Page 2 of 7

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:38 pm
by blakebowling
Frop wrote:
Users browsing this forum: beav77, BENJIKAT IS DEAD, Fruitcake, Juan_Bottom, knapper, Night Strike, pookey, t-o-m, TotoroHat and 0 guests

What the hell?

I think it has something to do with the fact that he was online when he was banned (maybe not, It happened on another forum that I worked on)

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:39 pm
by InkL0sed
Shrug??? Seriously?

Compare that attitude to this one:

AndyDufresne wrote:The ModSquad and I have been watching this topic for a while, and we've all come to agreement on action.

Due to the fact that Dugcarr1 specifically confessed to the allegations at hand, we are forced to come to this decision:

As you know, we like a general hands off rule approach, as is duly noted in our Rules Page. I can say we honestly never imagined anyone would be capable of doing such things. As has been general knowledge in the forum we've always taken
'proactive measures to enforce fair-play.'

As we do not specifically have a rule covering this, we believe we are well within our proactive measures to stomp this out right here now. Thus, Dugcarr1 will be BANNED from the FORUM and PERSONAL MESSAGES for 4 months (I.E. 1/3 year) as the forum was the root of this all.

We all surely hope to never come across anything like this again. Lets all just have fun and kill each other...fairly...alright? See you all on the battlefield,





Regards, ModSquad & your ZooKeeper


--Andy


*sigh*

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:42 pm
by timmytuttut88
Frop wrote:Timmy - I hate to break it to you, but a lot of people thought t-o-m was an annoying retard.

So be it.
Frop wrote:You're just blinded by your love for little British boys with severe brain damage.

Uh oh, someone baited me. You better watch out or you might get forum banned...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:42 pm
by The Fuzzy Pengui
blakebowling wrote:
Frop wrote:
Users browsing this forum: beav77, BENJIKAT IS DEAD, Fruitcake, Juan_Bottom, knapper, Night Strike, pookey, t-o-m, TotoroHat and 0 guests

What the hell?

I think it has something to do with the fact that he was online when he was banned (maybe not, It happened on another forum that I worked on)

I think guests are still able to read the forums, they just can't post (but I could be wrong).

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:42 pm
by Frop
InkL0sed wrote:Shrug??? Seriously?

Compare that attitude to this one:

AndyDufresne wrote:blablabla


*sigh*

You're absolutely right, they should've permabanned Duggy as well.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:43 pm
by Fruitcake
Frop wrote:
Fruitcake wrote:
Frop wrote:
Fruitcake wrote:I see no 'holocaust'.

More and more imbeciles are being permabanned, Twill's Final Solution is upon us.


Oh dear, the Final Solution huh. I had received reports of this, they are on my study floor somewhere, but to date did not know that the imbeciles were being permabanned with such severity.

Perhaps we should have a pop concert...."Free the Imbeciles"

Imbeciles have been despised and ridiculed throughout history, but anti-imbecilism has gotten worse over the years. Perhaps it's time we give them a forum outside of CC so that they can practice their ways without bothering anybody else. How about something like 'State of Imbecil'?


Indeed, this is a noble idea. One hopes that somewhere amongst the Imbeciles there are those who can lead the others to this new State and carve themselves a niche of their own making. Maybe t-o-m can lead them? Or have I got this wrong and he isn't actually a pure blooded Imbecile? Apologies if I have offended him or other Imbeciles by assuming this.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:44 pm
by blakebowling
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:
blakebowling wrote:
Frop wrote:
Users browsing this forum: beav77, BENJIKAT IS DEAD, Fruitcake, Juan_Bottom, knapper, Night Strike, pookey, t-o-m, TotoroHat and 0 guests

What the hell?

I think it has something to do with the fact that he was online when he was banned (maybe not, It happened on another forum that I worked on)

I think guests are still able to read the forums, they just can't post (but I could be wrong).

It's been on there for a while, and he hasn't shown up as reading other forums. (I know guests can read the forums, I just didn't think he would still be in GD)

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:45 pm
by Optimus Prime
Yes, members who get forum banned now revert to guest status, which allows them to read, but not post.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:47 pm
by Frop
Optimus Prime wrote:Yes, members who get forum banned now revert to guest status, which allows them to read, but not post.

Wow, that's some 'forum ban' you have there. CC's really pulling out the big guns this time.

Image

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:50 pm
by blakebowling
Frop wrote:
Optimus Prime wrote:Yes, members who get forum banned now revert to guest status, which allows them to read, but not post.

Wow, that's some 'forum ban' you have there. CC's really pulling out the big guns this time.

Image

you do realize that you can READ the forums without logging in at all??

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:51 pm
by InkL0sed
Frop wrote:
Optimus Prime wrote:Yes, members who get forum banned now revert to guest status, which allows them to read, but not post.

Wow, that's some 'forum ban' you have there. CC's really pulling out the big guns this time.

Image


You can read the forums without an account... :roll:

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:53 pm
by Frop
blakebowling wrote:you do realize that you can READ the forums without logging in at all??

InkL0sed wrote:You can read the forums without an account... :roll:

No shit, Sherlocks. That shouldn't be possible either, not to mention forum bans should be based on IPs, MAC addresses, etc. if necessary. It's cute that you're both jumping at the opportunity to appear clever for a change though, too bad you failed yet again.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:58 pm
by Optimus Prime
Who cares if they can read them? Being able to post was what got them in trouble in the first place, they can't do any harm by reading, now can they, so it's just as effective as blocking it entirely.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:59 pm
by InkL0sed
Frop wrote:
blakebowling wrote:you do realize that you can READ the forums without logging in at all??

InkL0sed wrote:You can read the forums without an account... :roll:

No shit, Sherlocks. That shouldn't be possible either, not to mention forum bans should be based on IPs, MAC addresses, etc. if necessary. It's cute that you're both jumping at the opportunity to appear clever for a change though, too bad you both failed yet again.


You are such a hypocrite. All you do on these forums is complain, and flame people. You shouldn't endorse such casually given permabans, as you'll find yourself banned permanently one day.

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:03 pm
by InkL0sed
t-o-m wrote:
blakebowling wrote:
Frop wrote:
Users browsing this forum: beav77, BENJIKAT IS DEAD, Fruitcake, Juan_Bottom, knapper, Night Strike, pookey, t-o-m, TotoroHat and 0 guests

What the hell?

I think it has something to do with the fact that he was online when he was banned (maybe not, It happened on another forum that I worked on)

Blake you're 12 years old, you dont 'work' in a forum.
It shows me as viewing the forum because i am, just because im banned doesnt mean that ive died and left the site immediately.

I would like to just say a few things.
Owen: Please refrain from being off-topic and your attempts to spam. Explanations have been made and you have chosen to ignore that. You are being plain ignorant.

Daydream: Yes, 5th ban, however some of the other bans were pathetic. My 1st ban was because my signiture was too big! And i had 2 other bans after that for the same thing - although wicked never admitted it; it was indeed for the same thing.

Frop: Please grow up. Take a step back, what are you bringing to the thread? A tad bit of spam...some minor flames...BY GOD! THAT'S WHAT I GOT PERMA BANNED FOR!

Fruitcake: I would have expected better from you. Seriously. I hardly know you, probably never spoken to you, however i think Frop has influenced you in this thread. I think you know what I'm talking about.

Thanks to Timmy :D
Timmy pointed out that i didnt have the community hating me on the site, but i probably do have a few. I mainly 'hang' with the cool people down south of the forum; not that many GD professionals will ever venture down there.

I dont see why i have a perma ban. I mean, i would always say that, you know that - i know that. However ask InkL0sed states above or makes a point out of, there have been other people who the community have absolutely hated and purposly broken the rules - and have walked away with 4 months! I post in a "negative way" and get life.
Unlike many of the perma banned people on the site, i have actually done something for the site. I have made a map, helped noobs, made quite a few people signatures, helped look after a clan. It's hardly like i was the bad man in the dark shadows who never did anything good.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:05 pm
by ManBungalow
So what counts as spam in the forum?
Does asking someone to join your game in the forum count as spam (unless you're in the callout section) etc.. ?

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:06 pm
by owenshooter
is he still banned? how can CC survive without it's heart and soul? my oh my... *snicker*-0

p.s.-Users browsing this forum: dfaarc, Hsur, InkL0sed, ManBungalow, MrBenn, owenshooter, t-o-m and 0 guests since your looking in t-o-m, take some of this new found reflection time to fix your clan sig... thank you!!

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:06 pm
by Frop
InkL0sed wrote:You are such a hypocrite. All you do on these forums is complain, and flame people. You shouldn't endorse such casually given permabans, as you'll find yourself banned permanently one day.

Yes, I see how that could be a problem. I would still be able to read all your mindless drivel and cliché copypasta.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:08 pm
by InkL0sed
Keep going, let's see if you get a warning out of it.

You probably won't, because Twill doesn't seem to have anything against you :roll:

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:10 pm
by Frop
InkL0sed wrote:Keep going, let's see if you get a warning out of it.

You probably won't, because Twill doesn't seem to have anything against you :roll:

You're baiting me, please stay on topic. We should be discussing how wonderful it is that t-o-m got permanently banned and how people like you are crying over it.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:15 pm
by owenshooter
InkL0sed wrote:Keep going, let's see if you get a warning out of it.

You probably won't, because Twill doesn't seem to have anything against you :roll:

well, you are about to get a ban for posting posts for a perma-banned member that contain flames. i like you inky, you seem smarter than this. talk to you in a few days.-0

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:17 pm
by cena-rules
hmmmm ok so far frop has done everything tom got banned for

PERMA BAN FROP

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:19 pm
by InkL0sed
owenshooter wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:Keep going, let's see if you get a warning out of it.

You probably won't, because Twill doesn't seem to have anything against you :roll:

well, you are about to get a ban for posting posts for a perma-banned member that contain flames. i like you inky, you seem smarter than this. talk to you in a few days.-0


I'm the one about to get a ban, when Frop has done nothing but flame in this thread? Come to think of it, that's all he ever does. Hm...

Well, fine. Bring on the ban. I probably need a break anyway. I'm not going to cower from doing what I feel is right just because I might not be able to post for a few days :roll:

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:19 pm
by timmytuttut88
t-o-m wrote:Thanks to Timmy :D
Timmy pointed out that i didnt have the community hating me on the site, but i probably do have a few. I mainly 'hang' with the cool people down south of the forum; not that many GD professionals will ever venture down there.

Actuslly i'm not a GD professional. I usually am in the FW area. It just pisses me off how the management of this website are banning people who aren't hated or who haven't even been that bad.

A perma-ban used to be serious. It used to be that you did some serious shit to get a perma-ban. I remember how people freaked after norse was perma-banned. Now it's like people get can perma-bans if they bait people enough times. It's so stupid....

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:21 pm
by Frop
Good, I can feel your anger. Strike me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!