Conquer Club

jiminski wrote:And that for the sum of humanity to perceive it as ok to think of any woman purely sexually, has an overall negative effect.

Jenos Ridan wrote:

comic boy wrote:Sex is the most natural thing in the world so I really cannot understand why it is illegal to earn money for providing sexual services to sad and ugly people.

I know your trying to bait me ("the first step in avoiding a trap is knowing about it's existance"--Thufir Hawat, DUNE), so I'm going to pretend that I didn't read this drivel.

It's okay, the sad and ugly people pride day is soon, you'll get sympathizers then.






And that is all, repeat, all, that I have to say on the matter.

TheProwler wrote:

jiminski wrote:And that for the sum of humanity to perceive it as ok to think of any woman purely sexually, has an overall negative effect.

It would be naive to think this isn't how most men think of most women.

Any dude that says "Hey, I don't do that. I respect and appreciate all the good qualities of all women." is just trying to get laid.

TheProwler wrote:

comic boy wrote:

jiminski wrote:I tend to agree.
If you legalise it: you remove the ponces, help the heroin addicts out of their downward spiral and enforce an age limit so young girls are not exploited as easily.

By legalising it you can commit more resources to the genuinely destructive aspects to the sex trade.

And of course it would annoy all those fat ugly women who resent other people getting a bit.

Dude, I'll go into business as a man whore. My fee schedule will be based on the woman's weight. If they can afford the extra food, they can afford the extra charge for my meat.

This could make all the fat ugly women happy!!! It could make me rich!!!

I am all for it. Where do I vote?

TheProwler wrote:Wow, good answer....



To the question "Who would dress his doggies up for Halloween?"


Did you misread the small print?

Nobody asked that question.

b.k. barunt wrote:

TheProwler wrote:Wow, good answer....



To the question "Who would dress his doggies up for Halloween?"


Did you misread the small print?

Nobody asked that question.

Hell, i don't read most of your larger print. And yeah, someone who would dress his doggies up for halloween would very likely be the kind of twat who would call female dogs "women". Also the kind of ass clown who would brag about his athletic acheivments when all he does is ump baseball. Go figure.

I say legalize prostitution, then the assprowler will have to pay whump. Heh heh.


Honibaz

TheProwler wrote:

b.k. barunt wrote:

TheProwler wrote:Wow, good answer....



To the question "Who would dress his doggies up for Halloween?"


Did you misread the small print?

Nobody asked that question.

Hell, i don't read most of your larger print. And yeah, someone who would dress his doggies up for halloween would very likely be the kind of twat who would call female dogs "women". Also the kind of ass clown who would brag about his athletic acheivments when all he does is ump baseball. Go figure.

I say legalize prostitution, then the assprowler will have to pay whump. Heh heh.


Honibaz

Really, go back and read your own posts. You were the one who suggested that there are women other than "human women". And then you proceeded to make very little sense in your subsequent post.

You seem to be craving a Flame Wars type of exchange. There's a forum for that. It's called Flame Wars. Once you get over the traumatic memories, come on back!

I'll be waiting.