where we have two suspicious people, myself and pmc. Now I know why I did what I did, but pmc seems to be a little too butt hurt and over-reactive to me suddenly putting suspicion on him.

My lack of vote still stands. Both of you seem to be way to butt hurt over all of this though, that's for sure.

Hah, im voting you for backing down to easily, eery point should be scrutinised but this isn't a three player game. What does everyone else think?

pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?

Hologram looks the scummiest.

Yeah, maybe more from me later. A bit busy today.

Stroop wrote:

pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?

Hologram looks the scummiest.

Yeah, maybe more from me later. A bit busy today.

Alright. Holo was reaching to accuse Suspect, but his points were in fact valid. Suspect looked like scum/lyncher to me more than Holo, especially since he was so sensitive about being called the lyncher over a random vote.

Hologram backed off as soon as someone mentioned pmc and he might be partners in crime and turns the spotlight on pmc (who doesn't even look bad at all (am I scum with pmc now?)). My money is on Holo, but #2 is surely Suspect.

vote Hologram

I backed off because I was taking heat for a complete bullshit vote, a vote I only cast to get the ball rolling, like a random vote on steroids. Furthermore, pmc's actions seemed a little off, but not enough to cast a vote, and he too had some good points, more reason for me not having a vote on someone right now.

Stroop wrote:

Stroop wrote:

pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?

Hologram looks the scummiest.

Yeah, maybe more from me later. A bit busy today.

Alright. Holo was reaching to accuse Suspect, but his points were in fact valid. Suspect looked like scum/lyncher to me more than Holo, especially since he was so sensitive about being called the lyncher over a random vote.

Hologram backed off as soon as someone mentioned pmc and he might be partners in crime and turns the spotlight on pmc (who doesn't even look bad at all (am I scum with pmc now?)). My money is on Holo, but #2 is surely Suspect.

vote Hologram

Ok he was suspicious but that was a very premature hammer, why didn't you let him claim or at least put up a defense. Very poor decision IMO.