Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:52 am
add me to the list.
ia m going for my tea
ia m going for my tea
Diddle
Duday53
Firth4eva
Minister Masket
Unriggable
Five candidates: Three Diplomats
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/
WELCOME TO SPAMALOT, THE FEW, THE PROUD, THE SPAMMY!!!!!!!!!
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=14072
Page 758 of 2036
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:53 am
Possible Candidates
Diddle
Duday53
Firth4eva
Minister Masket
Unriggable
Five candidates: Three Diplomats
Diddle
Duday53
Firth4eva
Minister Masket
Unriggable
Five candidates: Three Diplomats
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:53 am
screw the list, we wait for others
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:54 am
diddle wrote:screw the list, we wait for others
Fine, I'll keep a record of who runs.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:57 am
Damn skippy (bug)
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:59 am
ill run 
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:59 am
and get rid of minister whateverhisnameis, he hasn't even proven himself to be a worthy knight yet, he needs to be a more accomplished member to try out for this coveted role
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:00 pm
diddle wrote:and get rid of minister whateverhisnameis, he hasn't even proven himself to be a worthy knight yet, he needs to be a more accomplished member to try out for this coveted role
Who agrees with this? I'll take him off the list unless there's overwhelming objection.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:00 pm
0ojakeo0 wrote:ill run
You have 55 posts...
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:02 pm
0ojakeo0 wrote:ill run
get 145 more posts and we may just consider you
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:04 pm
diddle wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:ill run
get 145 more posts and we may just consider you
The lowest amount of posts by a candidate is 777.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:04 pm
sorry minister i dont think you would win against such experienced spamiknightsunriggable wrote:diddle wrote:and get rid of minister whateverhisnameis, he hasn't even proven himself to be a worthy knight yet, he needs to be a more accomplished member to try out for this coveted role
Who agrees with this? I'll take him off the list unless there's overwhelming objection.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:05 pm
who is that?unriggable wrote:diddle wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:ill run
get 145 more posts and we may just consider you
The lowest amount of posts by a candidate is 777.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:06 pm
duday53 wrote:who is that?unriggable wrote:diddle wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:ill run
get 145 more posts and we may just consider you
The lowest amount of posts by a candidate is 777.
Firth4eva
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:09 pm
duday53 wrote:sorry minister i dont think you would win against such experienced spamiknightsunriggable wrote:diddle wrote:and get rid of minister whateverhisnameis, he hasn't even proven himself to be a worthy knight yet, he needs to be a more accomplished member to try out for this coveted role
Who agrees with this? I'll take him off the list unless there's overwhelming objection.
A little trust can go a long way. I won't be too fussed if I'm stricken off the list...it's just that..well....I just want to be LOVED!!
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:10 pm
wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:13 pm
i replaced my 600 a long time agodiddle wrote:wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:15 pm
diddle wrote:wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
Nice...I'd have some 200 more posts if I wasn't banned for posting that link a while back.
I have an idea. Each knight that isn't running has three votes worth one point each. Hecter has three votes, worth five points each. Each person can only vote for each person once, so hecter can't vote three time for diddle for example.
Sound good? I think we should elect this way.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:22 pm
unriggable wrote:diddle wrote:wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
Nice...I'd have some 200 more posts if I wasn't banned for posting that link a while back.
I have an idea. Each knight that isn't running has three votes worth one point each. Hecter has three votes, worth five points each. Each person can only vote for each person once, so hecter can't vote three time for diddle for example.
Sound good? I think we should elect this way.
I agree, because it's the only idea we have.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:23 pm
Minister Masket wrote:unriggable wrote:diddle wrote:wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
Nice...I'd have some 200 more posts if I wasn't banned for posting that link a while back.
I have an idea. Each knight that isn't running has three votes worth one point each. Hecter has three votes, worth five points each. Each person can only vote for each person once, so hecter can't vote three time for diddle for example.
Sound good? I think we should elect this way.
I agree, because it's the only idea we have.
Somebody pitch an idea.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:25 pm
I'm out, see you guys later.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:29 pm
777 is a lucky number.
yay.
time to delete anothe post to keep it at 777
yay.
time to delete anothe post to keep it at 777
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:34 pm
Hey guys, what did Iliad do to get banned? Anyone know?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:38 pm
when was he banned?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:38 pm
Seems today, I just heard about it in a mafia game I'm in.