Page 2 of 3
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:29 am
by HardAttack
i-andrei wrote:HardAttack wrote:why do we have world 2.1 usa 2.1 france 2.1, i mean what is 2.1...
why isnt it world 3.5 or usa 7.9 but 2.1...
if map maker liked to index it to say this is a different and new usa map or world map, then simply use world 2, or usa 2, why 2.1 ?
waste of ink, pehh
Because it sounds cool.
HardAttack 2.1 would sound way better than your current nickname m8
Allright andrei 5.2

Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 2:11 pm
by Swimmerdude99
From quickly looking through, this war looks incredibly close, I estimated 20-21 ATL-ICON is the lean scores from what I can see. Anyone internally wanna give an estimation?
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 5:03 pm
by iAmCaffeine
yeah, you're fucking wrong lmao
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:10 pm
by iAmCaffeine
queen victorious wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:one more request.. keep this weird shit out of the clan games
Game 19801877
that's not weird shit. that's called having fun.
i wonder what your husband thinks lol
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:19 pm
by Swimmerdude99
iAmCaffeine wrote:yeah, you're fucking wrong lmao
This isn't a very calculated response

Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:38 pm
by iAmCaffeine
do you guys plan on making the tie-breaker?
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:42 pm
by iAmCaffeine
Swimmerdude99 wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:yeah, you're fucking wrong lmao
This isn't a very calculated response

well it's a 14-11 lead to us now. meaning we need 11 games from the remaining 24. we already have about 8 of those wrapped up, meaning we need 3 wins from the last 16.
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:27 pm
by Swimmerdude99
So assuming we are doing math within the same universe:
14+8 = 22 for ICON
so my estimation was 1 off?

Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:32 am
by iAmCaffeine
Yea but you called it incredibly close. Thats where you went wrong.
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:54 am
by i-andrei
Swimmerdude99 wrote:From quickly looking through, this war looks incredibly close, I estimated 20-21 ATL-ICON is the lean scores from what I can see. Anyone internally wanna give an estimation?
Well, first of all it's a 49 game war...
I estimate it to go somewhere in the 26-23 to 28-21 range for ICON.
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:20 am
by Swimmerdude99
Yes, so I don't count games that I don't see a lean in. That would be why someone from the outside of a clan war would estimate something lower than the total score, just like I would assume any prediction from inside, would also not actually have a good gauge on 100% of the games.
As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So far all I've heard from people in the war is that the game count is 49, and that ICON could count 22 as wins. One of which I already knew, the other I was pretty close in my estimate

Perhaps I'll just pm someone from ATL to get a real answer XD
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:47 am
by iAmCaffeine
You taking this way too seriously lmao
But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 5:45 am
by i-andrei
Swimmerdude99 wrote:
As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So did you check all active 23 games? LOL
We appreciate the interest. Would you be interested in joining the winning clan?
If you apply now we let you in without any testing games xD
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:37 am
by Swimmerdude99
iAmCaffeine wrote:You taking this way too seriously lmao
But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.
Nah, just trying to get an answer

I'm always curious, this thread just doesn't have as much showboating and boasting as other thread wars, so no one has been giving lean updates or anything.
i-andrei wrote:Swimmerdude99 wrote:
As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So did you check all active 23 games? LOL
I did

looked like about 7-8ish didn't have any leans
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:39 am
by riskllama
iAmCaffeine wrote:You taking this way too seriously lmao
yup, someone sure is.
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 11:22 am
by iAmCaffeine
Swimmerdude99 wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:You taking this way too seriously lmao
But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.
Nah, just trying to get an answer

I'm always curious, this thread just doesn't have as much showboating and boasting as other thread wars, so no one has been giving lean updates or anything.
i-andrei wrote:Swimmerdude99 wrote:
As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So did you check all active 23 games? LOL
I did

looked like about 7-8ish didn't have any leans
I was banned for a month so that helps the quietness. I think most of them are scared of speaking up anyway

Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 6:38 am
by MagnusGreeol
ATL please beat ICON and silence this King Joffrey look alike former multi twerp! *aka iAmShitstain
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:23 am
by iAmCaffeine
you gonna be disappointed boo
i do find it cute that this is how upset you are over me saying you pretend to not know about PaP's multis tho.. quite the reaction for one comment
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:37 am
by MagnusGreeol
iAmCaffeine wrote:you gonna be disappointed boo
i do find it cute that this is how upset you are over me saying you pretend to not know about PaP's multis tho.. quite the reaction for one comment
Quite the reaction because you assume, and make it look like the truth, And you couldn't be further away from the fact, which is I have no clue as to who is playing Antarctica, or "if" Paul has more accounts because I haven't heard about him since the GH incident, which also was absurd, So if your going to chime in with your assumptions and play them as facts, Be ready for a showdown in yotown!
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:35 am
by HardAttack
..............
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:42 am
by Jdsizzleslice
This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:44 am
by HardAttack
[quote="Jdsizzleslice"]This banter stops [b][i][u]now[/u][/i][/b]. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.[/quote]
got you Jdsizzleslice,
i am sorry. :(
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:35 pm
by BabySasuke
this has been a stellar war!
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:37 pm
by riskllama
Jdsizzleslice wrote:This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
walls would also be an acceptable place to carry on, correct?
Re: ATL v ICON
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 2:42 pm
by i-andrei
riskllama wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
walls would also be an acceptable place to carry on, correct?
Can people that play only beta maps move elsewhere?
