Conquer Club

In the event that the story may be legit. (I find it hard to believe but I am in no position to say you are lying so I will not make the statement) then you my friend may be one of the players that could challenge me in a game. We'll definately have to meet sometime ingame.

I'm curious as to who the 9 players who humbled you are?

I'm I one of the lucky few?

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=515465

quit messing with beast... if he has talked to lack and approved it then good for him. you guys have no reason to care unless you have some personal feud with him, or you have lost to him. if roomates have a common computer and they all play on one account then to me that is avoiding looking suspicious. beast isnt hiding anything...if there were multiple accounts on one computer then you all would be complaining about multi's and when the ISP is checked they would probably be in trouble...soooo one account, one computer, lacks approval...yep you guys dont have a case

Thank you US.

jpcloet, I have to be perfectly honest I've tried to avoid the maximus map because of no bonus. All attacking vs defending dice with no real desire to hold anything. I will have a looksee for you tho.

browng-08 wrote:I could whoop Wilderbeast's candy ass 12-0 on any map any settings... the kids all chat.

Please ignore this post. I did not say this. Long story.

Understood Brown.

lol so the Hunters have given up on anything with wilderbeast's name on it after the last fiasco.

I am curious though, can multiple people legally share an account? I remember in the SkyT thread awhile back wicked said 'no, only for babysitting so you don't miss any turns.' So why does beast get special treatment?

I'm not trying to start anything, I don't know beast and have never played with him, I'm just curious why the lack of uniform administration on CC's behalf. What makes this different then the SkyT/whoever example?

If this is the case, my girlfriend and I will just share one account, why spend $50 on Premium when we can just spend $25? I play this game for fun, could care less whether I get a few extra loses...

kalishnikov wrote:lol so the Hunters have given up on anything with wilderbeast's name on it after the last fiasco.

I am curious though, can multiple people legally share an account? I remember in the SkyT thread awhile back wicked said 'no, only for babysitting so you don't miss any turns.' So why does beast get special treatment?

I'm not trying to start anything, I don't know beast and have never played with him, I'm just curious why the lack of uniform administration on CC's behalf. What makes this different then the SkyT/whoever example?

If this is the case, my girlfriend and I will just share one account, why spend $50 on Premium when we can just spend $25? I play this game for fun, could care less whether I get a few extra loses...

it is NOT legal to share an account, wilderbeast is lying, that is why he is allowed to do it, there is only one person playing on his account.

hwhrhett wrote:

kalishnikov wrote:lol so the Hunters have given up on anything with wilderbeast's name on it after the last fiasco.

I am curious though, can multiple people legally share an account? I remember in the SkyT thread awhile back wicked said 'no, only for babysitting so you don't miss any turns.' So why does beast get special treatment?

I'm not trying to start anything, I don't know beast and have never played with him, I'm just curious why the lack of uniform administration on CC's behalf. What makes this different then the SkyT/whoever example?

If this is the case, my girlfriend and I will just share one account, why spend $50 on Premium when we can just spend $25? I play this game for fun, could care less whether I get a few extra loses...

it is NOT legal to share an account, wilderbeast is lying, that is why he is allowed to do it, there is only one person playing on his account.

But if he's lying, why don't the mods say that? He has admitted time after time he's sharing his account.

Also, the deal with SkyT that the people who babysitted him were playing in the same game as him.

Snorri1234 wrote:But if he's lying, why don't the mods say that? He has admitted time after time he's sharing his account.

Also, the deal with SkyT that the people who babysitted him were playing in the same game as him.

it would be nice if the mods stated a definitive answer.

The only thing that is silly about his claims is that he basically claims to be the best player ever on this site. And that leads me to wonder why he lets other people on his account play for him.

Wilderbeast has to be lying about his wins.

hwhrhett wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:But if he's lying, why don't the mods say that? He has admitted time after time he's sharing his account.

Also, the deal with SkyT that the people who babysitted him were playing in the same game as him.

it would be nice if the mods stated a definitive answer.

Yeah. Doubt it will happen soon though.

Sorry guys but I'm behind beast I've personally played his room mates on his account. I've talked to his room mates on MSN!!!. If you need proof his room mates are Zach, and Dave. I've talked to him and as a former fellow clan mate am standing behind him 100%.

JesusReigns wrote:Sorry guys but I'm behind beast I've personally played his room mates on his account. I've talked to his room mates on MSN!!!. If you need proof his room mates are Zach, and Dave. I've talked to him and as a former fellow clan mate am standing behind him 100%.

arent you one of krushers multis?

No not multis. Actually everyone makes mistakes my friend that was one of them. I have learned from my mistakes and moved on why don't you get over it.

JesusReigns wrote:Sorry guys but I'm behind beast I've personally played his room mates on his account. I've talked to his room mates on MSN!!!. If you need proof his room mates are Zach, and Dave. I've talked to him and as a former fellow clan mate am standing behind him 100%.

Yeah well thanks for that JR, don't mind me and all, but I'll care about your opinion just the moment that you're not CC's most famous secret-alliance monger.

You've personally talked to his roomates on MSN? Well good for you... you've also personally developed a history of brokering game-rigging deals via that particular medium. Had that slipped your mind?

How is Krusher these days anyway? Is he still on your MSN buddys list, or did you jetsion him from it when you had your attack of 'conscience' just before you realised you were about to get banned if you didn't rat him out?

Seriously, you're about the least qualified person to be giving his 'personal opinion' in this forum. Perhaps you should save your chat for General Discussions until we forget about your sordid little CC past?

That is a real moral quandry.

Do you rat out your mate, or keep lying in hopes of stealing the conquerer title some day.

What would Jesus do?

You guys don't understand. Ask anyone that got involved even the players if I had pmed them all to apologize before this popped up.
1. I'm a Christian and made a mistake and did what was right.
2. I was not concerned about getting banned from the game b/c I really could care less. I do enjoy this website but heh if I got banned I wouldn't die.
3. Like I said I did what I thought was right which was to tell what I did wrong.
4. I have personally apologized to lack.
5. It doesn't matter that I talked to them through MSN.
6. Yes I deleted Krusher off my list once he attacked me through cussing and harassment.
7. I did what was right.
8. It takes more strength and courage to tell the truth.
9. It's funny how you guys are making your own opinions without asking the people that were actually involved and how I told them the truth within hours after the game.

JesusReigns wrote:Sorry guys but I'm behind beast I've personally played his room mates on his account. I've talked to his room mates on MSN!!!. If you need proof his room mates are Zach, and Dave. I've talked to him and as a former fellow clan mate am standing behind him 100%.

Haha... Speaking to "Zach" and "Dave" on MSN doesn't prove anything as:

1) You have no idea whether these are real people. People can make up any name on MSN and come on with multiple personas. Someone who is sad enough to make claims that they are the greatest risk player in the universe when the reality is they are merely average might do something like that.

2) Even if "Zach" and "Dave" are real people, doesn't mean they play on the "Beast's" account.

3) Even if they play on his account, it is laughable to suggest that his recorded win percentages are accurate. The vaguaries of dice mean that no level of tactical astuteness can help you achieve a 98% win rate over a long period. And even the worse players on the site will win more often than his roommates, who are supposedly tutored by him, win.

If you believe wilderbeast's claims, it is not hard to understand how Krusher managed to manipulate you... I have no doubts about your character but severe doubts about your level of gullibility!

Heh I just said I stood behind Beast not that I believed that he has 95% winning. lol Beast is a nice guy but I believe that he just doesn't keep track of the games he does play.

JesusReigns wrote:Heh I just said I stood behind Beast not that I believed that he has 95% winning. lol Beast is a nice guy but I believe that he just doesn't keep track of the games he does play.

Ok - well I agree he seems a nice guy too, although his ludicrous claims detract from that somewhat, since he is clearly a liar.

I believe the highest he could possibly have is maybe 75% by himself that's just a guesstimate but that's pretty stinking awesome. But the only reason I believe he has that is he's beaten me every time that we have played through a full game. lol but heh he's a cool guy. If anything he needs to type who's in the game at the beginning each time so then he can calculate his record.

Beast said that Zach and Dave already have accounts. What are the account names? It would be interesting to see their stats.

Also, if they already have accounts and are also playing on another account don't that make them multis?

They dont play their accounts for fear of being accused of multiing. If they play a game on their account against each other or myself they're restrictions to my account have been removed (via changed password). At no point in time can they ever have access to 2 accounts. For instance Bacteria right now is playing against me in some games, consequently he has no access to my account right now. This was cleared with sully, no secret alliances and no multing. My room-mates cant play a game no their account unless all their games on my account are terminated, at no time ever is it condoned that they have access to accounts. If they play theirs, they have no access to mine, pure and simple.