Conquer Club

It's ok, Norse. Both major candidates have pledged themselves to not allowing immigrants in. No matter what happens, you won't have to live with any "leeching, work-shy, long term useless bastards" seeking a better life.

Neutrino wrote:It's ok, Norse. Both major candidates have pledged themselves to not allowing immigrants in. No matter what happens, you won't have to live with any "leeching, work-shy, long term useless bastards" seeking a better life.

But how will Norse get in?!

Stopper wrote:
But how will Norse get in?!

When he says "immigrants" you know exactly what he is talking about sloppy.

People like guiscard.

Fircoal wrote:I'm voting the guy I kick in the balls. (A.K.A. LV)

Why do you have pikachu humping some girl?

I don't live in Australia, but I'm hoping you guys will seek out a socialist third party representative to elect.

Chris7He wrote:

Fircoal wrote:I'm voting the guy I kick in the balls. (A.K.A. LV)

Why do you have pikachu humping some girl?

I don't live in Australia, but I'm hoping you guys will seek out a socialist third party representative to elect.

No chance at all. The major ones are Labor and Liberal, and Labor has the greatest chance of getting in (change FTW). So sick of John Howard, as are many people.

Norse - John Howard refuses to apologise to the Aboriginal people for the things White Australians did to them for the past 200 years. He won't hold a referendum to allow something on the constitution for the Aboriginals, blah blah blah etc etc.

Many of us are not voting Socialist.. Where did you get that idea? Labor isn't Socialist, Liberal aren't Socialist, Greens, Democrats, Nation-One, blah blah blah. I haven't heard about a major Socialist electorate for, ever.

Norse wrote:

Stopper wrote:
But how will Norse get in?!

When he says "immigrants" you know exactly what he is talking about sloppy.

People like guiscard.

Actually, judging from your previous posts, you don't seem to have a very good work eithic. I may have to inform the Department of Immigration of this...

Welsome to the next 5 years of your life. Cramped, hot, in the middle of nowhere and behind a chail-link fence.

Neutrino wrote:

Norse wrote:

Stopper wrote:
But how will Norse get in?!

When he says "immigrants" you know exactly what he is talking about sloppy.

People like guiscard.

Actually, judging from your previous posts, you don't seem to have a very good work eithic. I may have to inform the Department of Immigration of this...

Welsome to the next 5 years of your life. Cramped, hot, in the middle of nowhere and behind a chail-link fence.

You know Queensland isn't the best place to advertise Australia with, right?

Skittles! wrote:
Norse - John Howard refuses to apologise to the Aboriginal people for the things White Australians did to them for the past 200 years.

Oh! I see....so John Howard personally persecuted against them single handedly did he?

From what I have heard about the land reforms/benefit system it favours the abo's "drink and wander" lifestyle. They should be content.

But anyhoo, back to civilised society...

Many of us are not voting Socialist.. Where did you get that idea? Labor isn't Socialist, Liberal aren't Socialist, Greens, Democrats, Nation-One, blah blah blah. I haven't heard about a major Socialist electorate for, ever.

There seems to be missing vital political parties in your system.....who are your local neo-nazi party?

Wtf? Howard has said he is sorry that that stuff happened to them.

I don't even know if we have a neo-nazi party.

And no, John Howard did not single-handedly persecuted against Aborigines, but as Prime Minister for 11 years or so, I'm pretty sure it's time he apologised on behalf of Australia, as other Prime Ministers have done so.

Would you like a 70 year old man as your Prime Minister, whose ways are so skewered from modern understanding?

Skoffin wrote: Wtf? Howard has said he is sorry that that stuff happened to them.

He still won't hold a referendum to whatever the crap we need to do.

He said sorry to gain more votes, if you didn't figure that out.

Skoffin wrote: Wtf? Howard has said he is sorry that that stuff happened to them.

no he didn't

Norse wrote:
Oh! I see....so John Howard personally persecuted against them single handedly did he?

I think it quite obvious that in fact he did.

Can't trust those politicians. They always turn out to be 500 year old vampires.

Norse wrote:There seems to be missing vital political parties in your system.....who are your local neo-nazi party?

We have several. You might want to try One Nation or Family First...

Skoffin wrote: Excuse me? I have never been racist in my life, and was not even alive to make such acts in the pass. So I find it insulting that I need to have a Prime minister 'apologise on behalf of me'.

Meh, either do I, but hey, many Aborigines cannot trust White Australian's due to the past, and it's only fair that we do apologise.

Because we totally fucked up their lives. It doesn't matter if we weren't there, they are still discriminated against. They're still trying to have a foothold in society, even if it doesn't look like it. Their traditions are keeping them back, no offence, but they'll keep to those traditions because White Australians weren't around them.

And sure it would be. I'll gladly do it, but it wouldn't make a difference to the women that were raped because they wouldn't trust men like before.

Skoffin wrote:Fair? How is it fair that we apologise for something we did not do and were not even around to do anything about? Would it be fair for a man to apologise on behalf of all men for the raping of women?

I suppose it's more of a symbolic thing.
"We're ashamed of what our ancestors did and we promise not to do it again"
Of course, in 300 years everyone has forgotten about that it's back to
pillagin'.

Neutrino wrote:
We have several. You might want to try One Nation or Family First...

Sounds too liberal to me.

Skoffin wrote:Fair? How is it fair that we apologise for something we did not do and were not even around to do anything about? Would it be fair for a man to apologise on behalf of all men for the raping of women?

I think I've just fallen in love....

I look forward to coming into your great nation australian partriots! It is the most excited I've ever been since I was a nipper at christmas time.

Norse wrote:

jiminski wrote:
Hating Howard is an excellent reason for voting for an alternative.

Amongst a plethora of Machiavellian actions, the man doctored photographs to justify immigration policy and nothing happened. He is a racist little tin pot fascist and an embarrassment to the nation. (sorry to interrupt)

How is he racist?

Because he doesnt want to allow leeching, work-shy, long term useless bastards in?

I was in Australia for the 2001 election where Howard falsified photographs to show boat-people throwing and threatening to throw their children overboard to avoid capture.
The whole campaign was wracked with thinly veiled racial slurs which stoked up the nationalist and right wing vote.

He played to the significant proportion of the nation which holds xenophobic views. (hey same as ours)
No offense guys but in my experience racism in Australia is fairly rife, particularly outside of the cities; Howard cynically exploited this.

So if Howard is not a racist, he is perhaps worse as he uses racism to fulfill his personal and political ambition.

Norse wrote:

Neutrino wrote:
We have several. You might want to try One Nation or Family First...

Sounds too liberal to me.

That's as close as you're going to get to a Neo-Nazi party in Australia. Nationalistic wierdoes and Nationalistic Fundamentalist Christian wierdoes

jiminski wrote:

I was in Australia for the 2001 election where Howard falsified photographs to show boat-people throwing and threatening to throw their children overboard to avoid capture.
The whole campaign was wracked with thinly veiled racial slurs which stoked up the nationalist and right wing vote.

This I am unaware of, and quite frankly will not trust your word on.

He played to the significant proportion of the nation which holds xenophobic views. (hey same as ours)

Oh yes of course jimmy, we dont allow, with our bleeding hearts and packed wallets, the unrestricted and unnessaccary movement of non-nationals, on a daily basis, to the power of a thousand into our country. Our transport, health and benefit system isn't being raped by these lovely individuals, who love us, and want to embrace our culture.


What amazes me jim, is that you live in londonistan yourself, you should be able to see what a fucking shit hole it is, such an inwardly deprived area.

Not in my south coast paradise, never. We wouldnt fucking stand for it.

Neutrino wrote:

Norse wrote:

Neutrino wrote:
We have several. You might want to try One Nation or Family First...

Sounds too liberal to me.

That's as close as you're going to get to a Neo-Nazi party in Australia. Nationalistic wierdoes and Nationalistic Fundamentalist Christian wierdoes

What in the sweet, sweet name of freya does christianity have to do with the price of mature cheddar?

Norse wrote:

Neutrino wrote:

Norse wrote:

Neutrino wrote:
We have several. You might want to try One Nation or Family First...

Sounds too liberal to me.

That's as close as you're going to get to a Neo-Nazi party in Australia. Nationalistic wierdoes and Nationalistic Fundamentalist Christian wierdoes

What in the sweet, sweet name of freya does christianity have to do with the price of mature cheddar?

That will forever remain a mystery...