i have found lanlar on facebook. he seems to have a fetish for monkeys with guns, getting duck dynasty characters back on tv, and elmer fudd...
i shit you not
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:17 pm
by owenshooter
Keefie wrote:Yes you paid your money, but by signing up you also agreed to abide by the rules of the site.
you are brave adding your name to this class action lawsuit... anyone in this thread is going to be held liable for at least 6 million, AT LEAST. and of all the people that have threatened lawsuits in the past over bans, how many have ever won? i think that number is a resounding ZERO... i look forward to the ruling on this matter, but i must admit, this thread could be the most entertainment this sub-forum has seen in a long while...-Jésus noir
p.s.-anyone else find it interesting that the user did not defend against the accusations, just threatened lawsuits? must not realize 2 on that list have already been placed into the "GUEST" group...
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:36 pm
by clangfield
Lanlar wrote:To clarify on your question of who I will file against.
EVERY PERSON THAT POSTED
Can't wait to see how that plays out in a court in a different country... you see over here, one can't just sue someone, you have to be suing them for something, usually a breach of a law of some sort. I don't think asking a question in a forum, which has in fact been answered, is going to see me at the Old Bailey... For a change, though, I agree with Owen ( )... methinks he doth protest too much.
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:16 pm
by king achilles
Locking this for obvious reasons.
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 4:50 am
by sniffie
Riverrun seems to be clean, yet I have noted him for future reference.
Yatti and Lanlar have one week vacation
xthelmax and tripwire8 where already busted
steelz246,thorn25, iron99 and dodner7 are busted
Kilam and pete543 seem clean
Keep this topic clean boys and gals
Sniff
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 10:16 am
by owenshooter
sniffie wrote:Riverrun seems to be clean, yet I have noted him for future reference.
Yatti and Lanlar have one week vacation
xthelmax and tripwire8 where already busted
steelz246,thorn25, iron99 and dodner7 are busted
Kilam and pete543 seem clean
Keep this topic clean boys and gals
Sniff
good job... that took forever to sort out... very complicate in the end... good catch and good job to the mod squad...-Jésus noir
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 4:42 pm
by sniffie
owenshooter wrote:
sniffie wrote:Riverrun seems to be clean, yet I have noted him for future reference.
Yatti and Lanlar have one week vacation
xthelmax and tripwire8 where already busted
steelz246,thorn25, iron99 and dodner7 are busted
Kilam and pete543 seem clean
Keep this topic clean boys and gals
Sniff
good job... that took forever to sort out... very complicate in the end... good catch and good job to the mod squad...-Jésus noir
Thank you Owen, and indeed. It was quite the unwrapping I had to do.
sniff
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:28 pm
by WILLIAMS5232
guess we need to start pooling our resources together for the impending federal lawsuit,
i hope johnny c. isn't too busy.
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 11:27 pm
by Dukasaur
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:guess we need to start pooling our resources together for the impending federal lawsuit,
i hope johnny c. isn't too busy.
Lanlar wrote:I suggest you review laws governing monetary payments and the requirements of negating the transactional duties. You will discover I have an actionable claim.
Hell the screenshots of your posts is a 6 million dollar claim.
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2015 9:05 am
by owenshooter
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:guess we need to start pooling our resources together for the impending federal lawsuit,
i hope johnny c. isn't too busy.
i was just literally thinking this when i saw someone had posted in this thread...-Jésus noir
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:10 pm
by notyou2
So the one week vacation. I assume it is no posting etc, but can still take turns. How is that a deterrent to one that doesn't post?
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:46 pm
by owenshooter
notyou2 wrote:So the one week vacation. I assume it is no posting etc, but can still take turns. How is that a deterrent to one that doesn't post?
same question...-Jn
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 1:04 pm
by Riverrun
I didn't know this was going on. Thanks for posting the results Owenshooter.
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:guess we need to start pooling our resources together for the impending federal lawsuit,
i hope johnny c. isn't too busy.
Lanlar wrote:I suggest you review laws governing monetary payments and the requirements of negating the transactional duties. You will discover I have an actionable claim.
Hell the screenshots of your posts is a 6 million dollar claim.
Re: sneaky tactics[sn]
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:10 am
by owenshooter
and now, this was just dropped into my inbox. funny, i read the thread and can't find my accusations... looks like i'll be receiving a lawsuit in the mail at some point, since i'm not removing any posts. the black jesus is amused...-Jésus noir
Lanlar wrote:You left posts about Yatti cheating ...HE DOES NOT CHEAT ... remove them or I will get a Federal Judge ruling to do so. However, that will require me to prove the dice are not random meaning you are guilty of gross consumer fraud.
No one is cheating let it go .... I like the game and do not want to put CC into bankruptcy.
DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS MESSAGE ....................
)... methinks he doth protest too much.