Conquer Club

MeDeFe wrote:

Tyr wrote:this may be a bit late but lay off talking about marines alot of my buddies are in afghanistan now and i go soon. a bunch of kids with enough balls to stand up and go to the most dangerous place on earth so that you can sit your nasty disgusting gelatinous ass in a chair and bitch about how much they suck. 234 years of honor courage and commitment serving our country does not deserve this

If you're that old you should've retired sometime in the 1830s, at the absolutely latest.

Surely he would have been dead by then, especially for the life expectancies from those days...

you know how it is with internet tough-guys they are all karate-expert marines who can live to 234..

Titanic wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

Tyr wrote:this may be a bit late but lay off talking about marines alot of my buddies are in afghanistan now and i go soon. a bunch of kids with enough balls to stand up and go to the most dangerous place on earth so that you can sit your nasty disgusting gelatinous ass in a chair and bitch about how much they suck. 234 years of honor courage and commitment serving our country does not deserve this

If you're that old you should've retired sometime in the 1830s, at the absolutely latest.

Surely he would have been dead by then, especially for the life expectancies from those days...

60 and even 70 years was relatively easily doable even back then, at least once you got through the first one and a half decades. A high child mortality lowers the average age of a population by a fair amount.

MeDeFe wrote:

Titanic wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

Tyr wrote:this may be a bit late but lay off talking about marines alot of my buddies are in afghanistan now and i go soon. a bunch of kids with enough balls to stand up and go to the most dangerous place on earth so that you can sit your nasty disgusting gelatinous ass in a chair and bitch about how much they suck. 234 years of honor courage and commitment serving our country does not deserve this

If you're that old you should've retired sometime in the 1830s, at the absolutely latest.

Surely he would have been dead by then, especially for the life expectancies from those days...

60 and even 70 years was relatively easily doable even back then, at least once you got through the first one and a half decades. A high child mortality lowers the average age of a population by a fair amount.

Yes but in the USA they present child mortality rates differently, nobody really dies because US healthcare is the greatest.

joecoolfrog wrote:Yes but in the USA they present child mortality rates differently, nobody really dies because US healthcare is the greatest.

Finally someone gets it!

thegreekdog wrote:

joecoolfrog wrote:Yes but in the USA they present child mortality rates differently, nobody really dies because US healthcare is the greatest.

Finally someone gets it!

joecoolfrog wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

Titanic wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

Tyr wrote:this may be a bit late but lay off talking about marines alot of my buddies are in afghanistan now and i go soon. a bunch of kids with enough balls to stand up and go to the most dangerous place on earth so that you can sit your nasty disgusting gelatinous ass in a chair and bitch about how much they suck. 234 years of honor courage and commitment serving our country does not deserve this

If you're that old you should've retired sometime in the 1830s, at the absolutely latest.

Surely he would have been dead by then, especially for the life expectancies from those days...

60 and even 70 years was relatively easily doable even back then, at least once you got through the first one and a half decades. A high child mortality lowers the average age of a population by a fair amount.

Yes but in the USA they present child mortality rates differently, nobody really dies because US healthcare is the greatest.

Even in the early 19th century?

Tyr wrote:this may be a bit late but lay off talking about marines alot of my buddies are in afghanistan now and i go soon. a bunch of kids with enough balls to stand up and go to the most dangerous place on earth so that you can sit your nasty disgusting gelatinous ass in a chair and bitch about how much they suck. 234 years of honor courage and commitment serving our country does not deserve this

Chill .... it's just people on the internet, in my experience they're mostly wrong.

But you're right ... regardless of whether you agree with a war or not, for the most part the people on the ground have very little to do with those choices. Best of luck out there, mate. I'd not swap places with ya, very few would - which is something for you to take pride in. You've more balls than the rest of the internet put together probably

anonymus wrote:

Borderdawg wrote:

anonymus wrote:yeah and "home of the brave" bombing the shit out of the 3rd world, (wait let me get a dictionary).. yes, actually that IS the definition of bravery.. its right here "Bravery (noun); hitting someone who are unable to defend themselves"

Need some cheese to go with your whine? Here's some Fumunda for ya!

Your argument is not even an argument and therefor invalid. I on the other hand make a very good case in only 2 (somewhat sarcastic) lines..

fuckin fag

JACKAZZTJM wrote:fuckin fag

JACKAZZTJM wrote:

anonymus wrote:

Borderdawg wrote:

anonymus wrote:yeah and "home of the brave" bombing the shit out of the 3rd world, (wait let me get a dictionary).. yes, actually that IS the definition of bravery.. its right here "Bravery (noun); hitting someone who are unable to defend themselves"

Need some cheese to go with your whine? Here's some Fumunda for ya!

Your argument is not even an argument and therefor invalid. I on the other hand make a very good case in only 2 (somewhat sarcastic) lines..

fuckin fag

Once again we are privileged to be the recipients the informed commentary of the intellectual elite.

If you can't best them in intelligent conversation then lash out with verbal attacks, and if that fails, then violence is the next turn of events.

Tell me again how far we have advanced beyond apes?

jonesthecurl wrote:

JACKAZZTJM wrote:

anonymus wrote:

Borderdawg wrote:

anonymus wrote:yeah and "home of the brave" bombing the shit out of the 3rd world, (wait let me get a dictionary).. yes, actually that IS the definition of bravery.. its right here "Bravery (noun); hitting someone who are unable to defend themselves"

Need some cheese to go with your whine? Here's some Fumunda for ya!

JACKAZZTJM wrote:
Your argument is not even an argument and therefor invalid. I on the other hand make a very good case in only 2 (somewhat sarcastic) lines..

fuckin fag

Once again we are privileged to be the recipients the informed commentary of the intellectual elite.

--------------
SIGNATURE
JACKAZZTJM› yea off to myspace a depressing social networking site with no social interaction! thats y i like cc at least u gotta use ur mind to hang on here!
--------------
yes obviously that is really your forte..

notyou2 wrote:If you can't best them in intelligent conversation then lash out with verbal attacks, and if that fails, then violence is the next turn of events.

Tell me again how far we have advanced beyond apes?

We are apes.

I agree, and it has been reinforced once again by the intellectual elite of the right. god help us.

notyou2 wrote:I agree, and it has been reinforced once again by the intellectual elite of the right. god help us.

What god?

comic boy wrote:Somewhat ironic given that the United States has the largest prison population in the World, both in actual numbers and as a per capita percentage.

That's why there's a term "libero-fascist" as the liberal freedom is more pretty much only an illusion if what we want is a true freedom

Skittles! wrote:

notyou2 wrote:I agree, and it has been reinforced once again by the intellectual elite of the right. god help us.

What god?

Not my god, he doesn't exist. I put that in there for the right. They like to hear things like that once in awhile....kinda puffs them all up with pride.

notyou2 wrote:If you can't best them in intelligent conversation then lash out with verbal attacks, and if that fails, then violence is the next turn of events.

Tell me again how far we have advanced beyond apes?

We got guns.

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

notyou2 wrote:If you can't best them in intelligent conversation then lash out with verbal attacks, and if that fails, then violence is the next turn of events.

Tell me again how far we have advanced beyond apes?

We got guns.

well good substitute for a brain you could argue..

The old adage...."Might is right"

notyou2 wrote:The old adage...."Might is right"

..."the pen is mightier then the sword"

Titanic wrote:

notyou2 wrote:The old adage...."Might is right"

..."the pen is mightier then the sword"

"unless the sword is very sharp and the pen rather blunt"

anonymus wrote:

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

notyou2 wrote:If you can't best them in intelligent conversation then lash out with verbal attacks, and if that fails, then violence is the next turn of events.

Tell me again how far we have advanced beyond apes?

We got guns.

well good substitute for a brain you could argue..

Brains are overrated.

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

anonymus wrote:

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

notyou2 wrote:If you can't best them in intelligent conversation then lash out with verbal attacks, and if that fails, then violence is the next turn of events.

Tell me again how far we have advanced beyond apes?

We got guns.

well good substitute for a brain you could argue..

Brains are overrated.

As we can tell.