Conquer Club

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:So, take my reason or leave it - but "clever" sign offs don't win arguments; substance does.

2015-07-04 02:26:42 - Orwell: Fuck off.

Right. I thought you might reply with substance. My mistake.

So yeah, there is nothing quite like a "gotcha" moment that I already acknowledged and apologized for in my initial post.

Orwell wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:So, take my reason or leave it - but "clever" sign offs don't win arguments; substance does.

2015-07-04 02:26:42 - Orwell: Fuck off.

Right. I thought you might reply with substance. My mistake.

So yeah, there is nothing quite like a "gotcha" moment that I already acknowledged and apologized for in my initial post.

In other words, stop trying to sound all high and mighty. You really are just like everyone else. You can't shout about "substance" in one discussion while spewing profanity in another. Ironic you calling out an opponent for being a hypocrite, and me for my "subtle insults". You stick to your subtle condescending remarks and hypocritical actions. I'm done wasting time on you.

Bollocks.

Orwell wrote: f*ck off.

ahhhh, furthering the discourse in a manner that befits you and your whining ways... i'm glad the accused came into the thread to explain the situation, especially since you didn't notify him of this report... *snicker*... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:So, take my reason or leave it - but "clever" sign offs don't win arguments; substance does.

2015-07-04 02:26:42 - Orwell: Fuck off.

Right. I thought you might reply with substance. My mistake.

So yeah, there is nothing quite like a "gotcha" moment that I already acknowledged and apologized for in my initial post.

In other words, stop trying to sound all high and mighty. You really are just like everyone else. You can't shout about "substance" in one discussion while spewing profanity in another. Ironic you calling out an opponent for being a hypocrite, and me for my "subtle insults". You stick to your subtle condescending remarks and hypocritical actions. I'm done wasting time on you.

Nice try - but conflating arguments and removing context doesn't make your attempts to discredit me more viable. And really, your time does not reflect on me but that is another matter altogether. Ta ta.

Nice spin. You make yourself seem so... innocent.
Until...

Barksdale wrote:But check out the log and the chat and you will see who the idiot is. Orwell, just be glad you can cuss me behind a keyboard because I can assure you that you aren't man enough for me little boy. I know your kind and I'm sorry people picked on you when you were a kid

Ah yes, the threat. I am not hiding behind a keyboard - I have to use a keyboard to communicate, just like you - and right, you have no idea who I am, what I do, or what I know - so making threats against me and assuming to know "my kind" speaks directly to your arrogance - the one I encountered in the game (obviously, anyone reading the full chat log will see I asked you twice, quite politely, to accept an alternative) and the one that led you to hold me hostage. Because, the "choice" you gave was take a card and die or wait and be taken out. That is a hostage situation. So thank you for defining that. And for the personal threats.
Real stand up stuff.

It took you 11 days to think of a comeback? Shut up. Let it die.

Bollocks.

Serbia wrote:It took you 11 days to think of a comeback?

Nope - just saw his post yesterday. I had my say. And you can follow your own advice.

Orwell wrote:

Serbia wrote:It took you 11 days to think of a comeback?

Nope - just saw his post yesterday. I had my say. And you can follow your own advice.

Bullshit. You responded in this thread twice after Barksdale posted. Or do you admit you don't pay attention to things? You're a joke, and you don't know when to quit. And coming back to this thread 11 days later makes you petty, insecure, and small. Now do yourself a favor and shut up.

Bollocks.

Keep talking Serbia, I'm enjoying this.

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:

Serbia wrote:It took you 11 days to think of a comeback?

Nope - just saw his post yesterday. I had my say. And you can follow your own advice.

Bullshit. You responded in this thread twice after Barksdale posted. Or do you admit you don't pay attention to things? You're a joke, and you don't know when to quit. And coming back to this thread 11 days later makes you petty, insecure, and small. Now do yourself a favor and shut up.

Bollocks.

Your idea of a "gotcha" post is pretty hilarious. Your "rage" is something else.
Again, I had my say *to him* - now, follow your own advice.

Orwell wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:

Serbia wrote:It took you 11 days to think of a comeback?

Nope - just saw his post yesterday. I had my say. And you can follow your own advice.

Bullshit. You responded in this thread twice after Barksdale posted. Or do you admit you don't pay attention to things? You're a joke, and you don't know when to quit. And coming back to this thread 11 days later makes you petty, insecure, and small. Now do yourself a favor and shut up.

Bollocks.

Your idea of a "gotcha" post is pretty hilarious. Your "rage" is something else.
Again, I had my say *to him* - now, follow your own advice.

Not a "gotcha" post, but that you do in fact feel "got" is telling. So, are you going to be able to stop yourself? I'm betting on "no". You've lost face, you've been called out on it, and you just cannot help yourself. Again, I shall invite you to show restraint, and shut up.

Bollocks.

Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.

Sorry, I thought leaping in with trumped up language to make rash personal judgements was rage. I stand corrected.

I fail to see the trumped up language or rash personal judgements in HIS posts.

Orwell wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.

Sorry, I thought leaping in with trumped up language to make rash personal judgements was rage. I stand corrected.

Since you are totally incapable of checking yourself, show me some examples. You'd be better off following my advice, and figure out that now is the perfect time for you to shut up, but since we both know better, I shall indulge you, and give you a chance to prove your point.

Pro-tip: You can't. Please, don't waste your time or continue to embarrass yourself further, and shut up.

Bollocks.

Serbia wrote: makes you and small.

Bit rash, the truth is "minuscule".

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.

Sorry, I thought leaping in with trumped up language to make rash personal judgements was rage. I stand corrected.

Since you are totally incapable of checking yourself, show me some examples. You'd be better off following my advice, and figure out that now is the perfect time for you to shut up, but since we both know better, I shall indulge you, and give you a chance to prove your point.

Pro-tip: You can't. Please, don't waste your time or continue to embarrass yourself further, and shut up.

Bollocks.

Simultaneously telling me to shut up while trying to bully me into proving a point I already made doesn't win you the argument. It does shoe the dishonesty of your approach. As for examples - you have provided plenty.
I stand by my previous statements. End of discussion.

boy, you sure shoed him...

Orwell wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.

Sorry, I thought leaping in with trumped up language to make rash personal judgements was rage. I stand corrected.

Since you are totally incapable of checking yourself, show me some examples. You'd be better off following my advice, and figure out that now is the perfect time for you to shut up, but since we both know better, I shall indulge you, and give you a chance to prove your point.

Pro-tip: You can't. Please, don't waste your time or continue to embarrass yourself further, and shut up.

Bollocks.

Simultaneously telling me to shut up while trying to bully me into proving a point I already made doesn't win you the argument. It does shoe the dishonesty of your approach. As for examples - you have provided plenty.
I stand by my previous statements. End of discussion.

Still addicted to responding eh? I don't need to bully you into responding, we all know you will. But come on, since you're going to take the time to respond anyway, show some examples. I'm not seeing it, oh wise one, so please, use your "superior intellect" and show some. Stating something without proving it doesn't make any points. While you're pointing out examples of my "trumped up language", you might as well attempt to show which are the "dishonest statements" that you're accusing me of making. Or do you just throw out accusations to try to bully me from responding further? From my point of view, you're the one being the bully, and it's disgusting. (see how ridiculous and unsubstantiated accusations work? both ways) As far as winning the argument, I'll let others decide that one. And this discussion hasn't ended dude. Not until you take my advice, stop embarrassing yourself, and shut up.

Also, the word you were looking for is "show", not shoe. You're welcome!

Bollocks.

Did that fucking guy take a fucking card and fucking die yet or fucking what ?

hey!!! there's a hole in my show...

Coler wrote:Did that fucking guy take a fucking card and fucking die yet or fucking what ?

He never took the card. Barksdale was kind enough to kill him two whole days before he won the game. What a gent.

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Orwell wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.

Sorry, I thought leaping in with trumped up language to make rash personal judgements was rage. I stand corrected.

Since you are totally incapable of checking yourself, show me some examples. You'd be better off following my advice, and figure out that now is the perfect time for you to shut up, but since we both know better, I shall indulge you, and give you a chance to prove your point.

Pro-tip: You can't. Please, don't waste your time or continue to embarrass yourself further, and shut up.

Bollocks.

Simultaneously telling me to shut up while trying to bully me into proving a point I already made doesn't win you the argument. It does shoe the dishonesty of your approach. As for examples - you have provided plenty.
I stand by my previous statements. End of discussion.

Still addicted to responding eh? I don't need to bully you into responding, we all know you will. But come on, since you're going to take the time to respond anyway, show some examples. I'm not seeing it, oh wise one, so please, use your "superior intellect" and show some. Stating something without proving it doesn't make any points. While you're pointing out examples of my "trumped up language", you might as well attempt to show which are the "dishonest statements" that you're accusing me of making. Or do you just throw out accusations to try to bully me from responding further? From my point of view, you're the one being the bully, and it's disgusting. (see how ridiculous and unsubstantiated accusations work? both ways) As far as winning the argument, I'll let others decide that one. And this discussion hasn't ended dude. Not until you take my advice, stop embarrassing yourself, and shut up.

Also, the word you were looking for is "show", not shoe. You're welcome!

Bollocks.

Dishonesty in approach, not statement.

"Shoe" was autocorrect. Way to score.

I'm going to point out now that Orwell has me on his foe list. For those who don't know, this means that my posts are automatically hidden from him. When he sees I have answered, he could stay out of the thread, but he chooses to enter. Then he has to click the button to display my post, and then after reading it, respond. Seems Orwell just can't quit me.

Orwell, I'm going to make this big, so you can't miss it:
Shut up. Leave this thread, and stop responding. You are making yourself look like an idiot.

Bollocks.

Serbia wrote:I'm going to point out now that Orwell has me on his foe list. For those who don't know, this means that my posts are automatically hidden from him. When he sees I have answered, he could stay out of the thread, but he chooses to enter. Then he has to click the button to display my post, and then after reading it, respond. Seems Orwell just can't quit me.

Orwell, I'm going to make this big, so you can't miss it:
Shut up. Leave this thread, and stop responding. You are making yourself look like an idiot.

Bollocks.

Actually, yes, I foe'd you to keep you out of my games - and I happen to be subscribed to the thread so I receive emails when someone posts... so yet another failed "gotcha" moment. Keep that up. Winning.

Here's the thing: I don't care if *you* think I am making a fool of myself and no, I won't shut up because you say so - those are just two of the many fallacies in arguments that you have been throwing my way. Then there are the personal attacks and the grandstanding as if an adoring public cares that you are trying to prove something horrible about me. In truth, everything I have written in this thread is pretty cut and dry - but every time you jump into this thread, it's with both feet to come after me.

So bait and bully all you want but that reflects on you, not me.