Conquer Club

jak111 wrote:Unvote

I am curious as to what roles will help us through the night, but with a mod confirmation of double vote it is clear Illiad is town.

Hensow wrote:The dead lines fast aproching with no substantial case on the table so I'm going to vote no lynch

Hensow wrote:So as not to see an innocent die

VioIet wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'm not really sure what you want? It's not like I can do much Day 1 aside from building pointless cases or taking sides on pointless cases. And I'm sure I'm not the only one posting what one might call "fluff". It's easy to be in the midst of things and seem like you're doing more than you are. I mean, many of you are trying way too hard to find something in that post of mine. I feel like that's evidence enough that we've yet again accomplished very little Day 1.

My whole thing is I'm simply stopping in to say, "hello," and let you all know I'm keeping track of the conversation. There's not much else to do without a little night action-action.

-Sully

I understand what you are saying Victor, but you did say that you had a win condition. No one told you to say that. You can't backtrack now. Needless to say, not many have voted you, myself included. So though your posts provoked suspicion, we can't really say that you are scummy yet. But you know the nature of day one; people take what little they have and run away with it. If you don't want us discussing your win condition, why mention it in the first place? And now you've hinted that you have a night action. So you are a character with both a win condition and a night action. Interesting.

edocsil wrote:There will be some unique roles in this game, and it is certainly no vanilla.

edocsil wrote:
Player with the most votes at deadline will be hung. Tie results in a No Lynch.

Hensow wrote:

edocsil wrote:
Player with the most votes at deadline will be hung. Tie results in a No Lynch.

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'm not really sure what you want? It's not like I can do much Day 1 aside from building pointless cases or taking sides on pointless cases. And I'm sure I'm not the only one posting what one might call "fluff". It's easy to be in the midst of things and seem like you're doing more than you are. I mean, many of you are trying way too hard to find something in that post of mine. I feel like that's evidence enough that we've yet again accomplished very little Day 1.

My whole thing is I'm simply stopping in to say, "hello," and let you all know I'm keeping track of the conversation. There's not much else to do without a little night action-action.

-Sully

Iliad wrote:It will be very ironic if I, pressured because of inactivity, am lynched because the people who jumped on my wagon are inactive themselves and don't take away their vote.

Also would someone be lynched even if there's only say two votes on him?

Iliad wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'm not really sure what you want? It's not like I can do much Day 1 aside from building pointless cases or taking sides on pointless cases. And I'm sure I'm not the only one posting what one might call "fluff". It's easy to be in the midst of things and seem like you're doing more than you are. I mean, many of you are trying way too hard to find something in that post of mine. I feel like that's evidence enough that we've yet again accomplished very little Day 1.

My whole thing is I'm simply stopping in to say, "hello," and let you all know I'm keeping track of the conversation. There's not much else to do without a little night action-action.

-Sully

But all you do is post fluff. There essentially wasn't a difference between what I did, which was outright inactivity, and what you did, which was still zero contribution.

I don't see why it's looking in too hard, considering you've coyly suggested you have a non-town win condition and that you're "enjoying" but not participating in town discussion.

strike wolf wrote:Vote Hensow

Easiest way to prevent an Iliad mislynch.

soundman wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Vote Hensow

Easiest way to prevent an Iliad mislynch.

Agreed. Vote Hensow. Now both have four votes so that will keep us from having an Iliad mislynch.

safariguy5 wrote:I'm not buying your explanation sully. Saying you have a win condition is like saying the sky is blue. As you yourself pointed out, everyone has a WC. So your post about said win condition adds nothing to your post.

Victor Sullivan wrote:But, of course, I'm not against voting an active player off 100% of the time... I do have a win condition after all.

-Sully

safariguy5 wrote:I understand it's harder to make cases on day 1, but it does not mean that one can simply skate through the day without saying anything.

safariguy5 wrote:There's no guarantee that night actions will turn up something useful right away and that's just lazy play to pull the Day 1 low activity card, especially for someone who's been playing for awhile. Trying to justify the WC comment as anything more than fluff is not credible either.

unvote vote Sully