...uh WINNING!!!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: ...uh WINNING!!!

Post by thegreekdog »

jay_a2j wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Who says those Democrats weren't doing the job they were elected to do? Perhaps the majority of their constituents, that elected them, do not support what the Republicans were attempting to do. If this is the case in each of their ridings, then I think they were representing their constituents.


There already exists a method for demonstrating that your constituents do not support a bill. It's called voting against the bill.



Yup, running away and hiding is not what they were elected to do. Please tell me they weren't being paid when they failed to show up for work. Is there any of us here who could do the same and still have a job to go back to?????


Wisconsin teachers?

Sorry, was that too soon?
Image
User avatar
targetman377
Posts: 2223
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ...uh WINNING!!!

Post by targetman377 »

Metsfanmax wrote:This is a sad day for democracy.

to bad we don't have a democracy :D WE HAVE A REPUBLIC!!!! ITS DIFFERENT!
VOTE AUTO/TARGET in 12
User avatar
targetman377
Posts: 2223
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ...uh WINNING!!!

Post by targetman377 »

notyou2 wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Who says those Democrats weren't doing the job they were elected to do? Perhaps the majority of their constituents, that elected them, do not support what the Republicans were attempting to do. If this is the case in each of their ridings, then I think they were representing their constituents.


There already exists a method for demonstrating that your constituents do not support a bill. It's called voting against the bill.


They did vote. They voted with their feet.

Is that conventional politics? NO.

However, the Republicans are not playing conventional politics either. This indeed is a sad day for democracies everywhere.

AGAIN WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY YOU SHOULD READ UP ON WHAT A DEMOCRACY IS ACTUALLY WE ARE A REPUBLIC YOUR POINT IS NULL AND VOID!!!
VOTE AUTO/TARGET in 12
User avatar
GreecePwns
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lawn Guy Lint

Re: ...uh WINNING!!!

Post by GreecePwns »

thegreekdog wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:This is a sad day for democracy.


I've heard this elsewhere and it's very much incorrect. The people of Wisconsin elected a legislature and a governor. ELECTED! DEMOCRATICALLY! And these individuals passed this law. This is a great day for democracy. It may be a sad day for the state employees unions in Wisconsin, however. Perhaps that's what you meant to say.

To paraphrase President Obama, "Tough shit, we won."
This is true. And I have the feeling this issue will resonate during the elections in Wisconsin the same way health care resonated last year.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.

Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: ...uh WINNING!!!

Post by Phatscotty »

Doc_Brown wrote:Just to point out, the "political tactics" that the Republicans used to get this through were the equivalent of the Democrats using reconciliation to pass the Health Care Act. (And before you start arguing that this isn't true and I'm just distorting things because of a conservative bias, it was the self-acknowledged liberal, Nate Silver, that first noted this fact over on FiveThirtyEight.)

There was actually a story on NPR a couple weeks ago about the reason the Repubs up there are pushing the collective bargaining limitations so strongly. Apparently there's a prison in Wisconsin that costs about $350K per year to run. It houses exactly 1 inmate and employs six prison guards. A nearby county (possibly in Michigan?) has offered to house the prisoner, which would save the state $300K per year, but due to union agreements, union members cannot be laid off if their jobs are contracted out to other jurisdictions. It's issues like that that cause major headaches when they try to trim out wasteful spending and inefficient use of resources. Government moves slowly as it is. Unions also cause delays and hangups in organizational changes. When you combine the two, it's difficult to get much of anything done.


Sure do miss ya
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: ...uh WINNING!!!

Post by thegreekdog »

GreecePwns wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:This is a sad day for democracy.


I've heard this elsewhere and it's very much incorrect. The people of Wisconsin elected a legislature and a governor. ELECTED! DEMOCRATICALLY! And these individuals passed this law. This is a great day for democracy. It may be a sad day for the state employees unions in Wisconsin, however. Perhaps that's what you meant to say.

To paraphrase President Obama, "Tough shit, we won."
This is true. And I have the feeling this issue will resonate during the elections in Wisconsin the same way health care resonated last year.


It depends on how the Wisconsin economy is doing before the next election. I don't think there are as many angry Wisconsinites as there are angry national union members.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”