Page 9 of 24
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 12:24 pm
by Fircoal
Vote: LV I like the case that was brought up against him. His voting pattern doesn't fit with what a town player should do and his fishing for information seems fishy.
It's rational why Frenchie-chan isn't voting considering the information he gave us.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 1:56 am
by Skoffin
HRHRHRGJ We are running out of time.
I doubt I'll survive another night anyway with my mucking around since claiming doctor and I can't be bothered keeping it up anymore lul.
Since no one is going to counterclaim you can let me lead HRRRN
We are going to run out of time if we don't get moving, at the moment our best bet for a lynch is Lovo but we can't just speed lynch him either; I suggest he claim soon if he wants to overturn his lynch as we may not be able to direct it elsewhere in time.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 3:12 am
by lord voldemort
was just waiting to get home before claiming but I am here now.
I have nothing to hide so I have no dramas full claiming.
I am the monopoly guy my role is dreaming god. my faction is town
the crux of it is for those that dont know. I get a choice of 4 actions. the actions are given an obscure title in that I have no idea what they do before picking them. Once picked the action I can the pick the person I want to use the action on.
My role is also enabled by a person.
Last night actions ended in me poisoning someone whom I chose dj. he will die during lynch (sorry to steal your thunder mod)
I had to use action and he was the most scummy that I felt from day 1 to fire on.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 3:50 am
by Samlen
Dang, I didn't realize I was enabling such an interesting role. For clarification, yes, I am partial claiming enabler to confirm lord voldemort's claim.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 4:20 am
by Ragian
Not the benign god I was hoping for...
So if we don't lynch, we keep dj alive? Or does the poison also work on no lynch? As in end of day.
unvote (in order to think)
So we know that Samlen and LoVo are connected. We know that chu has vouched for DJ, who, if everything holds up, will die today (depending on the clarification).
@LoVo, spell it out for me:
1) You are forced to choose an action (1-4) not knowing what it does.
2) You are informed of the power of the action.
3) You choose a target?
Can you chose yourself?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 4:21 am
by Ragian
Choose, damnit.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 4:44 am
by lord voldemort
unsure if i can choose myself. didnt ask and wasnt told. I did ask if i had to use it that night and use another night or if i can choose not to use it. I was told I had to use it then.
as for the if we no lynch he survives. unsure but i personally doubt it. he is poisoned and will die after time.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 4:48 am
by Skoffin
Okay so start again.
Nag interacted with Chu and ga7
Ga7 has a dumb but somewhat believable role because f*ck skittles
Chu stuck up for ga7 when it would be dumb to do so, and he sortof suggests DJ is good.
LoVo has a dumb role that is sortof believably because f*ck Skittles
He poisoned Dj, lol get rekt scrub
Samlen confirms LoVo's role
The only people that don't really have any connections to anything now are pika and ragian, so they might be the best place to start?
Of course any of the people mentioned could still have those roles and be scum, it's just... idk.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 5:47 am
by Skittles!
Vote count
Ga7 (3) - nagerous, samlen, lord voldemort
Lord Voldemort (1) - skoffin
With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch. Let's go huntiessssss.
I am putting a deadline for the day for 7PM 21/5 AEST. Roughly 3 days away.
EDIT: I will contact the winner of the challenge by PM
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 10:55 am
by Fircoal
Samlen wrote:Dang, I didn't realize I was enabling such an interesting role. For clarification, yes, I am partial claiming enabler to confirm lord voldemort's claim.
Enabler? What does that do? I'm confused about your two roles.
Also where is Pika?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 11:14 am
by ga7
I'm not sure I get Lovo's claim but I guess we'll see how it turns out. It reminds me a lot of the recent Balance not Included game here, some of you played that and can recall how it was used as a scum role. It seems weird that Skittles would pick a role since he seems to enjoy making shit up but it sounds like it can cause enough random fuckery that he would like it. It could perfectly be town or scum though. The Monopoly guy doesn't strike me as very fitting flavour either.
The only part that seems town-like I guess is picking Dj for his action. I suppose it makes more sense to first wait to see who Dj turns out to be. Dj, if you're town and had any relevant action it would be nice to know now since your days are numbered.
I also wonder if in this situation Samlen & Lovo would really be of the same alignment, since the death of the enabler would render the other powerless and seems harsh for their side?
At this point since we're pretty much guaranteed a death I'm not sure what to do. If Dj is town, another townie is mislynched and another gets NKed we would be quite fucked. On the other hand if everyone that claimed told the truth there's a high chance Pika or Ragian are scum. Between the two, one has been very scumarining so FOS Pika
Skoff, I found you helpful so far but you might be fooling me, why would you reiterate on your claim when you weirdly survived the night? Do you feel lucky, punk? Anyway wait and see...
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 11:17 am
by ga7
Fircoal wrote:Samlen wrote:Dang, I didn't realize I was enabling such an interesting role. For clarification, yes, I am partial claiming enabler to confirm lord voldemort's claim.
Enabler? What does that do? I'm confused about your two roles.
Also where is Pika?
Enabler is a role that allows another role to function.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 11:52 am
by nagerous
ga7 wrote:The PM I got said one of us was suffocated by bussy and my action was not successful. So either busdriver or mod switched it? Cause the whole thing wouldn't have happened if my action got through.
Killing me to prove 2 townies is fine and dandy but I really don't think highly of town's chances right now seeing you chumps ignoring pure scumminess.
Chu's powers can't be scum, that I'm sure of. Dj is only if he's not GF. But I find it very interesting that Lovo first tried to get Chu to spell out what was his power, then had to be pushed to vote me (cause he knows I'm town), then claims his second target is someone very likely cleared in Dj. How many tells do you people need?
I'm happy to kill you to prove two townies. You've confessed already that your role is likely to have the option to turn scum so I don't see any reason to keep you around, I know you well enough that if the option to turn scum presents itself then you wouldn't turn it down - especially with a usurping capacity
That being said, my vote stays - I know you tried to give away clues to your identity in the night phase but you must have realised you were potentially going to be exposed anyway so it makes sense to have a back up plan to look more town-ish, but I just can't get behind the usurper element of your role title. Two scummy role titles does not make one town sided player.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 11:56 am
by nagerous
Skoffin wrote: Okay so start again.
Nag interacted with Chu and ga7
Ga7 has a dumb but somewhat believable role because f*ck skittles
Chu stuck up for ga7 when it would be dumb to do so, and he sortof suggests DJ is good.
LoVo has a dumb role that is sortof believably because f*ck Skittles
He poisoned Dj, lol get rekt scrub
Samlen confirms LoVo's role
The only people that don't really have any connections to anything now are pika and ragian, so they might be the best place to start?
Of course any of the people mentioned could still have those roles and be scum, it's just... idk.
What if you protect DJ doktaaaa?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 11:56 am
by Pikanchion
ga7 wrote:Fircoal wrote:Samlen wrote:Dang, I didn't realize I was enabling such an interesting role. For clarification, yes, I am partial claiming enabler to confirm lord voldemort's claim.
Enabler? What does that do? I'm confused about your two roles.
Also where is Pika?
Enabler is a role that allows another role to function.
Well if we're going off what stuff means in other games suddenly...
Usurper is a scum aligned role that gets promoted upon the godfather's death.
Hooker is a scum aligned role that roleblocks.
Vote: ga7
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 11:58 am
by nagerous
nagerous wrote:Skoffin wrote: Okay so start again.
Nag interacted with Chu and ga7
Ga7 has a dumb but somewhat believable role because f*ck skittles
Chu stuck up for ga7 when it would be dumb to do so, and he sortof suggests DJ is good.
LoVo has a dumb role that is sortof believably because f*ck Skittles
He poisoned Dj, lol get rekt scrub
Samlen confirms LoVo's role
The only people that don't really have any connections to anything now are pika and ragian, so they might be the best place to start?
Of course any of the people mentioned could still have those roles and be scum, it's just... idk.
What if you protect DJ doktaaaa?
Though I would recommend you send some protection love my way, my role is pretty powerful, as I will be exposing another two more people's role titles in the night phase - therefore finding out who is lying about their role title. We already have exposed one usurper/hooker to the group - why people aren't backing this lynch is beyond me, I know ga7 is good at twisting the yarn but jeeeeez.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 12:15 pm
by Fircoal
Pikanchion wrote:ga7 wrote:Fircoal wrote:Samlen wrote:Dang, I didn't realize I was enabling such an interesting role. For clarification, yes, I am partial claiming enabler to confirm lord voldemort's claim.
Enabler? What does that do? I'm confused about your two roles.
Also where is Pika?
Enabler is a role that allows another role to function.
Well if we're going off what stuff means in other games suddenly...
Usurper is a scum aligned role that gets promoted upon the godfather's death.
Hooker is a scum aligned role that roleblocks.
Vote: ga7
Do you have anything else to add?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 12:17 pm
by ga7
I'm sad that paranoia got the better of you nag, my last wish before channeling LSU is to not f*ck up and at least look at Pika.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 5:16 pm
by lord voldemort
ga7 wrote:I'm sad that paranoia got the better of you nag, my last wish before channeling LSU is to not f*ck up and at least look at Pika.
Noted for sure
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 8:50 pm
by Skoffin
ga7 wrote:Skoff, I found you helpful so far but you might be fooling me, why would you reiterate on your claim when you weirdly survived the night? Do you feel lucky, punk? Anyway wait and see...
I think I got lucky or the scumteam didn't think about it, but now with more claims out it's a bit too obvious and my acting the fool to make them not want to kill me.. well honestly can't be bothered keeping it up XD YOLO
nagerous wrote:nagerous wrote:
What if you protect DJ doktaaaa?
Though I would recommend you send some protection love my way, my role is pretty powerful, as I will be exposing another two more people's role titles in the night phase - therefore finding out who is lying about their role title. We already have exposed one usurper/hooker to the group - why people aren't backing this lynch is beyond me, I know ga7 is good at twisting the yarn but jeeeeez.
Well I'm not protecting DJ; he's not useful and he might just die through it anyway. Not wasting my time there.
I'll definetly protect you tonight Nag, just make sure you get a good catch tonight and make my life somewhat useful lolol
I suppose it's best to use it on one of the unclaimed of ragian/pika and use the other to verify one of the current claims out there. Use your best judgement
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 7:41 am
by Pikanchion
Fircoal wrote:Do you have anything else to add?
What do you want to know?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 8:25 am
by Skoffin
Pika is scum
unvote vote pika
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 8:27 am
by nagerous
ga7 wrote:I'm sad that paranoia got the better of you nag, my last wish before channeling LSU is to not f*ck up and at least look at Pika.
Hmm pika has been pretty low key -I have been thinking about this and I don't know if it is worth keeping you about a bit. As you said we can lynch you later and as a usurper you may give us the keys/clues to the mafia GF who I am now highly suspecting actually is pika..
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 9:05 am
by ga7
I actually thought I was hammered by Pika but seems not
Alright then, I'll use the extra time to make some points.
nagerous wrote:I'm happy to kill you to prove two townies. You've confessed already that your role is likely to have the option to turn scum so I don't see any reason to keep you around, I know you well enough that if the option to turn scum presents itself then you wouldn't turn it down - especially with a usurping capacity
That being said, my vote stays - I know you tried to give away clues to your identity in the night phase but you must have realised you were potentially going to be exposed anyway so it makes sense to have a back up plan to look more town-ish, but I just can't get behind the usurper element of your role title. Two scummy role titles does not make one town sided player.
That's the thing though, I tried to help town because as it stands my WC is with town. I haven't voted because I want to avoid switching sides, but from town's perspective the only real doubt with my role is whether I turn GF when I participate in GF's lynch (as per my role) or when the GF dies. If I have to get lynched eventually I would much rather it happens only then, partly because it'd be easier to swallow for me to die when the GF is dead and town is less in danger of lylo and partly because I think I can help town meanwhile.
Skoffin wrote: I think I got lucky or the scumteam didn't think about it, but now with more claims out it's a bit too obvious and my acting the fool to make them not want to kill me.. well honestly can't be bothered keeping it up XD YOLO
That makes sense but I don't think scum not killing you was entirely dependent on your nonsense, oh well xD
nagerous wrote:Hmm pika has been pretty low key -I have been thinking about this and I don't know if it is worth keeping you about a bit. As you said we can lynch you later and as a usurper you may give us the keys/clues to the mafia GF who I am now highly suspecting actually is pika..
I had a good feeling about Lovo but I at least believe his roleclaim if not alignment-wise. So I'm pretty sure it's either Ragian or Pika but Pika's scumarining and voting timing makes him the best candidate to me. Pika making the "clearing 2 townies" point but not voting me previously when people looked on the fence and now voting for the same reasons right after you reiterated your argument, not chiming in at all about any other player, just reeks of scum.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 9:19 am
by Pikanchion
Well, seeing as this isn't going to go away otherwise: I am the town's roleblocker. I had hoped to avoid having to counter claim as it seemed obvious that ga7 was scum, last night I roleblocked Fircoal, which is why I was also suspicious of them clearing Djfireside.