Conquer Club

patrickaa317 wrote:

DiM wrote:

patrickaa317 wrote:Not invisible ink...

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=171702#p3753849

at first the message did not contain the second account. that was the message greenoaks quoted.
then sniffie came back and edited that post and added the second account.
since sniffie is a mod he can edit his posts without leaving a visible trace.

I didn't know they had that power. But in reality, greenoaks made the comment about invisible ink after the post had already been modified and the second account was already posted since #1 Stunna had already quoted it, correct?

he said he can't read invisible ink and quoted the post as it originally was.
he probably wanted to emphasise the fact that sniffie did not provide all the info at first. i don't know.

Mountain, molehill. Congrats on the bust.

DiM wrote:

patrickaa317 wrote:

DiM wrote:

patrickaa317 wrote:Not invisible ink...

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=171702#p3753849

at first the message did not contain the second account. that was the message greenoaks quoted.
then sniffie came back and edited that post and added the second account.
since sniffie is a mod he can edit his posts without leaving a visible trace.

I didn't know they had that power. But in reality, greenoaks made the comment about invisible ink after the post had already been modified and the second account was already posted since #1 Stunna had already quoted it, correct?

he said he can't read invisible ink and quoted the post as it originally was.
he probably wanted to emphasise the fact that sniffie did not provide all the info at first. i don't know.

you are correct DiM. i could not read what was not there so was entitled to ask.

i also requoted what i had seen to show that #1_stunna was one the one who had not read the thread.

patrickaa317 wrote:I didn't know they had that power. But in reality, greenoaks made the comment about invisible ink after the post had already been modified and the second account was already posted since #1 Stunna had already quoted it, correct?

incorrect, jgordon1111 was the player who'd quoted the bust post which clearly showed no name was mentioned.

for everyone else out there that has problems reading or comprehending, jgordon1111's post is directly above mine.

greenoaks wrote:incorrect, jgordon1111 was the player who'd quoted the bust post which clearly showed no name was mentioned.

for everyone else out there that has problems reading or comprehending, jgordon1111's post is directly above mine.

lol, not sure if you meant to sound like a dick there or not. If you meant to, you definitely succeeded. And you did make the invisible ink comment after the post was modified as you quoted the modified post in your invisible ink comment. If it sounded like I was trying to make a point by originally asking that, then my question was misinterpreted.

patrickaa317 wrote:

greenoaks wrote:incorrect, jgordon1111 was the player who'd quoted the bust post which clearly showed no name was mentioned.

for everyone else out there that has problems reading or comprehending, jgordon1111's post is directly above mine.

lol, not sure if you meant to sound like a dick there or not. If you meant to, you definitely succeeded. And you did make the invisible ink comment after the post was modified as you quoted the modified post in your invisible ink comment. If it sounded like I was trying to make a point by originally asking that, then my question was misinterpreted.

i'm sorry comprehension is not one of your strong points. don't worry, i'll walk you through it.

1. by jgordon1111 on Wed May 30, 2012 8:59 am
asks if the multi was created before or after this thread as NO other name was provided by sniffie. he quotes the post as evidence.

2. 8 minutes later i ask for the name of the other account

3. by #1_stunna on Thu May 31, 2012 2:35 am
is a complete tool and quotes the now modified post by sniffie and tells me to read

4. i respond by showing the info was not there when i asked my question and point out that if it was there i can't read invisible ink

5. you join the party late, not having read or comprehended the earlier posts

6. DiM correctly explained what had occurred

7. fast forward to now, you correctly deduce i was being a dick


please note the timestamps posted are in my time, yours will show times that correspond with your timezone but the elapsed time between posts remain the same.

OK kiddies lets put an end to this. I am going to lock this to keep it from getting out of hand.