Page 2 of 2
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:13 pm
by Timminz
jangler3 wrote:But what is to stop him from giving me a bad rating because of mine towards him.
The fact that he can't see what rating you left until it's too late to rate you.
But he is now on my foe list
And that.
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:36 am
by jako
jangler3 wrote:I think you miss...You miss out. Since the deferred armies rule has started you get all kind of excuses. I just got kicked from a game
that has a player, that has missed 4 out of 11 rounds. I can handles a miss but 4!? Defanitly using as an advantage.
So he has a bad rating from me. And I told him on his wall. But what is to stop him from giving me a bad rating because of mine towards him. But he is now on my foe list, so One down.
well the design in the rating system is that, he cant see what rating u gave him till the game archives, so by that time, whatever rating he gave u will reflect what he really thought and not retaliatory rating.
however, the fact that u said that on his wall, already gave him an idea that hes received a bad rating from u, thus he can now give u a bad rating in return.
the lesson: dont go bitching on their wall and giving them a sign of how they were rated. next time, give them a bad rating, wait till the game archives, the bitch on their wall. the most they can do in retaliation is withdraw their rating which wont affect ur rating.
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:04 am
by owenshooter
jangler3 wrote:I think you miss...You miss out. Since the deferred armies rule has started you get all kind of excuses. I just got kicked from a game
that has a player, that has missed 4 out of 11 rounds. I can handles a miss but 4!? Defanitly using as an advantage.
So he has a bad rating from me. And I told him on his wall. But what is to stop him from giving me a bad rating because of mine towards him. But he is now on my foe list, so One down.
first of all, deferred armies are better than the old rule when they got the armies on the next turn. now THAT was an advantage. there is no advantage, you can attack the person that missed their turn and limit their armies. if you limit them to 3 armies, guess what? they only get 3 at the start and 3 at the end of their turn. people tend to not try to limit the armies of the person missing, and assume they are gone. that is how you get beat by someone missing turns. if you miss turns, it is not an advantage in a game with an experienced or responsible player. and as far as the rating goes, he can't see what you leave him until it is too late to leave a retaliatory rating...-0
p.s.-did you really use the term "asshat" in an attempt to insult someone? wow, name calling!!!! so mature...
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:45 am
by Iron Butterfly
I cant beleive your repeating what was said earlier in this thread...sigh.
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:54 am
by jiminski
Iron Butterfly wrote:I cant beleive your repeating what was said earlier in this thread...sigh.
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:08 am
by owenshooter
Iron Butterfly wrote:I cant beleive your repeating what was said earlier in this thread...sigh.
i can't believe that this is all you had to had to the discussion...-0
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:22 am
by jangler3
owenshooter wrote:p.s.-did you really use the term "asshat" in an attempt to insult someone? wow, name calling!!!! so mature...
I think if you look at what I said. I called his comment an "asshat comment." For saying something he has no knowledge on. Similar to you repeating what others said in the 2 previous posts. Just have to post something to seem important...
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:26 am
by owenshooter
jangler3 wrote:owenshooter wrote:p.s.-did you really use the term "asshat" in an attempt to insult someone? wow, name calling!!!! so mature...
I think if you look at what I said. I called his comment an "asshat comment." For saying something he has no knowledge on. Similar to you repeating what others said in the 2 previous posts. Just have to post something to seem important...
oh, you are one of those people that posts in a thread and expects everyone to agree with them, and then when they don't, name calling begins. you posted what the OP posted, so why can't i respond to you, like others responded to the OP and other comments? please, tell me how responding to you is so wrong. teach me the ways of the forum, oh sage...-0
p.s.-and everyone knows i'm important... self important... but important, nonetheless!
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:34 am
by jangler3
^^^ I don't even know what that means. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz-ero
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:04 am
by Timminz
jangler3 wrote:^^^ I don't even know what that means. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz-ero
So, your lack of understanding something, equates to him being a "zzzzzzzzzzzz-ero"?
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:08 am
by wicked
and what does any of this have to do with deferred armies? back on track guys..
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:17 am
by owenshooter
wicked wrote:and what does any of this have to do with deferred armies? back on track guys..
psst... about 2 hours too late! we took it to PM's, but thank you for the friendly reminder!! and on that note, deferred armies rock!-0
Re: Unfair Defferred armies
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:59 pm
by jangler3
owenshooter wrote:wicked wrote:and what does any of this have to do with deferred armies? back on track guys..
psst... about 2 hours too late! we took it to PM's, but thank you for the friendly reminder!! and on that note, deferred armies rock!-0
Just for the record, You took it to PM's. Deferred armies suck.
