[Official] Classic TOUCH-UP [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
DiM
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Post by DiM »

RjBeals wrote:
wicked wrote:Why do some circles have borders, and some don't? Can you make the circles a little darker?
No.. Not darker.

I think they all have borders, just some are easier to see than others.


i agree but to be honest i don't feel like squishing my eyes to see if all of them have borders.
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
Top
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Post by wicked »

RjBeals wrote:
wicked wrote:Why do some circles have borders, and some don't? Can you make the circles a little darker?
No.. Not darker.

I think they all have borders, just some are easier to see than others.


Yes a little darker. I'd like the see the difference. And no, not all have borders.
Top
User avatar
pepperonibread
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Post by pepperonibread »

wicked wrote:
RjBeals wrote:
wicked wrote:Why do some circles have borders, and some don't? Can you make the circles a little darker?
No.. Not darker.

I think they all have borders, just some are easier to see than others.


Yes a little darker. I'd like the see the difference. And no, not all have borders.


Some could/should be more noticeable than they are now, but they're definitely all there.
Image
Top
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Post by wicked »

If you say so. The fact not everyone can see them means they're not consistently visible. Are borders really necessary? what does it look like without?
Top
User avatar
pepperonibread
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Post by pepperonibread »

No arguments there. Some of the circles do look a little messy. Specifically the edges.
Image
Top
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:
Contact wcaclimbing

Post by wcaclimbing »

on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?
Image
Top
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:
Contact hecter

Post by hecter »

wcaclimbing wrote:on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?

Same problem with Afghanistan.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
Top
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:
Contact wcaclimbing

Post by wcaclimbing »

hecter wrote:
wcaclimbing wrote:on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?

Same problem with Afghanistan.


lol AFCHANISTAN.

and CREAT BRITAIN.

probably just fixing all of the Gs is what is needed.
Image
Top
User avatar
jako
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 4:50 am
Gender: Male
Location: A lost soul with no-one to stalk.

Post by jako »

wcaclimbing wrote:
hecter wrote:
wcaclimbing wrote:on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?

Same problem with Afghanistan.


lol AFCHANISTAN.

and CREAT BRITAIN.

probably just fixing all of the Gs is what is needed.


Egypt and new guinea is by far worst. i swear it looks like new cuinea.
Top
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Post by hulmey »

Looks the same to me :?
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
Top
User avatar
rebelman
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: People's Republic of Cork
Contact:
Contact rebelman

Post by rebelman »

the orange numbering is almost impossible to read in western oz
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
Top
WidowMakers
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Gender: Male
Location: Detroit, MI

Post by WidowMakers »

wcaclimbing wrote:on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?
It looks like whatever font was used makes the G's look like C's when that small.

Maybe find the original font (whatever that was) or edit the text manually

pepperonibread wrote:No arguments there. Some of the circles do look a little messy. Specifically the edges.
I agree. There is already so much going on with the colors (especially in the small map with smaller circles. I say get rid of the colored outline.

DiM wrote:could we at least get a clarification as to what that shark/zeppelin/missile/jet/fish thing really is?

And as far as all of the talk about removing the missiles or whatever is in Canada, is that part of the project scope. I mean is lack allowing these aspects to be edited or just the text and army circles?

WM
Image
Top
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

WidowMakers wrote:
DiM wrote:could we at least get a clarification as to what that shark/zeppelin/missile/jet/fish thing really is?

And as far as all of the talk about removing the missiles or whatever is in Canada, is that part of the project scope. I mean is lack allowing these aspects to be edited or just the text and army circles?

WM


Lack has veto'ed any change on the origonal map, the only modifications allowed are:

-army circles
-Terr names
-Legends
-Movement of boarders if needed to fit names

I think that about covers it :D
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
Top
User avatar
Kaplowitz
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Post by Kaplowitz »

I agree w/ the "G" problem on the small map, and can we please take out the pictures?!
Image
Top
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

Kaplowitz wrote:I agree w/ the "G" problem on the small map, and can we please take out the pictures?!


Like i JUST said there protected under lacks veto
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
Top
User avatar
volfan
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:50 pm

Post by volfan »

The classic is better right now.
Image

GO VOLS!!!
Top
User avatar
jako
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 4:50 am
Gender: Male
Location: A lost soul with no-one to stalk.

Post by jako »

someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!
Top
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

jako wrote:someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!


who said WM was doing this touch up?
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
Top
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:
Contact hecter

Post by hecter »

gimil wrote:
jako wrote:someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!


who said WM was doing this touch up?

You! Get the zepplin thing out of Canada! And those damn missiles in Ukraine! And all the other stupid things you can find! Go, with haste!
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
Top
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

hecter wrote:
gimil wrote:
jako wrote:someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!


who said WM was doing this touch up?

You! Get the zepplin thing out of Canada! And those damn missiles in Ukraine! And all the other stupid things you can find! Go, with haste!


Who says im doing it lol
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
Top
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:
Contact hecter

Post by hecter »

gimil wrote:
hecter wrote:
gimil wrote:
jako wrote:someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!


who said WM was doing this touch up?

You! Get the zepplin thing out of Canada! And those damn missiles in Ukraine! And all the other stupid things you can find! Go, with haste!


Who says im doing it lol

Did I say I cared who's doing this touchup? GO! DO EET!
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
Top
User avatar
Incandenza
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Post by Incandenza »

gimil wrote:Lack has veto'ed any change on the origonal map, the only modifications allowed are:

-army circles
-Terr names
-Legends
-Movement of boarders if needed to fit names

I think that about covers it :D


Mmmmkay then. I guess the caterpillar stays. :D
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
Top
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Post by gimil »

Image
Image
Image
Image
  • Removed army circle stroked edges
  • Fixed the G/C issue on the small map
  • Added new colours for armies
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
Top
User avatar
edbeard
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:41 am

Post by edbeard »

1. Is there something different about the text for QUEBEC on the large map? It looks like maybe it's the old version of the text or something? It might just be the background though.

2. Could you show us the large and small with random numbers instead of 88? I think it'll help determine if there's a readability issue since that's what this is mostly about.
Top
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Post by wicked »

The white circles in Europe make the country borders indistinguishable... it's just a big white blur in N.Eur, S.Eur area.

Also the shadow on the text in Aussie doesn't look clean, looks blurry.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”