The CUBE

bryguy · Post by **bryguy** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:34 am

the link u give for the xml shows plain old text, doesnt look like xml to me

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:53 am

bryguy wrote:the link u give for the xml shows plain old text, doesnt look like xml to me

Looks like pretty good XML to me...

C.

paulk · Post by **paulk** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:48 pm

I would appriciate if everybody tried to keep comments concentrated on what can be done to get this cube into play instead.

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:49 pm

I think the black background looks the best.

paulk · Post by **paulk** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:07 pm

Coleman wrote:I think the black background looks the best.

It might LOOK better, but it will be harder to concentrate on than the grey background.

ParadiceCity9 · Post by **ParadiceCity9** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:31 pm

I like the space background...but I really like space in general so maybe that's why...

Kaplowitz · Post by **Kaplowitz** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:17 pm

this one is best IMO

paulk · Post by **paulk** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:31 am

I would love to get this one into play.
Any hints on what I need to do?
And since this map is so small, only 500px*500px, does it really need a 2nd larger map?
Can someone check the xml in game mode?

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:21 am

Check how maps progress through the foundry.

And quoting that:

3. NOTE: A large map must be noticeably larger than their small map, if you must have specifics 9% larger is required but 33.3% (1/3rd) is recommended.

Rictus · Post by **Rictus** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:09 pm

I prefer the second backdrop. I'm aware there's a general body off feeling against symmetrical maps, but I am intrigued by this one...

Tisha · Post by **Tisha** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:37 pm

why three different threads about it?

makinamachine · Post by **makinamachine** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:18 pm

I would like to see the cubes in play as soon as possible.

paulk · Post by **paulk** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:35 am

New map background is out:

click thumbnail or see my first post.

Ehriggn · Post by **Ehriggn** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:48 am

me likey map! me likey map! (expecially with the new background)

looks about ready to play, and i think this will be one of my favourite new maps.

whitestazn88 · Post by **whitestazn88** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:56 am

i have a question...

why is this still in map ideas if everything such as xml and bonuses are sorted out and the only thing really holding it back is the fact that we dont know what background we want to use

paulk · Post by **paulk** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:25 am

Tisha wrote:why three different threads about it?

because there are 3 different maps.

paulk · Post by **paulk** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:27 am

whitestazn88 wrote:i have a question...

why is this still in map ideas if everything such as xml and bonuses are sorted out and the only thing really holding it back is the fact that we dont know what background we want to use

I kind of have wondered the same....

rebelman · Post by **rebelman** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:19 am

whitestazn88 wrote:i have a question...

why is this still in map ideas if everything such as xml and bonuses are sorted out and the only thing really holding it back is the fact that we dont know what background we want to use

i too agree this map has progressed a lot but is still in ideas

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:37 am

paulk wrote:
whitestazn88 wrote:i have a question...

why is this still in map ideas if everything such as xml and bonuses are sorted out and the only thing really holding it back is the fact that we dont know what background we want to use

I kind of have wondered the same....

Odd technicality. I'm going to go around it and move this finally.

For anyone who hasn't followed this and is wondering why the hell I'm moving something so early, this was developed in another topic alongside two other maps and then a new one was made so that it could be by itself.

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:47 pm

Cheeky Coleman... I know what you did last... er... move!?

C.

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:28 pm

A hypercube is a cube in 4D, so it wouldn't look like that.

paulk · Post by **paulk** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:08 am

unriggable wrote:A hypercube is a cube in 4D, so it wouldn't look like that.

Eh? So how would it look like then Einstein?

paulk · Post by **paulk** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:10 am

Coleman wrote:
paulk wrote:
whitestazn88 wrote:i have a question...

why is this still in map ideas if everything such as xml and bonuses are sorted out and the only thing really holding it back is the fact that we dont know what background we want to use

I kind of have wondered the same....

Odd technicality. I'm going to go around it and move this finally.

For anyone who hasn't followed this and is wondering why the hell I'm moving something so early, this was developed in another topic alongside two other maps and then a new one was made so that it could be by itself.

What about The CUBE? Its kind of done too?

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:51 am

paulk wrote:
unriggable wrote:A hypercube is a cube in 4D, so it wouldn't look like that.

Eh? So how would it look like then Einstein?

As far as I know the fourth dimension is time.

mibi · Post by **mibi** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:56 pm

Coleman wrote:
paulk wrote:
unriggable wrote:A hypercube is a cube in 4D, so it wouldn't look like that.

Eh? So how would it look like then Einstein?
As far as I know the fourth dimension is time.

I say we take it one step further.

The CUBE

Is The CUBE (v 53=no!, v59!!!) ready for Graphics stamp + move to Final Forge?