Conquer Club

Charle was at L-2 so he needs to claim. The town sheriff has a GUILTY report from night investigation on him.

as Charle himself said, it doesn't seem likely sonic would make a false claim at this point. Devante's unvote brought it down to 4. i'll hold off on bringing it back to 5 for now in case Charle is going to make some sort of claim (a better one than his first attempt to explain it) but that guilty verdict should say it all..

however, if votes come in fast and the day ends before i check in again, want to protect myself

no lynch so as not to have that extra vote for not casting a vote

poker table: EW (doth protest too much), devante, ragian, max, jfm

I am a Town Bomb. Probably better for town if I get lynched now, as I could have killed townies if they visited me at night for any reason and I am killed by scum.

Charle wrote:I am a Town Bomb. Probably better for town if I get lynched now, as I could have killed townies if they visited me at night for any reason and I am killed by scum.

So howcome i did not blew up? I visited you last night to investigate..

If I get killed by a night kill, then everybody who visited me that night get killed.

Charle wrote:If I get killed by a night kill, then everybody who visited me that night get killed.

The "Vegas Town Bomber" does not sound very townish Charle, and im not buying it either.. But it's a good laugh

I do believe you could be a scum bomber.

Anyways; I wanna see your cards today.

Speaking of cards;

D1 named combo's at the table:
Max, Charle, Ragian, EW and Strike
Charles, Kingm, Devante, Ragian, EW
Traf, Sonic, Kong, Devante, Ragian
Son!c, Extreme Ways, TrafalgarLaw01, kongming3, Maxleod
Son!c, Maxleod, Extreme Ways, kongming3 and TrafalgarLaw01
JFM, King, Pixar, Charle, Devante
Tlaw, Devante, Maxleod, jfm10, strike wolf

I think the MOD will announce it if a dead player was at the table so we can exclude Kong?

D2 sofar
EW, devante, ragian, max, jfm


My D2 guess is
Charle, Kingm, Devante, Ragian, TLaw

Alright, cool burger. Charle has claimed town bomb. As far as I remember that kills the lynch vote too, so it reeks of an attempt to get people off voting.

Anyway, Charle has claimed and we can look at other stuff before lynching Charle towards the end of D2. Many people haven't weighed I'm, yet.

@homer, what do you mean by protecting yourself?

@LC, maybe cheek on jfm. He's awol from clan games, so you might need a sub.

Ragian wrote:Alright, cool burger. Charle has claimed town bomb. As far as I remember that kills the lynch vote too, so it reeks of an attempt to get people off voting.

Anyway, Charle has claimed and we can look at other stuff before lynching Charle towards the end of D2. Many people haven't weighed I'm, yet.

@homer, what do you mean by protecting yourself?

@LC, maybe cheek on jfm. He's awol from clan games, so you might need a sub.

Ragian, it has nothing to do with killing people who vote for me, only if i was night killed, then the people who visited me on that night would be killed.

Could you link to your role online? I've only ever played with a bomb that killed the lynch (deciding) vote.

Ragian wrote:Could you link to your role online? I've only ever played with a bomb that killed the lynch (deciding) vote.

Especially the role how it is explained (where a Town bomber blows up fellow townsman too)

True claim Vegas odds:

The more important question is why would you ever claim to be town bomb? A real town bomb role exist, but he should never reveal himself as a town Bomb, because it is a player who suicide kills their scum killer when killed at Night.. and ofc scum will not visit you IF you are town and IF they think you are a real town bomb.

Also as a town bomb, you should want mafia to visit you by playing accordingly. Your play D1 does not match that of a true town bomb.

The more important question however, still remains: how a town bomber gets a GUILTY report..IF town and not 3P or scum, when a potential mafia busdriver most likely would have been used to mask the killing of Kong.

Vegas Odds say your claim is very unlikely Charle.

False claim vegas odds:

But false claiming Bomb is a convenient way to explain why a player is not being killed at Night. And matches great with my "GUILTY" report earlier where i said "i'll drop the BOMB" . So Charle went to wiki.mafiascum and typed in "bomb" to look for a false claim. Didn't you Charle?

Vegas Odds say your claim is very likely false. The odds are so non-existant that you can't even place a bet on it, because the probability of your outcome as scum/3P is that high.

Loose Canon wrote:Anyone not placing a vote (can still be be for no lynch) by end of Day2 will take a shot of Mezcal - with authentic Gusano (ONE EXTRA VOTE) at the beginning of Day3.
This will apply for players not placing votes end of Day 3 and onwards too.

Before I give me 2cents etc, I would like to be sure I understand something 100%.
Like this new rule seems to me to be so that people will be more active.
BUT the way I read it, is if you do not vote, you will get 2 votes the next day hehe, and that sounds OP, but maybe the one extra vote is on the "none voters"?

Kingm wrote:

Loose Canon wrote:Anyone not placing a vote (can still be be for no lynch) by end of Day2 will take a shot of Mezcal - with authentic Gusano (ONE EXTRA VOTE) at the beginning of Day3.
This will apply for players not placing votes end of Day 3 and onwards too.

Before I give me 2cents etc, I would like to be sure I understand something 100%.
Like this new rule seems to me to be so that people will be more active.
BUT the way I read it, is if you do not vote, you will get 2 votes the next day hehe, and that sounds OP, but maybe the one extra vote is on the "none voters"?

Yep extra vote next day if you did not vote on the previous day - or Loose drunk too much of his own Mezcal (with red worms) and he flipped it writing it down.. Because since town needs a majority vote count this only favors scum.. So that is why i think scum is already hanging in the ropes (Charle 100% guilty, heavy FoS on EW) and Loose wants to counter something to keep people in his Vegas resort.

Also: scum will wanna use the double vote next day so that is why i don't expect EW to vote today

SoN!c wrote:

Kingm wrote:

Loose Canon wrote:Anyone not placing a vote (can still be be for no lynch) by end of Day2 will take a shot of Mezcal - with authentic Gusano (ONE EXTRA VOTE) at the beginning of Day3.
This will apply for players not placing votes end of Day 3 and onwards too.

Before I give me 2cents etc, I would like to be sure I understand something 100%.
Like this new rule seems to me to be so that people will be more active.
BUT the way I read it, is if you do not vote, you will get 2 votes the next day hehe, and that sounds OP, but maybe the one extra vote is on the "none voters"?

Yep extra vote next day if you did not vote on the previous day - or Loose drunk too much of his own Mezcal (with red worms) and he flipped it writing it down.. Because since town needs a majority vote count this only favors scum.. So that is why i think scum is already hanging in the ropes (Charle 100% guilty, heavy FoS on EW) and Loose wants to counter something to keep people in his Vegas resort.

Also: scum will wanna use the double vote next day so that is why i don't expect EW to vote today

well, don't i feel dumb. i thought this was to make people be active and not voting meant you'd have a vote against you. but yeah, it doesn't say against at all. but that's what i meant about protecting myself

anyways... Vote Charle

homer_jay wrote:

SoN!c wrote:

Kingm wrote:

Loose Canon wrote:Anyone not placing a vote (can still be be for no lynch) by end of Day2 will take a shot of Mezcal - with authentic Gusano (ONE EXTRA VOTE) at the beginning of Day3.
This will apply for players not placing votes end of Day 3 and onwards too.

Before I give me 2cents etc, I would like to be sure I understand something 100%.
Like this new rule seems to me to be so that people will be more active.
BUT the way I read it, is if you do not vote, you will get 2 votes the next day hehe, and that sounds OP, but maybe the one extra vote is on the "none voters"?

Yep extra vote next day if you did not vote on the previous day - or Loose drunk too much of his own Mezcal (with red worms) and he flipped it writing it down.. Because since town needs a majority vote count this only favors scum.. So that is why i think scum is already hanging in the ropes (Charle 100% guilty, heavy FoS on EW) and Loose wants to counter something to keep people in his Vegas resort.

Also: scum will wanna use the double vote next day so that is why i don't expect EW to vote today

well, don't i feel dumb. i thought this was to make people be active and not voting meant you'd have a vote against you. but yeah, it doesn't say against at all. but that's what i meant about protecting myself

anyways... Vote Charle

It could be you have it right and it's one vote extra against those who did not vote. Anyway lots of confusion

Loose Canon wrote:extra auto vote is a be active incentive/be inactive disincentive and I don't see how it favours one faction over another but if I'm wrong on that i'm wrong.
I've pmd jfm but I don't like auto kills or subs per se.

So it's an extra vote against? Not having 2 votes the next day?

@sonic, what were the boxes that Charle ticked? I'm losing patience here.

@homer, why are you also ignoring my questions?

Ragian wrote:@sonic, what were the boxes that Charle ticked? I'm losing patience here.

@homer, why are you also ignoring my questions?

Reread the thread Rag. Read where it says "big FoS on you Charle" to start. That's one box ticked.

Besides does it matter? He has a GUILTY report and im not buying the bomb thing.

Charles claims not making sense to me, where are we at on votes

It matters. If you're a lyncher, you might win the game if we get rid of Charle. You've typed it out, several times, as if you have a Charle spreadsheet that you're referring to.

I would not be surprised if we are being played by Sonic, but Charle's claim seems to farfetched, if it was a casino in Oklahoma, then maybe
So I will follow along, and pray that we are right.

Vote Charle

poker table: Charle, Extreme Ways, Devante, Ragian, jfm

Devante wrote:Charles claims not making sense to me, where are we at on votes

If I counted right, then my vote now put Charle to 6

Las Vegas Police has a sheriff.. im the town sheriff. No tricks. And more then happy to receive a counterclaim. It can only come from scum but that would be stupid on D2. Hence why i would be happy. And the other way around: no counterclaim means im the sheriff, and why i need protection tonight.

SoN!c wrote:

Loose Canon wrote:

A little game with goody bag to be won;
Any player who in bold red can guess the names of 5 (other than themselves) of the 6 players at the poker table wins the goody bag.

You only have to guess 5 of the 6.

Big FoS on those who are trying to look benighted (wearing too powerful sunglassses at the poker table so they can't see shit anymore)

Yes, that's you Charle!

Charle wrote: I must say, I cannot see any proof of scum from anybody yet.

He always says that when he is scum himself.

Charle wrote:I was at first also thinking what boxes of mine were ticked, but then Sonic told us he was just rattling some cages.

I would like to know what Max and King has to say, just anything to know that they are still with us.

Only if your scum, you would question yourself thinking "did i slip up somewhere"

PS: watch out for the bus