Page 9 of 13

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:53 am
by DiM
........

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:11 am
by rebelman
thanks for you support (all 3 posts DiM) - to further expand on my above point here was the distribution on jan 8

Code: Select all

score   no of players   % of active total   running total
1-99   1   0.005%   0.005%
100-199   2   0.009%   0.014%
200-299   9   0.042%   0.056%
300-399   16   0.075%   0.131%
400-499   62   0.290%   0.421%
500-599   171   0.799%   1.220%
600-699   439   2.051%   3.271%
700-799   996   4.654%   7.926%
800-899   2210   10.328%   18.253%
900-999   6251   29.212%   47.465%
1000-1099   2964   13.851%   61.316%
1100-1199   2079   9.715%   71.031%
1200-1399   1545   7.220%   78.251%
1300-1499   1245   5.818%   84.069%
1400-1499   943   4.407%   88.476%
1500-1599   703   3.285%   91.761%
1600-1699   511   2.388%   94.149%
1700-1799   370   1.729%   95.878%
1800-1899   269   1.257%   97.135%
1900-1999   190   0.888%   98.023%
2000-2099   111   0.519%   98.542%
2100-2199   97   0.453%   98.995%
2200-2299   56   0.262%   99.257%
2300-2399   45   0.210%   99.467%
2400-2499   28   0.131%   99.598%
2500-2599   23   0.107%   99.706%
2600-2699   21   0.098%   99.804%
2700-2799   10   0.047%   99.850%
2800-2899   7   0.033%   99.883%
2900-2999   8   0.037%   99.921%
3000-3099   6   0.028%   99.949%
3100-3199   3   0.014%   99.963%
3200-3299   1   0.005%   99.967%
3300-3399   0   0.000%   99.967%
3400-3499   2   0.009%   99.977%
3500-3599   2   0.009%   99.986%
3600-3699   0   0.000%   99.986%
3700-3799   0   0.000%   99.986%
3800-3899   1   0.005%   99.991%
3900-3999   0   0.000%   99.991%
4000-4099   0   0.000%   99.991%
4100-4199   1   0.005%   99.995%
4200-4299   0   0.000%   99.995%
4300-2399   0   0.000%   99.995%
4400-4499   1   0.005%   100.000%


The average score of these 21,399 players is 1116.4 (the averege score of the 152,728 inactive players is 983.7)

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:32 am
by negoeien
majors and above are only 0.43%
colonels and above are only 0.09%


woot!! I'm at the top O,50 % of all active players.
Well guys that actually makes me happy :d

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:33 am
by rebelman
negoeien wrote:majors and above are only 0.43%
colonels and above are only 0.09%


woot!! I'm at the top O,50 % of all active players.
Well guys that actually makes me happy :d


we aim to please

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:39 am
by negoeien
you did man, cool stats

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:18 am
by DiM
negoeien wrote:majors and above are only 0.43%
colonels and above are only 0.09%


woot!! I'm at the top O,50 % of all active players.
Well guys that actually makes me happy :d


BUT remember that this doesn't mean you are within the top 0.5% best players. you're among the top 0.5% highest ranked.

highest rank doesn't mean best player.

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:20 am
by rebelman
DiM wrote:
BUT remember that this doesn't mean you are within the top 0.5% best players. you're among the top 0.5% highest ranked.

highest rank doesn't mean best player.


true but dont shatter his happiness you party pooper

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:26 am
by DiM
rebelman wrote:
DiM wrote:
BUT remember that this doesn't mean you are within the top 0.5% best players. you're among the top 0.5% highest ranked.

highest rank doesn't mean best player.


true but dont shatter his happiness you party pooper


i'm not a party pooper :cry:

i'm more like the dark rain cloud that's hovering over your parade waiting to release my storm :twisted:

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:27 am
by Blitzaholic
rebelman wrote:thanks for you support (all 3 posts DiM) - to further expand on my above point here was the distribution on jan 8

Code: Select all

score   no of players   % of active total   running total
1-99   1   0.005%   0.005%
100-199   2   0.009%   0.014%
200-299   9   0.042%   0.056%
300-399   16   0.075%   0.131%
400-499   62   0.290%   0.421%
500-599   171   0.799%   1.220%
600-699   439   2.051%   3.271%
700-799   996   4.654%   7.926%
800-899   2210   10.328%   18.253%
900-999   6251   29.212%   47.465%
1000-1099   2964   13.851%   61.316%
1100-1199   2079   9.715%   71.031%
1200-1399   1545   7.220%   78.251%
1300-1499   1245   5.818%   84.069%
1400-1499   943   4.407%   88.476%
1500-1599   703   3.285%   91.761%
1600-1699   511   2.388%   94.149%
1700-1799   370   1.729%   95.878%
1800-1899   269   1.257%   97.135%
1900-1999   190   0.888%   98.023%
2000-2099   111   0.519%   98.542%
2100-2199   97   0.453%   98.995%
2200-2299   56   0.262%   99.257%
2300-2399   45   0.210%   99.467%
2400-2499   28   0.131%   99.598%
2500-2599   23   0.107%   99.706%
2600-2699   21   0.098%   99.804%
2700-2799   10   0.047%   99.850%
2800-2899   7   0.033%   99.883%
2900-2999   8   0.037%   99.921%
3000-3099   6   0.028%   99.949%
3100-3199   3   0.014%   99.963%
3200-3299   1   0.005%   99.967%
3300-3399   0   0.000%   99.967%
3400-3499   2   0.009%   99.977%
3500-3599   2   0.009%   99.986%
3600-3699   0   0.000%   99.986%
3700-3799   0   0.000%   99.986%
3800-3899   1   0.005%   99.991%
3900-3999   0   0.000%   99.991%
4000-4099   0   0.000%   99.991%
4100-4199   1   0.005%   99.995%
4200-4299   0   0.000%   99.995%
4300-2399   0   0.000%   99.995%
4400-4499   1   0.005%   100.000%


The average score of these 21,399 players is 1116.4 (the averege score of the 152,728 inactive players is 983.7)



you got good points rebel, however, how many of them are active that are 1100 score to 200???

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:31 am
by rebelman
blitz all are on the scoreboard so all have been active within the last month - there may be a certain amount of inactives between 1100 and 900 (noobs who joined and left again) but none of these players would have dropped as low as cook so the vast majority of cooks are active players who keep losing consistently.

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:37 am
by rebelman
before looking at the figures i already suspected this was the case as its so rare seeing sgts and higher in public games - i used to think this was because they stuck to private games - however its not quite clear that there really are much few of them which gos a long way in explaining this absence.

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:44 am
by Blitzaholic
yeah, that is difficult to figure out

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:27 pm
by Vish
Without inflation, there is almost no chance of anyone becoming field marshal. But, maybe a way to deal with inflation if it becomes an issue is that every once and awhile all players would lose 10% of there rank. Or just remember that certain ranks don't quite mean what they used to.

Re: 2K common 2.5K challenging

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:49 am
by DiM
updated those marked with !!!

Blitzaholic wrote:
455 Captains-CC record!!!

96 Majors-CC record!!!

21 Colonels-CC record

7 Brigadiers-CC record

1 Conquerer

2 Generals-CC record!!!

0 Field Marshall




Code: Select all

96     NUKE     2502     863     260 (30%)     Major     52-2     United States 

Code: Select all

3     Warsteiner     4204     2065     1142 (55%)     General     135-19     Netherlands 

Code: Select all

455     Sultan     2000     148     92 (62%)     Captain     8-0     United States

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:39 am
by Warsteiner
we have 2 generals now =)

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:47 am
by DiM
Warsteiner wrote:we have 2 generals now =)


i fastposted you by 2 hours and 50 minutes

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:07 pm
by Blitzaholic
Vish wrote:Without inflation, there was almost no chance of anyone becoming field marshal.



agreed, I said this like 9 months ago, but now with the inflation boom it will be possible sometime in mid to late 2008 perhaps.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:09 pm
by Blitzaholic
DiM wrote:
Warsteiner wrote:we have 2 generals now =)


i fastposted you by 2 hours and 50 minutes



:lol: LMAOff


well there was 3 players with 4200 plus at one point

Re: CC's Records of RANKS

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:45 am
by Blitzaholic
Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?

maybe you dont :lol:


455 Captains-CC record

96 Majors-CC record

21 Colonels-CC record

7 Brigadiers-CC record

1 Conquerer

3 Generals-CC record

0 Field Marshall



updated

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:18 am
by amazzony
DiM wrote:
negoeien wrote:majors and above are only 0.43%
colonels and above are only 0.09%


woot!! I'm at the top O,50 % of all active players.
Well guys that actually makes me happy :d


BUT remember that this doesn't mean you are within the top 0.5% best players. you're among the top 0.5% highest ranked.

highest rank doesn't mean best player.


Actually, he might be one of the best players (or in the top 0.5%) because he plays in a lot of tournaments and he plays with a lot of different settings (at least as much as I know).

*mumbles something like sorry for off topic and leaves*

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:21 am
by Sir. Ricco
Either the top players are getting smarter or the bottom players are getting dumber. :lol:

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:53 am
by Blitzaholic
new record captain 496

Re: CC's Records of RANKS

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:22 am
by Blitzaholic
remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?

maybe you dont :lol:


496 Captains-CC record

96 Majors-CC record

21 Colonels-CC record

7 Brigadiers-CC record

1 Conquerer

3 Generals-CC record

0 Field Marshall



updated

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:58 pm
by Blitzaholic
it just grows and grows :lol:

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:07 pm
by Blitzaholic
501 captains plus