pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:08 am
by jonesthecurl
HitRed, serious question: did you know that the Smithsonian is now selling a facsimile of Jefferson's 'bible'? I wondered what your thought s on it were.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:08 am
by jonesthecurl
Oh, and less seriously, what God thinks about it.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:42 am
by saxitoxin
Not a good week to be a Democrat named Tim!
Trump-endorsed Hung Cao DESTROYED Tim Caine in the Virginia Senate debate tonight!
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 6:47 am
by pmac666
jusplay4fun wrote:
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.
You must love when a black community is endangered by those racist lies.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:16 am
by Votanic
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
It's not a lie. The eating of dogs, cats, and other animals perceived as not being food in the West, is widespread and well-documented.
If you wnat to argue that dogs and cats should be on the menu, in the name of multi-cultural diversity, that might at least be reasonable, though of course, ...no accounting for taste.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:16 pm
by Pack Rat
Votanic wrote:
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
It's not a lie. The eating of dogs, cats, and other animals perceived as not being food in the West, is widespread and well-documented.
If you wnat to argue that dogs and cats should be on the menu, in the name of multi-cultural diversity, that might at least be reasonable, though of course...no accounting for taste.
No accounting for taste? How many times have you been exiled from the forums? You tendencies to vomit nonsense, hate and absurdity is your trademark.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:28 pm
by jusplay4fun
Pack Rat wrote:
Votanic wrote:
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
It's not a lie. The eating of dogs, cats, and other animals perceived as not being food in the West, is widespread and well-documented.
If you wnat to argue that dogs and cats should be on the menu, in the name of multi-cultural diversity, that might at least be reasonable, though of course...no accounting for taste.[/size]
No accounting for taste? How many times have you been exiled from the forums? You tendencies to vomit nonsense, hate and absurdity is your trademark.
Spoken by one who has served several Forum bans. How many times have you been banned, from this Forum, pee-rat..............?????????....??? I lost track after 10.
Look who is calling the kettle BLACK. Let me offer you a video so you can comprehend.
The same is TRUE for your vile bile, pee-rat.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:47 pm
by Pack Rat
Still sniffing Saxi's behind, lol.
Saxi might as well eat a bullet, if he needs help from you, rotflmao!
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:38 pm
by Votanic
jusplay4fun wrote:
Pack Rat wrote:
Votanic wrote:
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
It's not a lie. The eating of dogs, cats, and other animals perceived as not being food in the West, is widespread and well-documented.
If you wnat to argue that dogs and cats should be on the menu, in the name of multi-cultural diversity, that might at least be reasonable, though of course...no accounting for taste.[/size]
No accounting for taste? How many times have you been exiled from the forums? You tendencies to vomit nonsense, hate and absurdity is your trademark.
Spoken by one who has served several Forum bans. How many times have you been banned, from this Forum, pee-rat..............?????????....??? I lost track after 10.
Look who is calling the kettle BLACK. Let me offer you a video so you can comprehend.
News to jusplay4MAGA and Votanic...I have not been banned in this Forum.
You trumpers are all lying, a trait that is ridiculously common among the cult followers. Besides being a bunch of pompous all knowing bullsh!tters.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 6:33 pm
by pmac666
Pack Rat wrote:News to jusplay4MAGA and Votanic...I have not been banned in this Forum.
You trumpers are all lying, a trait that is ridiculously common among the cult followers. Besides being a bunch of pompous all knowing bullsh!tters.
Well Saxi pretends to never heard of Tina Peters. The all knowing ends quickly when its their own.
Which is a lie ofc and only serves to play down that Trump wanted to steal the election.
Heard someone very smart speculating that Trump might face a sedicious conspiracy indictment after he lost to Kamala.
Based on what is NOT in Jack Smith writings.
Wouldnt that be awesome? lol
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 7:10 pm
by Pack Rat
This is the only and most important reason Trump needs to win in November.
Victory or Prison!
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 7:22 pm
by Dukasaur
jusplay4fun wrote:
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.
It's true enough, but I don't think it has much impact.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 8:21 pm
by pmac666
jusplay4fun wrote:
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.
Vance basically lied on every topic and got fact checked once on the one racist lie that endangers a whole community.
And maga is crying that they didnt allow him to lie on that one topic.....
Yeah so biased.
Check your freaking moral compass mr. sunday school teacher. Baby Jeebus is weeping.
More than 30 bomb threats have been made against schools, government buildings and city officials’ homes since last week, forcing evacuations and closures. Springfield also canceled its annual celebration of diversity, arts and culture in response to the threats, and on Tuesday, state police were deployed to city schools.
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.
It's true enough, but I don't think it has much impact.
Thanks for admitting to the Truth, Duk, unlike pee-mac. The VP Debate may not matter THAT much, BUT in an election that most say is SO CLOSE, that debate and the biases of the moderators may be a factor. The point is, to me, is that Vance handled that well without being nasty and vile, as Trump likely would have.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2024 7:32 am
by pmac666
When youre so pedandic into rules you surely dont vote for Trump, right?
Wanna talk about the myriad of rules he broke?
Vance got away with every lie but the one that actively endangers ppl.
You should be happy they fact checked him on that one.
Unless you want those ppl to be in danger.....
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:23 am
by Pack Rat
jusplay4fun wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.
It's true enough, but I don't think it has much impact.
Thanks for admitting to the Truth, Duk, unlike pee-mac. The VP Debate may not matter THAT much, BUT in an election that most say is SO CLOSE, that debate and the biases of the moderators may be a factor. The point is, to me, is that Vance handled that well without being nasty and vile, as Trump likely would have.
But, JD Vance lies with civility! What a fukn excuse.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2024 2:33 pm
by jusplay4fun
Pack Rat wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
pmac666 wrote:When one side is whining about fact checks you know everything you need to know.
Esp when its lies that endangers whole communities.....
The bias of the two moderators was obvious, especially when the rules stated NO Fact Checking by the Moderators and THEY violated that Rule. SAD. (Read my previous post in this thread if you are unclear on this specific issue.) This confirms the left-leaning bias by the mainstream press.
It's true enough, but I don't think it has much impact.
Thanks for admitting to the Truth, Duk, unlike pee-mac. The VP Debate may not matter THAT much, BUT in an election that most say is SO CLOSE, that debate and the biases of the moderators may be a factor. The point is, to me, is that Vance handled that well without being nasty and vile, as Trump likely would have.
But, JD Vance lies with civility! What a fukn excuse.
And when YOU, pee-rat, talk about CIVILITY, you have to curse. That is NOT civility, btw.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2024 5:29 pm
by Pack Rat
STFU!
Spoiler
Abbreviation ok?
[/b]
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2024 6:08 pm
by pmac666
The dude who cant spell names and votes for a rapist is upset about cursing?
Now thats a fkin high horse.
Re: VP Debate Vance vs. Walz
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2024 7:00 pm
by Votanic
pmac666 wrote:The dude who cant spell names and votes for a rapist is upset about cursing?
Now thats a fkin high horse.
Actually he's offended by the gross hypocrisy both Pee-rat and you constnatly display.
Curse and promote violence on your oenemies all you want, ...everyone knows you will anyway.
Just knock it off with the pearl-clutching, blowing mods for bans, and other double-standard cancel-culture tactics that you regularly try to employ.
