Conquer Club

The only thing that should be measured in cups, are boobs.

Lonous wrote:The only thing that should be measured in cups, are boobs.

So... two cups of milk?

The glass is probably an American pint, 16 ounces.

We used to get served beer in British pints here, 20 ounces. Then the bars all swapped out their glasses for the smaller ones in a veiled price jump.

2dimes wrote:The glass is probably an American pint, 16 ounces.

We used to get served beer in British pints here, 20 ounces. Then the bars all swapped out their glasses for the smaller ones in a veiled price jump.

No, I disagree.
I believe we are looking at an entity that conforms to 'cup' in both the 'container' and 'measurement' definitions of the term.

Pack Rat wrote:Damn it jusplay4MAGA, it's not a fukn cup, it's a glass. Do not screw up this intellectual thread with gibberish.

Cups are for coffee and such. Glasses are for water, beer, vodka and err bad eye sight.

Re: A cup of water

Read the Title, p-rat. Another Fatal mistake. NO SURPRISE for me; p-rat is at it AGAIN.

So politics is NOT the ONLY thing you need to learn about.

And do you know what a molecule IS? Or scientific notation? Geeees. Guess NOT.

I'm more concerned about you psychopaths wanting the glass/cup to be 100% full. I mean, have none of you ever tried drinking from 100% without your hand shaking everywhere?! It's impossible! And I'm not going to dip my head down like a duck. We haven't evolved millions of years just to mimic ducks with a container of water! COME ON PEOPLE!

DirtyDishSoap wrote:I'm more concerned about you psychopaths wanting the glass/cup to be 100% full. I mean, have none of you ever tried drinking from 100% without your hand shaking everywhere?! It's impossible! And I'm not going to dip my head down like a duck. We haven't evolved millions of years just to mimic ducks with a container of water! COME ON PEOPLE!

Thank you for pointing out the fundamental difference between NORMAL and ABNORMAL 100% full cups/glasses.
Normally 100% full cups/glassesstill leave between 5-10% of the glass unfilled, just to account for such potential situatations (i.e. 'drinking') that you so eloquently have described.

Factoring in the cup/glassfullness normalacy also bolsters my claim of the OP pictured cup/glass being at least 80% full.
Unlike wookie's (mookie's?) completely preposterous and spatially incorrect estmate of 75%.

Votanic wrote: Thank you for pointing out the fundamental difference between NORMAL and ABNORMAL 100% full cups/glasses.
Normally 100% full cups/glassesstill leave between 5-10% of the glass unfilled, just to account for such potential situatations (i.e. 'drinking') that you so eloquently have described.

Factoring in the cup/glassfullness normalacy also bolsters my claim of the OP pictured cup/glass being at least 80% full.
Unlike wookie's (mookie's?) completely preposterous and spatially incorrect estmate of 75%.

uh, i don't need to leave room for cream in my water like you ladies... filler up to the brim.

DirtyDishSoap wrote:I mean, have none of you ever tried drinking without your hand shaking everywhere?! COME ON PEOPLE!

More evidence it's a glass of vodka, first one of the day from the sounds of it. Try a straw until the shakes settle down?

jusplay4fun wrote:

Pack Rat wrote:Damn it jusplay4MAGA, it's not a fukn cup, it's a glass. Do not screw up this intellectual thread with gibberish.

Cups are for coffee and such. Glasses are for water, beer, vodka and err bad eye sight.

Re: A cup of water

Read the Title, p-rat. Another Fatal mistake. NO SURPRISE for me; p-rat is at it AGAIN.


So politics is NOT the ONLY thing you need to learn about.

And do you know what a molecule IS? Or scientific notation? Geeees. Guess NOT.

Don't be silly jusplay4MAGA, we (except your silliness) have agreed that the picture is a glass of water, alcohol or some other clear liquid, not a cup, approximately 75% full. Yes, the author of this thread had it wrong, due to his obsession of drawing in the moderator to squash free speech (is DDS MAGA a book banning/burning woke fascist?)

DirtyDishSoap wrote:BUT TRUMP WILL CALL THIS A WATER IN A CUP AND BIDEN WILL FORGET WHAT WATER IS! HURRRRR

And who is the person who injects politics into this thread? You could not wait for someone else to do so?

NOTE:

Re: Happy Memorial Day 2024 A.D.!!!
Postby DirtyDishSoap on Tue May 28, 2024 9:17 pm

jusplay4fun wrote:
DirtyDishSoap wrote:
Jesus f*ck, it's memorial day, not debate which party you like get fucked by. Shoo SHOO!


That was yesterday; today is Tuesday.

And?

How many threads do you nerds plan on dragging your politics into?

At this point, i could start a thread about a cup of water and somehow, some way, you dorks will turn into a "HURR DA LEFT! DAAAAAH! THE RIGHT!" Pick a thread and keep it there. Good God man.

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 8&t=241121

You ruined your own experiment, DDS. SAD.

Votanic wrote:

2dimes wrote:The glass is probably an American pint, 16 ounces.

We used to get served beer in British pints here, 20 ounces. Then the bars all swapped out their glasses for the smaller ones in a veiled price jump.

No, I disagree.
I believe we are looking at an entity that conforms to 'cup' in both the 'container' and 'measurement' definitions of the term.

That little glass in your picture is not the same one as in the OP. That one has no water in it and the bottom is thicker.

SOME OF US PREFER THICKER BOTTOMS

That's an even more complicated question of weights and measures.

Lonous wrote:SOME OF US PREFER THICKER BOTTOMS

mookiemcgee wrote:

Votanic wrote: Thank you for pointing out the fundamental difference between NORMAL and ABNORMAL 100% full cups/glasses.
Normally 100% full cups/glassesstill leave between 5-10% of the glass unfilled, just to account for such potential situatations (i.e. 'drinking') that you so eloquently have described.

Factoring in the cup/glassfullness normalacy also bolsters my claim of the OP pictured cup/glass being at least 80% full.
Unlike wookie's (mookie's?) completely preposterous and spatially incorrect estmate of 75%.

uh, i don't need to leave room for cream in my water like you ladies... filler up to the brim.

DirtyDishSoap wrote:I mean, have none of you ever tried drinking without your hand shaking everywhere?! COME ON PEOPLE!

More evidence it's a glass of vodka, first one of the day from the sounds of it. Try a straw until the shakes settle down?

THIS IS SLANDER! ANYONE WHO EVEN REMOTELY KNOWS ME, KNOWS THAT'S I HAVE A STRONG PREFERENCE FOR BEER!
KNOW THE KNOWS OF MY NOSE!

Much of the rancor concerning claims that the vessel displayed in the OP is not a 'cup' si likely based on confusion between the terms 'cup' and 'mug'.

For example, many might be truly surprised to learn that their morning 'cup of coffee' is actually a mug of coffee.

While the receptacle shown can be reasonably described as a 'cup', it is indeed not a mug.

However, mugs can also be made of glass.

Votanic wrote:Much of the rancor concerning claims that the vessel displayed in the OP is not a 'cup' si likely based on confusion between the terms 'cup' and 'mug'.

For example, many might be truly surprised to learn that their morning 'cup of coffee' is actually a mug of coffee.

While the receptacle shown can be reasonably described as a 'cup', it is indeed not a mug.

However, mugs can also be made of glass.

Only one confused here is you. Go take your glass mug and start your own self-serving thread. Geeezes, you always have to be the center of attention.

Pack Rat wrote:

Votanic wrote:Much of the rancor concerning claims that the vessel displayed in the OP is not a 'cup' si likely based on confusion between the terms 'cup' and 'mug'.

For example, many might be truly surprised to learn that their morning 'cup of coffee' is actually a mug of coffee.

While the receptacle shown can be reasonably described as a 'cup', it is indeed not a mug.

However, mugs can also be made of glass.

Only one confused here is you. Go take your glass mug and start your own self-serving thread. Geeezes, you always have to be the center of attention.

Au contraire.
T'is you who seems to be throwing a tissy-fit,
because people would rather discuss the particulars of servingware, that waste time engaging with anymore of your contrived and calculating, political-propaganda posts.

Stop distracting.

Pack Rat wrote:Stop distracting.

Woah, hold on a minute, rat...

Who is being distracting?
Oh surely not you by pointlessly reposting the thread's OP image.

Maybe you were hoping to distract from my brilliant summation of your entire, pathetic existence.
Here, let me repeat it:

Votanic wrote:Au contraire.
T'is you who seems to be throwing a tissy-fit,
because people would rather discuss the particulars of servingware, that waste time engaging with anymore of your contrived and calculating, political-propaganda posts.

Now that i look at it, it does look more like 75% full.

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Now that i look at it, it does look more like 75% full.

Don't do it ABNORMALLY, DDS.
Remember your DT shakes.

Votanic wrote:

Pack Rat wrote:Stop distracting.

Woah, hold on a minute, rat...

Who is being distracting?
Oh surely not you by pointlessly reposting the thread's OP image.

Maybe you were hoping to distract from my brilliant summation of your entire, pathetic existence.
Here, let me repeat it:

Votanic wrote:Au contraire.
T'is you who seems to be throwing a tissy-fit,
because people would rather discuss the particulars of servingware, that waste time engaging with anymore of your contrived and calculating, political-propaganda posts.

What kind of privileged white boy uses the term tissy-fit? A real man says hissy-fit! You must of used your urban dicktionary to sound cool....that is not possible with that bug up your @$$ kiddo.

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Now that i look at it, it does look more like 75% full.

mookiemcgee wrote:

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Now that i look at it, it does look more like 75% full.

Oh!... So now when suits you, OT's resident drunk suddenly becomes a certified expert on Weights & Measures... pleeeease.