Page 2 of 2

Re: Ironwood abuse [pending]KS

Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:47 pm
by ronsizzle
Chariot of Fire wrote:
in a case like this COF, do you really think it is needed to check? this guy is just mad that someone might have got the better of him...


No it's probably not needed Ron if I'm honest. This thread however did catch my eye because in over two years on the site the most offensive, unnecessary and foul-mouthed PM came from Iron Wood. I was kinda hoping somebody had the goods on him :D



i understand now. haha. but they dont have the goods...i dont even know ironwood.

Re: Ironwood abuse [pending]KS

Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:48 pm
by king sam
Nanogram wrote:
"have a look at peoples pm's"? are you fucking serious?


Yes, how else do they discover hidden diplomacy? Your PMs are not private.


we do not / can not go through your inboxes.. we don't do this for diplomacy case nor anything else.

I'm sorry but if there was bigoted info posted on your wall it is not there now, therefor I cant hold anyone accountable for it. Next time at the least take a screenshot to show as proof towards your case.

Seeing as from what I understand you sent out passwords to numerous people above a certain score mark any one of these people could have likely handed out the passwords. Obviously we all think it was ironwood, but I don't have solid proof on this matter just like the rest. So the conclusion of all this is to next time use the invite function to protect the integrity of the game intentions for which you have set up, and to foe and move on from ironwood. And if this situation ever presents itself again, keep some kind of proof.

Closed.

KS

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:12 pm
by slowreactor
:shock:

FAMO caught on :shock:

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:54 pm
by Snowgun
slowreactor wrote::shock:

FAMO caught on :shock:


Yea baby! 8-)

famo 4 lif3! :lol:

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:00 am
by Army of GOD
Snowgun wrote:
slowreactor wrote::shock:

FAMO caught on :shock:


Yea baby! 8-)

famo 4 lif3! :lol:


FAMO is GOD!

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:01 am
by ronsizzle
Army of GOD wrote:
Snowgun wrote:
slowreactor wrote::shock:

FAMO caught on :shock:


Yea baby! 8-)

famo 4 lif3! :lol:


FAMO is GOD!


i am God.

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:04 am
by Gold Knight
ronc8649 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
Snowgun wrote:
slowreactor wrote::shock:

FAMO caught on :shock:


Yea baby! 8-)

famo 4 lif3! :lol:


FAMO is GOD!


i am God.


So Ronc8649=FAMO???

And on topic, there are a ton of people like this on CC, ignore them...

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:07 am
by Snowgun
Gold Knight wrote:And on topic, there are a ton of people like this on CC, ignore them...


Alls you gotz to do is FAMO baby, Yeaaaaaa.... 8-)

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:13 am
by king sam
FAMO was invented at McGill University in 1921, of course it was going to catch on in CC sooner or later.

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:17 am
by jefjef
king sam wrote:FAMO was invented at McGill University in 1921, of course it was going to catch on in CC sooner or later.


Keep spam to a minimum and stay on topic please.

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:22 am
by Snowgun
jefjef wrote:
king sam wrote:FAMO was invented at McGill University in 1921, of course it was going to catch on in CC sooner or later.


Keep spam to a minimum and stay on topic please.


Dick-ish but also funny. :) classic jefjef

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:52 am
by king sam
:lol: jefjef..

Case is Closed.

Re: Ironwood abuse

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:34 pm
by Nanogram
I'm sorry but if there was bigoted info posted on your wall it is not there now, therefor I cant hold anyone accountable for it. Next time at the least take a screenshot to show as proof towards your case.

Seeing as from what I understand you sent out passwords to numerous people above a certain score mark any one of these people could have likely handed out the passwords. Obviously we all think it was ironwood, but I don't have solid proof on this matter just like the rest. So the conclusion of all this is to next time use the invite function to protect the integrity of the game intentions for which you have set up, and to foe and move on from ironwood. And if this situation ever presents itself again, keep some kind of proof.


Fair enough. Next time, I'll take a screen shot.

One question though, is it or is it not okay to give private passwords to two-player games to people who were not invited to play? A close reading of the definition of "trolling" seems to confirm that it is against the rules.

Also, most of the people who have come to the defense of Ironwood are people who he has teamed with. And people who he has teamed with are the only ones who got a hold of the password. I asked each of these players who had given them the password and they had all "forgotten". Ironwood even made a joke in one of the games by posting "what's the password". Circumstantial evidence makes it 100% clear to me who broadcast the private password. But I don't know if that is actually against the rules so I would like a ruling from the mods if possible.

And for the record, I do not EVER suicide in one game to get revenge for something in another game. I have almost 30 games going and I didn't even realize that Ironwood was in both games. This whole problem was invented by Ironwood. He took offense where none was offered, and then did his best to offend and retaliate.

I understand his teammates coming to his defense. He is the ranking player among them and they feel the need to defend their leader. But the bottom line is, as I said above, I never did anything offensive to Ironwood. I didn't even return his insults -even though I was sorely tempted. You guys might want to reexamine the reasons you feel compelled to defend him.

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:58 pm
by king sam
I will double check for you on the status of if or if it isn't against the rules to pass out private passwords to others just for clarification.

But in this case you handed out the passwords to more then one person, so we cant very well prove that Ironwood was the one that leaked the info.

I will let you know the clarification as soon as I get it.

KS

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:01 pm
by IronWood
Accused:
Ironwood

The accused is suspected of:
Being Multis
Severe PM Abuse
Other: See below

[player]nanogram[/player]wrote "But the bottom line is, as I said above, I never did anything offensive to Ironwood." (What is crying and trying to get me suspended for no reason?)

Why don't you grow a set. Because I beat you down and humiliated you, you accuse me of being a Multi? This moral superiority complex you have is moronic. Grow up and man up!

Re: Ironwood abuse [FAMO] KS

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:06 pm
by IronWood
...and one more thing... once our singles game was decided, in my favor, look at his attacking.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=6383409

He's a marginal player at best and a big crybaby.

Re: Ironwood abuse

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:13 pm
by Nanogram
moral superiority


That sums up our relative positions perfectly. You have abused the system and your only concern is that you get away with it. You don't deny having done it because you are proud to have gotten away with it. Rather than apologizing, you heap meaningless insults onto your list of abuses. You apparently have no remorse whatsoever. I would be ashamed of having done what you did.

It does not take a very high level of moral integrity to gain moral superiority over people like you.