Conquer Club

jonesthecurl wrote:california is "ainrofilac" backwards.
Learn to spell, my friend.

Sorry dude, I'm illiterate, that's why I created the thread for Sym to chime in and help folks, such as myself and Karel, to construct a semi-coherent sentence. Too daunting of a challenge I guess.

saxitoxin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Poster you'd most like to meet in RL?

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=12285#p4977433

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Saxi

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=12285#p4977433

DirtyDishSoap wrote:What in the actual f*ck? So if I pork someone down in Cali, I should immediately get myself checked?

IOW, the first thing DDS did after announcing he wanted to meet me IRL was to research the sex laws in California.

You gotta pretty high opinion of yourself, DDS.

In my world, I'm always number one, and number one always has to look out for himself first.

Thorthoth wrote:suxisux, has built a compelling case against you, DDS.
Maybe it's time to come out of the closet about...
1. Your gayness.
&
2. Your incredibly bad taste in men (or whatever suxi is...)

1. I'll suck your dick for $5.

2. You're a virgin, you have no opinion on what is and isn't bad taste.

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:It's designed to slowly erode the rights granted by the first amendment, until it no longer exists, and like the frog we've been boiled without noticing it.

-TG

First they demand a cake for their wedding, now they are boiling frogs to death????

Next they'll be marrying animals. Phatscotty was right all along.

Skoffin wrote: Politicians tend to be pro-anything-that-fucks-up-your-life-long-term. It's why they love medical debt and hate abortions.

Nailed it!

mrswdk wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:It's designed to slowly erode the rights granted by the first amendment, until it no longer exists, and like the frog we've been boiled without noticing it.

-TG

First they demand a cake for their wedding, now they are boiling frogs to death????

Next they'll be marrying animals. Phatscotty was right all along.

Not only that they'll be marrying boiled frogs while sliding down a slippery slope eating gay Boy Scout thin mints..

jonesthecurl wrote:

mrswdk wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:It's designed to slowly erode the rights granted by the first amendment, until it no longer exists, and like the frog we've been boiled without noticing it.

-TG

First they demand a cake for their wedding, now they are boiling frogs to death????

Next they'll be marrying animals. Phatscotty was right all along.

Not only that they'll be marrying boiled frogs while sliding down a slippery slope eating gay Boy Scout thin mints..

Y'all are laughing, yet Obama expanded the powers of the patriot act, allowing unchecked invasion of electronic transmissions. If they rifled through people's paper mail like this there'd be an outcry. This is just another example.

It's the nature of government to constrict. Each right we believe we have will eventually be taken away while we're distracted with pan et circenses. It's an inevitability.

Not that a couple of the queen's subjects would understand.

-TG

"panem".

Can't say my grasp of Latin is all that great.

-TG

Saw a cute poster on facebook today:

"If I pasted the Constitution in an email, do you think the government would finally take the time to read it?"

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

jonesthecurl wrote:

mrswdk wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:It's designed to slowly erode the rights granted by the first amendment, until it no longer exists, and like the frog we've been boiled without noticing it.

-TG

First they demand a cake for their wedding, now they are boiling frogs to death????

Next they'll be marrying animals. Phatscotty was right all along.

Not only that they'll be marrying boiled frogs while sliding down a slippery slope eating gay Boy Scout thin mints..

Y'all are laughing, yet Obama expanded the powers of the patriot act, allowing unchecked invasion of electronic transmissions. If they rifled through people's paper mail like this there'd be an outcry. This is just another example.

It's the nature of government to constrict. Each right we believe we have will eventually be taken away while we're distracted with pan et circenses. It's an inevitability.

Not that a couple of the queen's subjects would understand.

-TG

Okay I've upgraded you from Phatscotty to warmonger.

Thanks. I don't think i get as much tail as warmonger, though, that guy is ballin'.

-TG

It was probably meant to be an insult. But I'll take it. Ballin baby.

Good one Doom.

One of my favorite rappers.

I used to think legalizing beastiality was laughing matter, but then one day I realized animalkin genders was the missing link. Cuz if someone identifies as a cat person, and everyone recognizes they are a cat person, who can stop them from marrying a cat, and why would anyone stop them? "Ya know, beaseality used to be illegal in some States too and now look it's totally normal! So don't be so quick to stop sibling marriages or dads marrying their daughters at 14. Love is love NO H8!". The Bible says incest is wrong, therefore it must be right. Top porn earners in another civilized industrialized advanced democratic western country is a set of twin brothers. See!

Hey, at least we are now like the rest of the civilized western countries!!!

I still think it's a laughing matter. If a shepherd and his flock are on really good terms, where's the harm?

@PS Just for the sake of argument, why shouldn’t two brothers be allowed to make gay porn together?

mrswdk wrote:@PS Just for the sake of argument, why shouldn’t two brothers be allowed to make gay porn together?

The children will be inbred, or maybe vegan.

mrswdk wrote:@PS Just for the sake of argument, why shouldn’t two brothers be allowed to make gay porn together?

is this actually true?