Conquer Club

macbone wrote:I did. Did you check out his profile? [player]Gen.LeeGettinhed[/player]

Yeah, some of the ratings are negative, but here are his most recent tags:

5/5/5 - Friendly, Helpful, Talkative, Good Strategy
3/2/3
5/5/5 - Quick, Friendly
5/5/5 - Quick, Helpful, Good Strategy
5/5/5 - Friendly, Good Strategy
5/5/5 - Quick, Leader
5/5/5 - Quick, Friendly, Talkative
5/5/5
5/5/5 - Good Strategy
5/5/5 - Helpful, Talkative, Good Teammate, Good Strategy

He gets a ton of Helpful and Friendly tags.

Not everyone is happy with him; further down the list he gets more negative tags, but he seems to be doing some good.

There are several threads with double-digit amounts of pages in C&A about him, mainly filled with bashing.

lol, this thread shows just how many nut cases there are in CC and a lack of understanding what's proper:
1) I don't play Cooks (ok, 1 was in a DOUBLES) or New Recruits -- although it's perfectly legal to, so the whole thread is total BS
2) JR offerring to play in their place sure sounds illegal: Multi, improper account sitting for the wrong reason

Why doesn't CC admin act on #2? we'll see.. .

DH

I just looked at your "games" ... you are a joke. Grow a pair.

If any cooks do join his games and have to go away on vacation.I'm sure most of the top ranked players in this thread would be more then happy to cover for you.

This pretty much shows how the spirit of CC is tainted at the top... What a joke.. these clowns ruin the point system for the rest of us. I mean really, I see people like this 2000+ above me.. and they are suppose to be better players? Makes me wish there was no point system when I see this crap.

I hope he gets his ass handed to him in real life by everyone, including the grocery bagging kid when he checks out of the grocery store.

cmon change the rules: this he sais in a game "2010-07-02 05:22:55 - Gen.LeeGettinhed: you may have saved me 100 pts.. .I'll be more careful to make sure opponents haven't played map"

he checkes if they have played the map yet or not, this is clearly farming, what is farming else..., why can you guys just punish him for unwritten rules , if he plays like that I think he can expect punishment...

thebest712 wrote:he checkes if they have played the map yet or not, this is clearly farming

Nope, that's just good capitalism.

Wall Street rule number one: You don't enter a market that you won't profit in.


If he's willing to get up early in the morning, work hard, do his research, then thoroughly whoop your naughty little buttocks in every game that you play, then he deserves to earn the big-bucks.

Hating on him and moaning about how much of a low-earning loser you are is just sour-grapes/socialism. You shouldn't have been so lazy in the first place.



If you work hard, success will follow.

Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:lol, this thread shows just how many nut cases there are in CC and a lack of understanding what's proper:
1) I don't play Cooks (ok, 1 was in a DOUBLES) or New Recruits -- although it's perfectly legal to, so the whole thread is total BS
2) JR offerring to play in their place sure sounds illegal: Multi, improper account sitting for the wrong reason

Why doesn't CC admin act on #2? we'll see.. .

DH

He's offering to play instead not account sit or create multis. try reading before speaking.

wrong forum.... cheating and abuse? lol who knows where this should go ha...

there are already enough treats about him there I think

Remember, farming is limited to New Recruits.

this wasnt in C&A till very recently. JR was just looking for games to play

Um this is spurious...how is it C&A...

THORNHEART wrote:Um this is spurious...how is it C&A...

it was moved here from where it was. im pretty sure it was in off-topics or GD

lol, not cheating -- just refining technique.

Also, when I invite someone, and they get a PM (in inbox) -- and JR wants to take it and play. . .it sure sounds like he's "100% account sitting" -- and not the person invited.

I've met quite a few decent people and made several friends here, but are there REALLY this many losers and haters on this site? Please tell me the name of the fast food franchises you work at so I can avoid those locations. The Doctor makes the most sense here. . .

DH

Darwins_Bane wrote:

THORNHEART wrote:Um this is spurious...how is it C&A...

it was moved here from where it was. im pretty sure it was in off-topics or GD

It was in strategy

Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Also, when I invite someone, and they get a PM (in inbox) -- and JR wants to take it and play. . .it sure sounds like he's "100% account sitting" -- and not the person invited.

Its not account sitting if what he does is have them instead give him the info and he joins. It would be abuse of the system. Oh, wait, no its not, just like what you do isn't.

King Doctor wrote:that's just good capitalism.

I am truly amazed at how:
1) people find my 1v1 games despicable, but any other group of high ranks teaming together to play a bunch of much lower ranks is totally OK.
2) people (jakewilliams?) despises my play -- but they play cooks (I don't) and other lower ranks (to different degrees)
3) Moderators -- who should be impartial. . .spew mudslinging with impunity

. . .and all I do is manage risk -- legally. The best epee swordsman doesn't brawl with Kung-Fu masters for a reason, and aren't expected to. Thanks for all the laughs -- and support from friends and impartials with more than a junior high education.

DH

Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:I am truly amazed at how:
1) people find my 1v1 games despicable, but any other group of high ranks teaming together to play a bunch of much lower ranks is totally OK.
2) people (jakewilliams?) despises my play -- but they play cooks (I don't) and other lower ranks (to different degrees)
3) Moderators -- who should be impartial. . .spew mudslinging with impunity

. . .and all I do is manage risk -- legally. The best epee swordsman doesn't brawl with Kung-Fu masters for a reason, and aren't expected to. Thanks for all the laughs -- and support from friends and impartials with more than a junior high education.

DH

The points you are bring up are valid, I especially endorse the third point you mentioned. Personally, I just try to avoid the notorious and ludicrously restricting "honour codes" that people have created surrounding this online RISK game imitation, which try to dictate how each and every CCer should play the game they have, in the majority of cases, paid for. You pay to play; I don't see the problem as long as you're playing within the rules.

Enjoy.

well since this is not belonging anywhere apparently... others feel they have made themselves moderators.... and decide this doesnt go here either.. I am going to wave my handcuffs and locker down! No mudslinging.. just handcuffing

This was a thread that was made for open discussion or a public announcement on DH and his other then honorable tactics. It got moved over here to C&A because Im guessing someone thought it was a claim. it was an honest mistake this isnt a spurious report.

however i do think its best to keep this locked and im moving it to the closed section if this forum where u can see about 10 other threads on DH for his "strategy".

KS