Conquer Club

Seulessliathan wrote:I avoided BOB for a long time, and i made General without BOB. Since i added BOB, success seems to have stopped, i felt down to Colonel. I seriously believe that you play more carful without BOB. But it´s more time consuming. I got lazy, so i started to use it. But BOB only saves you some time counting stuff, it doesn´t give you any advantage you couldn´t have without using BOB.
So using BOB or not is just a question of how much time you want to put in each game. You get a better overview if you play without BOB, because you spent more time looking at the board, checking the options and you understand stuff like the bonus system, you don´t simply check by BOB if you have a bonus or not.

Denise wrote:

Seulessliathan wrote:I avoided BOB for a long time, and i made General without BOB. Since i added BOB, success seems to have stopped, i felt down to Colonel. I seriously believe that you play more carful without BOB. But it´s more time consuming. I got lazy, so i started to use it. But BOB only saves you some time counting stuff, it doesn´t give you any advantage you couldn´t have without using BOB.
So using BOB or not is just a question of how much time you want to put in each game. You get a better overview if you play without BOB, because you spent more time looking at the board, checking the options and you understand stuff like the bonus system, you don´t simply check by BOB if you have a bonus or not.

I am sure you are right about playing more carefully and understanding the bonuses better without BOB, though I can't imagine doing it. I guess I am too lazy. It is such a useful tool and I am so used to it that if I didn't play with it, I would be insecure and always think I was missing stuff. One of the most useful things about it is seeing immediately what the tert counts are.

dowian2 wrote:Brilliant analogy. You're such a good writer, you should write a book or something

niMic wrote:This is a fairly unbelievable score, so far. EMPIRE were always good, but...

Beckytheblondie wrote:

niMic wrote:This is a fairly unbelievable score, so far. EMPIRE were always good, but...

...They weren't invented at McGill University?
...until now they were always robots?
...maybe my tourniquet isn't tied tightly enough?
...The Rolling Stones were better?
...I always imagined them to look a little like Actor Michael Sheen.
...But beating TOFU was something I always pictured Asians doing, instead?
...would be better with Beckytheblondie? <<< this
...who thought that they would also beat the Red Tritons in the Southwest Manchester Region Little Kicker's Football Cup?
...

Beckytheblondie wrote:

niMic wrote:This is a fairly unbelievable score, so far. EMPIRE were always good, but...

...They weren't invented at McGill University?
...until now they were always robots?
...maybe my tourniquet isn't tied tightly enough?
...The Rolling Stones were better?
...I always imagined them to look a little like Actor Michael Sheen.
...But beating TOFU was something I always pictured Asians doing, instead?
...would be better with Beckytheblondie?
...who thought that they would also beat the Red Tritons in the Southwest Manchester Region Little Kicker's Football Cup?
...

malevolous wrote:I'm showing 22-7, can someone update?

TheSpaceCowboy wrote:

Iron Maid wrote:

malevolous wrote:I'm showing 22-7, can someone update?

I've updated it. Also wished it was 22-7. Unfortunately it's 7-22.

Lubawski wrote:You should see the ones he made that we deemed were not appropriate for public viewing.

malevolous wrote:

Lubawski wrote:You should see the ones he made that we deemed were not appropriate for public viewing.

Which one?

TheSpaceCowboy wrote:

malevolous wrote:

Lubawski wrote:You should see the ones he made that we deemed were not appropriate for public viewing.

Which one?

LOL. . . .it is a joke. ...

Iron Maid wrote:

TheSpaceCowboy wrote:

malevolous wrote:

Lubawski wrote:You should see the ones he made that we deemed were not appropriate for public viewing.

Which one?

LOL. . . .it is a joke. ...

Like this whole challenge.

Georgerx7di wrote:Damn, that's pretty impressive Empire, nicely done. Maybe if we're lucky, we will get that challenge against you guys after all.

lord voldemort wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:Damn, that's pretty impressive Empire, nicely done. Maybe if we're lucky, we will get that challenge against you guys after all.

oh so now you want to play us



I kid....it sucked that challenge fell through. We did stacks of prep for it

Lubawski wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:Damn, that's pretty impressive Empire, nicely done. Maybe if we're lucky, we will get that challenge against you guys after all.

oh so now you want to play us



I kid....it sucked that challenge fell through. We did stacks of prep for it

I think I deleted that PM where we had all 30 home games with settings and teams set. I chalked it up to "that's never going to happen." We've had several roster moves since then anyway, so it would have to change.

As for the Monkis, it would be great to take you on in the challenge. It would mean we got past FOED as well.

lord voldemort wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:Damn, that's pretty impressive Empire, nicely done. Maybe if we're lucky, we will get that challenge against you guys after all.

oh so now you want to play us



I kid....it sucked that challenge fell through. We did stacks of prep for it