ATL (22) vs ICON (27) - ICON Wins - Final 12/4/20

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
HardAttack
Posts: 1935
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by HardAttack »

i-andrei wrote:
HardAttack wrote:why do we have world 2.1 usa 2.1 france 2.1, i mean what is 2.1...
why isnt it world 3.5 or usa 7.9 but 2.1...

if map maker liked to index it to say this is a different and new usa map or world map, then simply use world 2, or usa 2, why 2.1 ?
waste of ink, pehh
Because it sounds cool.

HardAttack 2.1 would sound way better than your current nickname m8
Allright andrei 5.2 :lol:
LEGENDS of WAR
User avatar
Swimmerdude99
Posts: 2581
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by Swimmerdude99 »

From quickly looking through, this war looks incredibly close, I estimated 20-21 ATL-ICON is the lean scores from what I can see. Anyone internally wanna give an estimation?
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by iAmCaffeine »

yeah, you're fucking wrong lmao
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by iAmCaffeine »

queen victorious wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:one more request.. keep this weird shit out of the clan games Game 19801877
that's not weird shit. that's called having fun. O:)
i wonder what your husband thinks lol
Image
User avatar
Swimmerdude99
Posts: 2581
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by Swimmerdude99 »

iAmCaffeine wrote:yeah, you're fucking wrong lmao
This isn't a very calculated response :(
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by iAmCaffeine »

do you guys plan on making the tie-breaker?
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Swimmerdude99 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:yeah, you're fucking wrong lmao
This isn't a very calculated response :(
well it's a 14-11 lead to us now. meaning we need 11 games from the remaining 24. we already have about 8 of those wrapped up, meaning we need 3 wins from the last 16.
Image
User avatar
Swimmerdude99
Posts: 2581
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by Swimmerdude99 »

So assuming we are doing math within the same universe:
14+8 = 22 for ICON

so my estimation was 1 off? :-k
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Yea but you called it incredibly close. Thats where you went wrong.
Image
User avatar
i-andrei
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:33 am
Contact:

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by i-andrei »

Swimmerdude99 wrote:From quickly looking through, this war looks incredibly close, I estimated 20-21 ATL-ICON is the lean scores from what I can see. Anyone internally wanna give an estimation?

Well, first of all it's a 49 game war...
I estimate it to go somewhere in the 26-23 to 28-21 range for ICON.
User avatar
Swimmerdude99
Posts: 2581
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by Swimmerdude99 »

Yes, so I don't count games that I don't see a lean in. That would be why someone from the outside of a clan war would estimate something lower than the total score, just like I would assume any prediction from inside, would also not actually have a good gauge on 100% of the games.

As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.

So far all I've heard from people in the war is that the game count is 49, and that ICON could count 22 as wins. One of which I already knew, the other I was pretty close in my estimate :) Perhaps I'll just pm someone from ATL to get a real answer XD
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by iAmCaffeine »

You taking this way too seriously lmao

But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.
Image
User avatar
i-andrei
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:33 am
Contact:

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by i-andrei »

Swimmerdude99 wrote: As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So did you check all active 23 games? LOL
We appreciate the interest. Would you be interested in joining the winning clan?

If you apply now we let you in without any testing games xD
User avatar
Swimmerdude99
Posts: 2581
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by Swimmerdude99 »

iAmCaffeine wrote:You taking this way too seriously lmao

But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.
Nah, just trying to get an answer :D I'm always curious, this thread just doesn't have as much showboating and boasting as other thread wars, so no one has been giving lean updates or anything.
i-andrei wrote:
Swimmerdude99 wrote: As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So did you check all active 23 games? LOL
I did :) looked like about 7-8ish didn't have any leans
Image
User avatar
riskllama
Posts: 9025
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by riskllama »

iAmCaffeine wrote:You taking this way too seriously lmao
yup, someone sure is.
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Swimmerdude99 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You taking this way too seriously lmao

But if you wanna talk to ATL then I recommend shoop or tin. The rest are a bit slow.
Nah, just trying to get an answer :D I'm always curious, this thread just doesn't have as much showboating and boasting as other thread wars, so no one has been giving lean updates or anything.
i-andrei wrote:
Swimmerdude99 wrote: As they stand, the ones that are leaning one way or another, it looked to me like ATL was 20 and ICON had 21. These counts are based on leans/locks from what I can see. Not a declarative number or attempting to predict an end game score.
So did you check all active 23 games? LOL
I did :) looked like about 7-8ish didn't have any leans
I was banned for a month so that helps the quietness. I think most of them are scared of speaking up anyway :?
Image
User avatar
MagnusGreeol
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:39 pm
Location: ¥- ♎ BOSTONIA ♎ -¥
Contact:

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by MagnusGreeol »

ATL please beat ICON and silence this King Joffrey look alike former multi twerp! *aka iAmShitstain
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by iAmCaffeine »

you gonna be disappointed boo

i do find it cute that this is how upset you are over me saying you pretend to not know about PaP's multis tho.. quite the reaction for one comment
Image
User avatar
MagnusGreeol
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:39 pm
Location: ¥- ♎ BOSTONIA ♎ -¥
Contact:

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by MagnusGreeol »

iAmCaffeine wrote:you gonna be disappointed boo

i do find it cute that this is how upset you are over me saying you pretend to not know about PaP's multis tho.. quite the reaction for one comment
Quite the reaction because you assume, and make it look like the truth, And you couldn't be further away from the fact, which is I have no clue as to who is playing Antarctica, or "if" Paul has more accounts because I haven't heard about him since the GH incident, which also was absurd, So if your going to chime in with your assumptions and play them as facts, Be ready for a showdown in yotown!
Image
HardAttack
Posts: 1935
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by HardAttack »

..............
Last edited by HardAttack on Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:26 pm, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
Jdsizzleslice
Posts: 3576
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:55 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by Jdsizzleslice »

This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.

The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.

Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
HardAttack
Posts: 1935
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by HardAttack »

[quote="Jdsizzleslice"]This banter stops [b][i][u]now[/u][/i][/b]. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.

The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.

Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.[/quote]

got you Jdsizzleslice,

i am sorry. :(
User avatar
BabySasuke
Posts: 852
Joined: Sat May 13, 2017 8:31 am

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by BabySasuke »

this has been a stellar war!
Image
User avatar
riskllama
Posts: 9025
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by riskllama »

Jdsizzleslice wrote:This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.

The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.

Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
walls would also be an acceptable place to carry on, correct?
Image
User avatar
i-andrei
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:33 am
Contact:

Re: ATL v ICON

Post by i-andrei »

riskllama wrote:
Jdsizzleslice wrote:This banter stops now. Move this to Private Message or General Discussion Forum.

The LHDD vs. TOP topic has been locked due to all of your recent bickering.

Continue, and you will have more problems than just locking topics you happen to be a part of. This goes for everyone.
walls would also be an acceptable place to carry on, correct?
Can people that play only beta maps move elsewhere? :roll:
Post Reply

Return to “Complete Challenges”