Allright andrei 5.2i-andrei wrote:Because it sounds cool.HardAttack wrote:why do we have world 2.1 usa 2.1 france 2.1, i mean what is 2.1...
why isnt it world 3.5 or usa 7.9 but 2.1...
if map maker liked to index it to say this is a different and new usa map or world map, then simply use world 2, or usa 2, why 2.1 ?
waste of ink, pehh
HardAttack 2.1 would sound way better than your current nickname m8
ATL (22) vs ICON (27) - ICON Wins - Final 12/4/20
Moderator: Clan Directors
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
HardAttack
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
LEGENDS of WAR
- Swimmerdude99
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: North Carolina
Re: ATL v ICON
From quickly looking through, this war looks incredibly close, I estimated 20-21 ATL-ICON is the lean scores from what I can see. Anyone internally wanna give an estimation?
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
i wonder what your husband thinks lolqueen victorious wrote:that's not weird shit. that's called having fun.iAmCaffeine wrote:one more request.. keep this weird shit out of the clan games Game 19801877![]()

- Swimmerdude99
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: North Carolina
Re: ATL v ICON
This isn't a very calculated responseiAmCaffeine wrote:yeah, you're fucking wrong lmao
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
well it's a 14-11 lead to us now. meaning we need 11 games from the remaining 24. we already have about 8 of those wrapped up, meaning we need 3 wins from the last 16.Swimmerdude99 wrote:This isn't a very calculated responseiAmCaffeine wrote:yeah, you're fucking wrong lmao

- Swimmerdude99
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: North Carolina
Re: ATL v ICON
So assuming we are doing math within the same universe:
14+8 = 22 for ICON
so my estimation was 1 off?
14+8 = 22 for ICON
so my estimation was 1 off?
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
Swimmerdude99 wrote:From quickly looking through, this war looks incredibly close, I estimated 20-21 ATL-ICON is the lean scores from what I can see. Anyone internally wanna give an estimation?
Well, first of all it's a 49 game war...
I estimate it to go somewhere in the 26-23 to 28-21 range for ICON.
- Swimmerdude99
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: North Carolina
Re: ATL v ICON
Yes, so I don't count games that I don't see a lean in. That would be why someone from the outside of a clan war would estimate something lower than the total score, just like I would assume any prediction from inside, would also not actually have a good gauge on 100% of the games.
As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So far all I've heard from people in the war is that the game count is 49, and that ICON could count 22 as wins. One of which I already knew, the other I was pretty close in my estimate
Perhaps I'll just pm someone from ATL to get a real answer XD
As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So far all I've heard from people in the war is that the game count is 49, and that ICON could count 22 as wins. One of which I already knew, the other I was pretty close in my estimate
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
You taking this way too seriously lmao
But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.
But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.

Re: ATL v ICON
So did you check all active 23 games? LOLSwimmerdude99 wrote: As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
We appreciate the interest. Would you be interested in joining the winning clan?
If you apply now we let you in without any testing games xD
- Swimmerdude99
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: North Carolina
Re: ATL v ICON
Nah, just trying to get an answeriAmCaffeine wrote:You taking this way too seriously lmao
But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.
I didi-andrei wrote:So did you check all active 23 games? LOLSwimmerdude99 wrote: As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
I was banned for a month so that helps the quietness. I think most of them are scared of speaking up anywaySwimmerdude99 wrote:Nah, just trying to get an answeriAmCaffeine wrote:You taking this way too seriously lmao
But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.I'm always curious, this thread just doesn't have as much showboating and boasting as other thread wars, so no one has been giving lean updates or anything.
I didi-andrei wrote:So did you check all active 23 games? LOLSwimmerdude99 wrote: As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.looked like about 7-8ish didn't have any leans

- MagnusGreeol
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:39 pm
- Location: ¥- ♎ BOSTONIA ♎ -¥
- Contact:
Re: ATL v ICON
ATL please beat ICON and silence this King Joffrey look alike former multi twerp! *aka iAmShitstain

- iAmCaffeine
- Posts: 11699
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
you gonna be disappointed boo
i do find it cute that this is how upset you are over me saying you pretend to not know about PaP's multis tho.. quite the reaction for one comment
i do find it cute that this is how upset you are over me saying you pretend to not know about PaP's multis tho.. quite the reaction for one comment

- MagnusGreeol
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:39 pm
- Location: ¥- ♎ BOSTONIA ♎ -¥
- Contact:
Re: ATL v ICON
Quite the reaction because you assume, and make it look like the truth, And you couldn't be further away from the fact, which is I have no clue as to who is playing Antarctica, or "if" Paul has more accounts because I haven't heard about him since the GH incident, which also was absurd, So if your going to chime in with your assumptions and play them as facts, Be ready for a showdown in yotown!iAmCaffeine wrote:you gonna be disappointed boo
i do find it cute that this is how upset you are over me saying you pretend to not know about PaP's multis tho.. quite the reaction for one comment

-
HardAttack
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
..............
Last edited by HardAttack on Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:26 pm, edited 5 times in total.
- Jdsizzleslice
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:55 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: ATL v ICON
This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
-
HardAttack
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm
Re: ATL v ICON
[quote="Jdsizzleslice"]This banter stops [b][i][u]now[/u][/i][/b]. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.[/quote]
got you Jdsizzleslice,
i am sorry. :(
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.[/quote]
got you Jdsizzleslice,
i am sorry. :(
- BabySasuke
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2017 8:31 am
Re: ATL v ICON
walls would also be an acceptable place to carry on, correct?Jdsizzleslice wrote:This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.

Re: ATL v ICON
Can people that play only beta maps move elsewhere?riskllama wrote:walls would also be an acceptable place to carry on, correct?Jdsizzleslice wrote:This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.
The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.
Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
