Page 2 of 4

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:42 am
by tsioumiou
Knight2254 wrote:Why don't we all just 'foe' them and then move on? The scoreboard is a joke so I'm not worried about that - but if they want to turn new players off from this site then that is there prerogative - however, you would think the admins would frown upon that.


Much better work here than the one i opened in General Discussion.

The problem is not us. The problem is the new players that are getting toasted

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:57 am
by Jamie
The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:13 am
by jghost7
tsioumiou wrote:The problem is not us. The problem is the new players that are getting toasted


There will always be a new player being toasted, especially in Freestyle, but the point is that they are not being targeted.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:31 am
by codeblue1018
:lol:

Very well documented Chuuuuck. An inflated rank for really a bunch of mediocre players is what it boils down to. It is quite apparent that attaining a rank that they would never attain playing like most legit players do is their goal. This is obvious as that continued doing this despite the original thread in GD. It is clear that they have no regard for the integrity of this site as they blatantly use these bullshit tactics. They my as well have the rank of cook as the star is meaningless. Zero respect for all involved as most would agree with.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:24 am
by Chuuuuck
[bigimg]http://i1013.photobucket.com/albums/af260/brig5903/Simmons3.jpg[/bigimg]

Anyone else notice that they dropped the game that was quoted and snapshotted in the OP. Pretty funny.

It was ready to be played, they had all of their low rankers joined and ripe for the kill, and instead of accepting the last invite AFTER 11 DAYS of waiting, they dropped the game completely.

Why the sudden conscious? Don't think this thread could have anything to do with it, do you?

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:25 am
by betiko
Chuuuuck wrote:[bigimg]http://i1013.photobucket.com/albums/af260/brig5903/Simmons3.jpg[/bigimg]

Anyone else notice that they dropped the game that was quoted and snapshotted in the OP. Pretty funny.

It was ready to be played, they had all of their low rankers joined and ripe for the kill, and instead of accepting the last invite AFTER 11 DAYS of waiting, they dropped the game completely.

Why the sudden conscious? Don't think this thread could have anything to do with it, do you?



to be perfectly honest, probably because you do somehow have a point chuuck. I played like 5 or 6 games of those, I know they were not fair for team 2. I've been in many cc game ambushes, and I just wanted to advance my medal i played a few of those out of many other game modes.
I think we all know it's not completely fair, and that it's a technique commonly used. Maybe a few pack guys played a bit too much of these in the past days.
But don't worry, they are all more than legit top tier brigs (even if codeblue might not agree, but I think that our clan wars result prove we are not that mediocre). maybe they did get a bit gready to reach their first star.
I just think we all got the point and won't do it again that's why all games have been dropped.
Apologies to the CC comunity that might have been bothered by this, won't happen again, but I do think this incident showed that a change must be made in team freestyle games and the way they are initialized because starting first is a great advantage.
And I one of the guys that really thinks freestyle should be treated as a different game with a different scoreboard.

cheers.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:28 am
by Chuuuuck
betiko wrote:to be perfectly honest, probably because you do somehow have a point chuuck. I played like 5 or 6 games of those, I know they were not fair for team 2. I've been in many cc game ambushes, and I just wanted to advance my medal i played a few of those out of many other game modes.
I think we all know it's not completely fair, and that it's a technique commonly used. Maybe a few pack guys played a bit too much of these in the past days.
But don't worry, they are all more than legit top tier brigs (even if codeblue might not agree, but I think that our clan wars result prove we are not that mediocre). maybe they did get a bit gready to reach their first star.
I just think we all got the point and won't do it again that's why all games have been dropped.
Apologies to the CC comunity that might have been bothered by this, won't happen again, but I do think this incident showed that a change must be made in team freestyle games and the way they are initialized because starting first is a great advantage.
And I one of the guys that really thinks freestyle should be treated as a different game with a different scoreboard.

cheers.


A lot of the time I think posts from your clan are very immature and on the defensive without having a real look at the situation. Every once in a while you all surprise me.

This is one of the better and most realistic posts I have read. I appreciate the efforts made. And I do appreciate the acknowledgement that it is wrong and makes the site worse in general. Thanks betiko.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:54 am
by Great-Ollie
Let's all get one thing straight here, this is a clear cut case of using the current system in place. A lot of people consider it abuse, which to a small degree i can see why, BUT with the current rules there is no premise on this being a major infraction case. If i was KA i would send out a warning to my clan mates to not abuse the current invite system anymore and let them make the right choice, but until they recieve some sort of warning, then why would they stop? I personally do not agree with inviting low ranks to FS games to ranch them. I do agree with Chuuuuuuck on a lot here, but until they face discipline, why jump all over them, they are all great players and guys. I think there needs to be a rule change here so this kind of thing gets abolished and we don't run into these problems.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:12 pm
by Chariot of Fire
Great last post by betiko. Kudos mate. =D>

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:31 pm
by Leehar
I didn't know the person joining last could play first? Maybe just fixing that loophole could work?

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:41 pm
by IcePack
Could still coordinate with their team, but how about team that joins last can't go first?

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:48 pm
by hmsps
Chariot of Fire wrote:Great last post by betiko. Kudos mate. =D>
+1 nice to see some honesty here.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:03 pm
by skillfull
Players who do that kind of tricks in order to get medals or for getting more and more points show a low character to me and I think to the whole CC community ( except in those who does the same, i guess).

Do you want to be respected by the best players on the site? Then you only have to face them on the battlefield and win them ,and not by getting a star by playing those kind of games.Simple as that.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:40 pm
by codeblue1018
betiko wrote:
Chuuuuck wrote:[bigimg]http://i1013.photobucket.com/albums/af260/brig5903/Simmons3.jpg[/bigimg]

Anyone else notice that they dropped the game that was quoted and snapshotted in the OP. Pretty funny.

It was ready to be played, they had all of their low rankers joined and ripe for the kill, and instead of accepting the last invite AFTER 11 DAYS of waiting, they dropped the game completely.

Why the sudden conscious? Don't think this thread could have anything to do with it, do you?



to be perfectly honest, probably because you do somehow have a point chuuck. I played like 5 or 6 games of those, I know they were not fair for team 2. I've been in many cc game ambushes, and I just wanted to advance my medal i played a few of those out of many other game modes.
I think we all know it's not completely fair, and that it's a technique commonly used. Maybe a few pack guys played a bit too much of these in the past days.
But don't worry, they are all more than legit top tier brigs (even if codeblue might not agree, but I think that our clan wars result prove we are not that mediocre). maybe they did get a bit gready to reach their first star.
I just think we all got the point and won't do it again that's why all games have been dropped.
Apologies to the CC comunity that might have been bothered by this, won't happen again, but I do think this incident showed that a change must be made in team freestyle games and the way they are initialized because starting first is a great advantage.
And I one of the guys that really thinks freestyle should be treated as a different game with a different scoreboard.

cheers.


Stand up post!

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:09 pm
by DrewbieDoo
Not gonna lie. It's pure strategy at the heart of this matter. The court should be guided by the history and public policy of the invitation method. I liken this situation to a childish game of musical chairs. Where the ultimate goal is to be at minimum second-to-last. Timing is of the essence in such sport. A competitor's use of his innate skill to eliminate worthier competitors early on where the shuffle for a remaining seat is chaotic, proves to be the fruit of his labor later in the game when only a few chairs remain and only unworthy opponents left.

I respectfully request that this court heed this rule and decide in favor of the accused.

For Frodo.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:17 pm
by Evolution299
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:51 pm
by TheGeneral2112
If this is found guilty then they will join all games together as team 2 and take the first turn just the same.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:09 pm
by codeblue1018
Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.


The concept of freestyle isn't the problem and is a vital component of this site. The problem is with players manipulating the game style. A little tweaking and a couple new rules and wahlah, problem solved.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:26 pm
by tsioumiou
Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.



Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:50 pm
by Chariot of Fire
tsioumiou wrote:
Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.



Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think


I think you help destroy your case by making glib remarks, that's what I think.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:45 pm
by tsioumiou
Chariot of Fire wrote:
tsioumiou wrote:
Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.



Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think


I think you help destroy your case by making glib remarks, that's what I think.


And you are just trolling. Do you have anything to say? Dont you think the comment that he made deserves this kind of answer?

I ve said it before. Competitive speed freestyle(not farming) is one of the best things this site has to offer. The invite button abuse requires freestyle but blaming the freestyle is just silly. It is way too general. we are talking about 0.0001% of freestyle games. I find it really hard to understand how some people can be so naive to blame freestyle.

There you go

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:00 pm
by army of nobunaga
I was in tecs clan.. he is by far the biggest cheater Ive met.. Im not going to add examples... Ill not sully my name more.

But Yeah... I know his underlings well... I know what they say and told me in the past.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:35 pm
by jltile1
Why not just make freestyle rank separate ? It is a totally diffrent game than any other two rank would be nice and seems all the complaints could vanish. Just a thought maybe we wouldn't see all these complaints.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:51 pm
by tec805
army of nobunaga wrote:I was in tecs clan.. he is by far the biggest cheater Ive met.. Im not going to add examples... Ill not sully my name more.

But Yeah... I know his underlings well... I know what they say and told me in the past.


2011-04-20 16:31:58 - tec805 [team]: Army, you could have hit L3 like I suggested and dropped pink to 11. You left a 5 stack next to Paulus, cyan has an 11 stack he could bring north and fort to Paulus
2011-04-20 16:40:08 - tec805 [team]: you have multiple possible forts and you skipped doing any. We really need to work on every small advantage we can get if we want to win by more that lucky dice
2011-04-29 16:48:42 - tec805 [team]: unless army fucks this up
2011-05-01 05:22:13 - tec805 [team]: dude, when you are fucking up just be a big boy and admit it, then try and play nice with others


That was from our last game together AoN. I take my Stalingrad war games very seriously and you were almost worthless as a partner. You stomped your feet, quit the clan and CC. Your personal vendetta over our long ago issues might have tainted your oh-so-eloquent prose. We were playing cheaply, but at least we played well.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:45 pm
by Chariot of Fire
tsioumiou wrote:
Chariot of Fire wrote:
tsioumiou wrote:
Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.



Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think


I think you help destroy your case by making glib remarks, that's what I think.


And you are just trolling. Do you have anything to say? Dont you think the comment that he made deserves this kind of answer?

I ve said it before. Competitive speed freestyle(not farming) is one of the best things this site has to offer. The invite button abuse requires freestyle but blaming the freestyle is just silly. It is way too general. we are talking about 0.0001% of freestyle games. I find it really hard to understand how some people can be so naive to blame freestyle.

There you go


And there you go mate - that wasn't so hard was it? This C&A report was brought about as a result of your initial post (in GD) in which you appeared to have given up the cause

Well i don't want to drag this any further. I did expect a bit more support maybe.


My fellow clan mates and I also don't condone or practice cheap tactics, so it was felt a C&A report was merited based on the evidence you had already unearthed. No-one is going to pay any attention to Jamie's post when he says "Get rid of freestyle altogether" for that's not ever going to happen. Your reply......

Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think


.....doesn't exactly help the cause, rather it perpetuates the deviation from topic which could result in the thread being locked.

So no, I wasn't trolling. Just staying focused. Cheers