Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:34 am**

yankeefan984 wrote:
freezie wrote:
yankeefan984 wrote:Talk like Yoda, you do.

But Yoda I am!

But yoda is a short green punk. Mace Windu is better.

Mace Windu rocks :wink:

A strong warrior Yoda is, though.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:34 am**

freezie wrote:
yankeefan984 wrote:
freezie wrote:
yankeefan984 wrote:Talk like Yoda, you do.

But Yoda I am!

But yoda is a short green punk. Mace Windu is better.

Mace Windu rocks

A strong warrior Yoda is, though.

If by strong you mean weak then yes.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:35 am**

Yoda is weak? Mace Windu would struggle against him, in a lightsaber duel that is.

In the force, Yoda is the strongest of all.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:36 am**

freezie wrote:
Arbustos wrote:Dictatorial.

And Hitler wasn't very wise... do you mean he was intelligent?

Thanks.

And I mean he was intelligent in a way, at least he wasn't stupid.

He was a complete racist, so basicly an idiot, but to control a few countries and start up the WWII, there HAS to be a brain somewhere. So he wasn't stupid.

Rahm beleive smart people are peaceful. This is uterly wrong.

Alright... I agree; if anything, it's wise people that are peaceful.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:37 am**

Arbustos wrote:
freezie wrote:
Arbustos wrote:Dictatorial.

And Hitler wasn't very wise... do you mean he was intelligent?

Thanks.

And I mean he was intelligent in a way, at least he wasn't stupid.

He was a complete racist, so basicly an idiot, but to control a few countries and start up the WWII, there HAS to be a brain somewhere. So he wasn't stupid.

Rahm beleive smart people are peaceful. This is uterly wrong.

Alright... I agree; if anything, it's wise people that are peaceful.

Well, yes I agree.

Gonna change that part..Thanks ( again )

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:38 am**

freezie wrote:Yoda is weak? Mace Windu would struggle against him, in a lightsaber duel that is.

In the force, Yoda is the strongest of all.

No in the force that would be the choosen one.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:59 am**

kill all the brainy ones instead. then cures for cancer etc. don't happen.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:52 am**

Serbia wrote:All this global warming nonsense is really getting on my nerves. Lets assume that there is global warming. And that it is even caused by man. Tell me, please, why the current temperature is the only temperature that we should have? Please, explain that.

Now also, I'll assume you all are good evolutionists. So, lets pretend, that the earth is ONLY 10 million years old. Very conservative, by all our evolutionary models, I'm sure you'll agree. Now, lets look at our vast data on climate. Our records date back what, about 100 years? (also, does anyone find it interesting that seemingly every high temperature record that gets broken now, was originally set in the 1930's? I tell you, sure seems like here in the Detroit area, that's where all the records come from... and, uh, there were no SUV's then, a much lower population... but I digress) So we have 100 years worth of data. Out of a possible 10 million. (being conservative) So what you're telling me, is based on your evolutionary data, you are taking .001% of our possible climate history, and using that very limited information to dictate to us what the ideal temperature for our planet should be?! Does this REALLY make sense? And tell me, how scientific a model is it if you're only looking at .001% of the data?!

Now, this doesn't even get into the argument that you people have no idea the immense size of the planet earth, and how arrogant you really are to think that humans can so affect global climate. But really, this global warming scare is just that, A SCARE. Please people, stop with the nonsense.

And to the brilliant minds who feel that we need to reduce the earth's population, do us all a huge favor then. Start with yourselves. You'll be following your climate-based religion, right?

While being very good at creating it in large groups, individual humans are actually very resistant to change. While I don't doubt global warming has been hyped up to a large extent (WE'S ALL GONNA DIE!) the amount of long term data that supports some form of global warming shows that it is probably going to happen. Some countries (Canada and the like) will probably actually benifit from global warming, as large areas become usable farmland. Of course, other areas (central US, anything near the equator) will dry out and probably become near uninhabitable.
Ultimately, global warming isn't going to make anything any "worse" than it is now, just different.

P.S. Your numbers are off by huge orders of magnitude. Also, generally reliable climate data stretches back hundreds of millions of years, not just 100 years of active recording.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:26 am**

Serbia wrote:All this global warming nonsense is really getting on my nerves. Lets assume that there is global warming. And that it is even caused by man. Tell me, please, why the current temperature is the only temperature that we should have? Please, explain that.

Now also, I'll assume you all are good evolutionists. So, lets pretend, that the earth is ONLY 10 million years old. Very conservative, by all our evolutionary models, I'm sure you'll agree. Now, lets look at our vast data on climate. Our records date back what, about 100 years? (also, does anyone find it interesting that seemingly every high temperature record that gets broken now, was originally set in the 1930's? I tell you, sure seems like here in the Detroit area, that's where all the records come from... and, uh, there were no SUV's then, a much lower population... but I digress) So we have 100 years worth of data. Out of a possible 10 million. (being conservative) So what you're telling me, is based on your evolutionary data, you are taking .001% of our possible climate history, and using that very limited information to dictate to us what the ideal temperature for our planet should be?! Does this REALLY make sense? And tell me, how scientific a model is it if you're only looking at .001% of the data?!

Now, this doesn't even get into the argument that you people have no idea the immense size of the planet earth, and how arrogant you really are to think that humans can so affect global climate. But really, this global warming scare is just that, A SCARE. Please people, stop with the nonsense.

And to the brilliant minds who feel that we need to reduce the earth's population, do us all a huge favor then. Start with yourselves. You'll be following your climate-based religion, right?

Our records of temperature goes MUCH, MUCH further than 100 years.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 4:35 am**

Well freezie, let me put this into prospect for ya. Yes, I agree that there are many violent people of intelligence throughout history. The simple fact, however, is that there are far more examples of stupid violent people throughtout history....we just don't hear about them as much because in school it's more inportant to learn about the violent smart people who led the violent stupid people.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 4:36 am**

and by the very split nature of this poll....I'm not alone in my beliefs, even if they be a bit dictorial.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:24 am**

IQ measures just how fast can human brain adapt to new tasks (BTW We develop this skills only about to an age of 16 so why 18?).

I think that IQ test proves nothing.

First time i took IQ test i was measured 83.
Second time I was measured 123.
Third time I had an 136 IQ.

Still not enough to join MENSA :!:

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:26 am**

I like the general idea Rahm, maybe not the execution

Instead of basing it on intellegence, maybe its just a purely random one where every 3rd born is sterilized, no discrimination that way!

ahaaha

also

i'll even volounteer, i dont want no cracker kids

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:31 am**

...

Natural Selection no longer exists.

Redneck trucker fuckheads now have kids in the double digits and the smart asses who are well off have two kids, tops. The smart are flooded by the idiots.

Speaking of natural selection, why isn't xtra dead if he thinks the government killed all those people, you'd think the government wouldn't mind one more casualty?

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:22 pm**

I agree with unriggable, births should be cut down especially if they are into unhealthy families/ scenarios.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:26 pm**

I bet Al Gore is in cahoots with the US government. His money he won for all those awards just go to their funds. The Global Warmimng Conspiracy will just lead us into a huge mob, and Bush will use this to gain dictatorship. :wink:

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:30 pm**

Intelligence is not a product of DNA
It is a product of your sorroundings and stimulation
Also With birth control come the question of who decides who is born?
"Quis Custodiet Custodes Ipsos"
Human naure and regretfully Immorality are important factures

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:31 pm**

klinlin wrote:Intelligiance is not a product of DNA

You DNA proves it. Interpret that how you want.

The point is, knowledge isn't but intelligence is.

Posted: **Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:29 am**

Only in part. It also depends on how much stimulation you've got in your life to use and develop that intelligence.

But anyway, this has to be the most ridiculous idea ever. Because if you decide that all people who aren't geniuses shouldn't reproduce, who would do the jobs that noone wants to do? Who is going to clean stuff? Who is going to work in the factory and lift stuff all day? Because I sure as hell couldn't. I admire those people who can, since they are vital to the society.

Conquer Club

Rahm's Solution to Everything