Conquer Club

chapcrap wrote:I've been told in the past that doing this type of thing for medals was ok. Not with NR's, but with various people who may be low ranked. I was told it was ok to do with private games and invitations to the players as long as it was for medals. If that's really true, I don't see a case here unless we want to change that precedent I was given.

If that were really true, all anybody has to say in the future is:"I did it for medals".

Somehow that doesn't sound quite right.

Lx

Lindax wrote:

chapcrap wrote:I've been told in the past that doing this type of thing for medals was ok. Not with NR's, but with various people who may be low ranked. I was told it was ok to do with private games and invitations to the players as long as it was for medals. If that's really true, I don't see a case here unless we want to change that precedent I was given.

If that were really true, all anybody has to say in the future is:"I did it for medals".

Somehow that doesn't sound quite right.

Lx

Only thing is 95% or more of the low rankers he joins joined in late December and have a N/A rating. Which constitute some type of him joining while they were still New Recruits.

Jdsizzleslice wrote:

Lindax wrote:

chapcrap wrote:I've been told in the past that doing this type of thing for medals was ok. Not with NR's, but with various people who may be low ranked. I was told it was ok to do with private games and invitations to the players as long as it was for medals. If that's really true, I don't see a case here unless we want to change that precedent I was given.

If that were really true, all anybody has to say in the future is:"I did it for medals".

Somehow that doesn't sound quite right.

Lx

Only thing is 95% or more of the low rankers he joins joined in late December and have a N/A rating. Which constitute some type of him joining while they were still New Recruits.

So what? Why is there this proliferation of people that think that joining games against nr's is against the rules.

lacks exact words regarding the rule...


lackattack wrote:
This does not mean you will get in trouble for joining a game here and there with many new recruits. We are only talking about the systematic targeting of new recruits.


As jr stated earlier, he has over 200 active games and only a very small % of these games have nr's in them.

This case is a joke and needs to go away quickly.

demonfork wrote:

Jdsizzleslice wrote:

Lindax wrote:

chapcrap wrote:I've been told in the past that doing this type of thing for medals was ok. Not with NR's, but with various people who may be low ranked. I was told it was ok to do with private games and invitations to the players as long as it was for medals. If that's really true, I don't see a case here unless we want to change that precedent I was given.

If that were really true, all anybody has to say in the future is:"I did it for medals".

Somehow that doesn't sound quite right.

Lx

Only thing is 95% or more of the low rankers he joins joined in late December and have a N/A rating. Which constitute some type of him joining while they were still New Recruits.

So what? Why is there this proliferation of people that think that joining games against nr's is against the rules.

lacks exact words regarding the rule...


lackattack wrote:
This does not mean you will get in trouble for joining a game here and there with many new recruits. We are only talking about the systematic targeting of new recruits.


As jr stated earlier, he has over 200 active games and only a very small % of these games have nr's in them.

This case is a joke and needs to go away quickly.

Actually, the scale of games that include NR's to games that don't is a 5:2 scale.

Jdsizzleslice wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Jdsizzleslice wrote:

Lindax wrote:

chapcrap wrote:I've been told in the past that doing this type of thing for medals was ok. Not with NR's, but with various people who may be low ranked. I was told it was ok to do with private games and invitations to the players as long as it was for medals. If that's really true, I don't see a case here unless we want to change that precedent I was given.

If that were really true, all anybody has to say in the future is:"I did it for medals".

Somehow that doesn't sound quite right.

Lx

Only thing is 95% or more of the low rankers he joins joined in late December and have a N/A rating. Which constitute some type of him joining while they were still New Recruits.

So what? Why is there this proliferation of people that think that joining games against nr's is against the rules.

lacks exact words regarding the rule...


lackattack wrote:
This does not mean you will get in trouble for joining a game here and there with many new recruits. We are only talking about the systematic targeting of new recruits.


As jr stated earlier, he has over 200 active games and only a very small % of these games have nr's in them.

This case is a joke and needs to go away quickly.

Actually, the scale of games that include NR's to games that don't is a 5:2 scale.

So 20% of his games have nr's in them, which like I said is a small %.

Again, there is no rule against this, nowhere does it say that jr can't play against nr's

demonfork wrote:

Jdsizzleslice wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Jdsizzleslice wrote:

Lindax wrote:

chapcrap wrote:I've been told in the past that doing this type of thing for medals was ok. Not with NR's, but with various people who may be low ranked. I was told it was ok to do with private games and invitations to the players as long as it was for medals. If that's really true, I don't see a case here unless we want to change that precedent I was given.

If that were really true, all anybody has to say in the future is:"I did it for medals".

Somehow that doesn't sound quite right.

Lx

Only thing is 95% or more of the low rankers he joins joined in late December and have a N/A rating. Which constitute some type of him joining while they were still New Recruits.

So what? Why is there this proliferation of people that think that joining games against nr's is against the rules.

lacks exact words regarding the rule...


lackattack wrote:
This does not mean you will get in trouble for joining a game here and there with many new recruits. We are only talking about the systematic targeting of new recruits.


As jr stated earlier, he has over 200 active games and only a very small % of these games have nr's in them.

This case is a joke and needs to go away quickly.

Actually, the scale of games that include NR's to games that don't is a 5:2 scale.

So 20% of his games have nr's in them, which like I said is a small %.

Again, there is no rule against this, nowhere does it say that jr can't play against nr's

No, that's opposite to what you're saying. 20 games with NR's, 8 without, just on the first page alone. 2nd page contained only 4 games that had no New players in them.

No, the problem is the whole selective and paranoid persecution of players who do something different than the angry mobs interpretation of what they think should be the rules. It even goes to the point where admin is apparently forced to stretch rules and even create new ones even in the midst of a determination of any players guilt. Each new report adds more room and gives license for more selective and paranoid discussions such as this. Don't worry, at this rate, Officers will no longer be able to play any enlisted ranks without cries of some kind of farming. LOL. This particular section of CC has long been a joke, and as you can see, it still is.

Systematically Farming "New Recruits"
If you are found guilty of New Recruit Farming---that is, systematically joining games with New Recruits. Systematically Farming "New Recruits" may also systematically creating unappealing games that more savvy users avoid because of unpopular or niche game settings, thus luring New Recruits into stumbling into said games. Either of these practices are done in order to "farm" newbies for points, and if you find yourself doing one or both of these practices, you will find yourself escalating on the New Recruit Farming Vacation scale.

Systematically Farming New Recruits Infraction levels are as follows:
Warning
1 Month Vacation / Block from joining games with New Recruits and from Creating games which New Recruits can join.
3 Month Vacation / Block from joining games with New Recruits and from Creating games which New Recruits can join.
Permanent Vacation / Block from joining games with New Recruits and from Creating games which New Recruits can join.


I am not gaining rank or points with the few games I join. Nothing is being farmed.

I can't believe this is even being discussed. Conquer Club can be a real joke sometimes. Genuinely sad.

Why don't we just leave it alone till there's a verdict, aye?

Game 13776694

OMG OMG OMG... me and [player]Wes24601[/player] must be farming!

JoshyBoy wrote:Game 13776694

OMG OMG OMG... me and [player]Wes24601[/player] must be farming!

off with your head!

hasnt JR farmed in the past or am i thinking of someone else?

This is sad, but since the precedent is bollocks it doesn't really matter.

I'm locking this thread.

Sarcastic comments are not appreciated, especially when they add nothing to the case.

This is cleared for me. Although JOHNNYROCKET24 is, shall we say, one of those players who seem to can't stay away from new recruits for a few victories here and there, I think he knows well enough just when not to overdo this.