Page 10 of 24
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 10:05 am
by ga7
Pikanchion wrote:Well, seeing as this isn't going to go away otherwise: I am the town's roleblocker. I had hoped to avoid having to counter claim as it seemed obvious that ga7 was scum, last night I roleblocked Fircoal, which is why I was also suspicious of them clearing Djfireside.

That's BS, even with a possible busdrive there's no way this game has another blocker. So I can block, Nag can block, Samlen kinda hinted at it and now you?
What's your name?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 10:13 am
by ga7
Btw I love how this post of yours reads now:
Pikanchion wrote:A large part of ga7's claim to being town sided relies upon Fircoal being town (and being so in an obvious manner based solely on their role's name), as such if ga7 is town then we can be sure that Fircoal is too. We also know that even if ga7 isn't scum they can become scum, and can we really trust their word on the exact mechanisms for this happening? Looks to me that a ga7 lynch at worst gives us two confirmed town (as Fircoal would also clear Djfireside).
My big problem however is the timeline of what happened last night; nagerous picks ga7 and Fircoal to <appropriate verb>, ga7 tries to roleblock nagerous, Fircoal investigates Djfireside. nagerous is not roleblocked and successfully <verbs> ga7 and Fircoal, effectively roleblocking ga7, but somehow Fircoal still manages to successfully investigate Djfireside? Something certainly doesn't seem to add up here.
So you had hoped to not have to counterclaim? But waited so long to vote me? And this wishywashy stuff is what you mean by being suspicious of Fircoal? This post shows so much your conviction that I needed to be lynched for having the same role as you

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 11:15 am
by Pikanchion
Well saying we should lynch you because I have the same role and pressing hard for a lynch would very much defeat the point of trying to not claim, wouldn't it?
Pointing out that Fircoal couldn't have investigated Djfireside and that there are contradictions in other players' accounts of events is wishywashy? Both you and Fircoal had (from my perspective) clear signs of being scum, you for obvious reasons and Fircoal for apparently lying about investigating Djfireside while roleblocked if not once but twice over at the time I made that post. The fact it seemed largely implausible that both of you could be scum after Fircoal revealed your role certainly gave me some doubt however.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 11:16 am
by Ragian
This is brilliant. Has everyone but me claimed, then? Let's just hand scum a shipping cart too.
So Pika is a roleblocker too? Surely, there are too many blockers. Lynching Ga7 may generate two trusted townies, and if Ga7 is indeed town, we know to go for Pika. I can live with that.
vote Ga7
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 5:26 pm
by Skittles!
Vote count
Ga7 (5) - nagerous, samlen, lord voldemort, pika, ragian
Pika (1) - skoffin
With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.
That's a lynch! I will post the scene soon, you guys are gonna love it cause I'm actually sober for this one.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 5:51 pm
by lord voldemort
I personally would of preferred you to be drunk at 830 in the morning
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 5:56 pm
by Skittles!
The Day moved slowly. Slow enough for a mini game and a roast could happen. That's how slow you guys are posting. A prize was given out. The Townsfolk tried to make the best of their situation, with Breeders in the mix. It was unfortunate that the townsfolk had to turn on each other before they could fully agree on who was what.
But then disaster struck. The Ambitious Old Lady on the Corner was outed for her scheming, not being trusted by many. For good reason, she had venereal diseases and no one likes dealing with those. Unfortunately, not even thousands of extra bacteria could keep her alive even if she gained followers in the form of human beings.
Ga7 - The Ambitious Old Lady on the Corner (Usurper Hooker/Cult Leader) has been lynched.
It's now Night 2, please send in your actions.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 6:29 pm
by Skittles!
The Day was slow. So slow that a mini game that involved nothing in particular but the complete and utter embarrassment of Ga7 by his own volition. So it was pretty good overall. The Day was slow like the Last of the Trinity's slow death of boredom (or posion) because they never posted. At least this death is not in vain, as there is still power in this one to change the course of the Breeder situation in the village.
As for the Ambitious Old Lady on the Corner... well, let's just say that she didn't really get a chance to exact her plans. The prize was given to her because of the continued embarrassment of her existence, so it's probably good that she finally has left this earth, and all the venereal diseases that she collected along the way.
Djfireside - The Last of the Trinity (Restless Spirit) has been killed.
Ga7 - The Ambitious Old Lady on the Corner (Usurper Hooker/Cult Leader) has been lynched.
It is now Night 2, please send in your actions.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Night 2, hallelu
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 6:26 am
by Skittles!
Night... Night was quiet. That is all.
Day 3 has begun. With 7 alive, it takes only 4 to lynch.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 6:33 am
by Skoffin
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:29 am
by Ragian
Good stuff. Perhaps a roleblock has saved the day.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:32 am
by Ragian
Huh...I must have a shortcut for sending. I wasn't quite done. We should hear from our power roles if they have anything to report.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:52 am
by Fircoal
That's a good thing that nothing happened.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 3:04 pm
by Pikanchion
I may or may not have been invited to dinner, and I was not told that my action failed, but I was told that either myself or my potential fellow diner would be the target of a roleblock... So... Before it is revealed which of us were the roleblocked diner I think it may be important to ask: was anybody else roleblocked last night?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 4:39 pm
by lord voldemort
I may of been. I again got 4 obscure options. Picked one. And then was told due to other actions my choice did nothing. (Paraphrasing)
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 5:03 pm
by nagerous
Subject suggests I was protected. Yes I bussy'd you pika
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 5:08 pm
by Pikanchion
Well I did indeed target lord voldemort with my roleblock, so... Your bussy got the wrong target a second time?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 8:52 pm
by Skoffin
Before you all get too excited I lied about being a doctor and I do believe the real doctor protected me assuming scum would murder a doctor claim. whoop whoop
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:32 pm
by Samlen
Remember that nag's bussy seemed to only have blocked one of the two people the previous day. So i'm guessing nag's second target was the one that was blocked? Unless ga lied about being blocked, which would bring up the question of whether we have a cultist running around still.
@Pika why did you block lord volde and would you care to at least name yourself or explain more about your role? I'm not sure what level of town-confirmed volde is to other people but he's pretty much 100% cleared in my eyes, making me wonder why you blocked him.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 11:48 pm
by Pikanchion
I am a standard roleblocker, nothing more. lord voldemort's role is suspicious and certainly could be scum, I'm sure that to you (as the role-enabler and potential scum partner) they must logically share your alignment, but unlike you I cannot be sure of your alignment either.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 12:53 am
by lord voldemort
ga7 wrote:I'm sad that paranoia got the better of you nag, my last wish before channeling LSU is to not f*ck up and at least look at Pika.
this is the thoughts i want to get other opinion on today...
if we back ga7 at his word. the fact that sam is my enabler i am only 100% confident in the two of us atm. and probably nagerous.
do we assume ga7 is a regular cult leader...or do we take his word that if we lynched gf then he became the gf?
if he is cult leader then we have to assume he recruited someone night 1.
leaves with likely 2 scum 1 cult and 4 town...
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 2:14 am
by Ragian
I would bank on the presence of another cult member, but is that really important? The remaining member can't recruit, right? I think scumhunting is top priority.
@LoVo, were you made aware that there was an enabler to your role?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 3:03 am
by lord voldemort
yep. in my original role pm
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 3:59 am
by Ragian
Then, obviously, you two are connected in terms of roles. I have never seen an enabler be of different alignment than the player she/he enables, but my experience with enablers isn't that vast. If, however, I were to conclude that Samlen and LoVo are of the same alignment, I would guess 3rd party or town (can you be third party and together?) because the kill that LoVo has confessed to played out as stated. That's what I'm basing my guess on.
That leaves: chu, nag, pika, and skoffin.
- I'm putting chu in the confirmed town list because he "cleared" DJF before he flipped.
- I would presume that nag is town based on the information on epicmafia, but I haven't played with a chef before and I don't know if there's a similar scum role.
- Then there's pika who hasn't been that committed and haven't given us his name despite role claiming.
- Then there's skoffin who has confirmed that she has lied about her role and takes part claim of the lack of nightkill.
It's the latter two I'm looking at (if disregarding Samlen and LoVo).
Actions:
- Nag invited Pika and ???
- Pika roleblocked LoVo (which went through)
- Chu investigated ???
We can piece this together if we get all the clues. I might even think that it's mass claim time (well, that means skoffin and I...and Pika's name).
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 4:13 am
by Skoffin
I claimed doctor to be targeted. I was targeted last night and saved. I'm not claiming though cause I'm too cool for that.
I'm always hesitant to assume two connected roles must be of the same alignment, as it can clear two people or doom a scumteam that way. As such I'd say they could both be telling the truth about their role, but be any combination of alignment.
Any other pieces of info from the night would be handy to determine how to proceed from here.