Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:06 pm
lol, u put up quite a fight. besides, when it comes to 1vs1, its all luck. so plz, dont challenge me, i need a break after those 2 challenges plus an upcoming one of my own. 
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/
Bring It On!!! [Winners: HighlanderAttack & Lufsen75]
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=44612
Page 10 of 178
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:14 pm
nah, iam not gonna challenge you again.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:15 am
i challenge for british isles
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:34 am
I that just thought I had sent out all Pm and then this challenge are up to. 
I make this game later lord.
I make this game later lord.Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:51 am
Lufsen75 wrote:I that just thought I had sent out all Pm and then this challenge are up to.
sorry bud..i forgot to check thread for round 5...didnt wanna miss.
plus i own zony 1v1
j/k
its fine though take your time
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:55 am
lord voldemort wrote:Lufsen75 wrote:I that just thought I had sent out all Pm and then this challenge are up to.
sorry bud..i forgot to check thread for round 5...didnt wanna miss.
plus i own zony 1v1
its fine though take your time
Now all current cahllenges have their games and Pm sent.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:43 am
1995274, 1995272
zobots successfully defends AoR: Might.....
I challenge for AoR: Magic
zobots successfully defends AoR: Might.....
I challenge for AoR: Magic
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:43 pm
banana_hammocks wrote:I would like to challenge tokstolle for WWII Western Front
Good luck (you will need that).
Sorry for a late chalange, but I challange banana_hammocks for WWII Iwo Jima.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:58 pm
tokstolle wrote:banana_hammocks wrote:I would like to challenge tokstolle for WWII Western Front
Good luck (you will need that).
Sorry for a late chalange, but I challange banana_hammocks for WWII Iwo Jima.
No challenge are late until the round are gone.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:29 pm
Lufsen75 wrote:tokstolle wrote:banana_hammocks wrote:I would like to challenge tokstolle for WWII Western Front
Good luck (you will need that).
Sorry for a late chalange, but I challange banana_hammocks for WWII Iwo Jima.
No challenge are late until the round are gone.
Only for you to set up the challange then.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:12 pm
New maps are added on the list. But the will not be able to claim. I have set up one game on each map with 8 people to join (7 cause I have joined all). password for them all are "newmap". Here are the maps and gamenumber:
Netherland - 1997945
Prohibition Chicago - 1997964
Sovjet Union - 1997971
Netherland - 1997945
Prohibition Chicago - 1997964
Sovjet Union - 1997971
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:28 pm
Soviet Union/Netherlands have only 6 slots left, I think I'll bow out of prohibition Chicago, it looks quite intimidating
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:38 pm
did u have to make prohibition adn soviet union adjacent? argh 
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:50 am
jako wrote:did u have to make prohibition adn soviet union adjacent? argh :evil: :(
I'll have to agree with ya there. Not a fan.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:22 am
i defend duck and cover...
and me and zony are locked at 1 a peice (most likely)
and me and zony are locked at 1 a peice (most likely)
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:37 am
=updated maps/titles chart with the new maps=
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:58 pm
jako wrote:did u have to make prohibition adn soviet union adjacent? argh
I made that cause it is the origin rules of RISK. Sequential, Flat rate and Adjacent fort. Just that. Nothing else. If you win it you make the settings. I myself are no fan och SFAS either. I like SNCS.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:00 pm
I defended Age of Magic.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:52 pm
Original American rules use escalating.Lufsen75 wrote:I made that cause it is the origin rules of RISK. Sequential, Flat rate and Adjacent fort. Just that. Nothing else. If you win it you make the settings. I myself are no fan och SFAS either. I like SNCS.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:58 pm
BaldAdonis wrote:Original American rules use escalating.Lufsen75 wrote:I made that cause it is the origin rules of RISK. Sequential, Flat rate and Adjacent fort. Just that. Nothing else. If you win it you make the settings. I myself are no fan och SFAS either. I like SNCS.
Original Swedish rules then. But anyway. This is standed in the first post.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:45 pm
Lufsen75 wrote:BaldAdonis wrote:Original American rules use escalating.Lufsen75 wrote:I made that cause it is the origin rules of RISK. Sequential, Flat rate and Adjacent fort. Just that. Nothing else. If you win it you make the settings. I myself are no fan och SFAS either. I like SNCS.
Original Swedish rules then. But anyway. This is standed in the first post.
This is true, we kept a lot of what Coleman had originally because it worked so well. No complaints, just fun. May the best "Champ" win.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:02 pm
i thought american rules used esc/chained?
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:30 pm
Nah, Esc/Adj. I know many people who PLAYED chained, but that wasn't the rules.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:40 pm
Kinnison wrote:Nah, Esc/Adj. I know many people who PLAYED chained, but that wasn't the rules.
What he said.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:41 pm
i wish to challange for american civil war
that is all
that is all