Mods: an appeal

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Mods: an appeal

Post by pimpdave »

bedub1 wrote:I posted a topic. Some people thought it had porn. James Vazquez cleared it. Then Jennifer Marie locked it. Inconsistency....



Well whatever it was, it was absolutely NSFW, and I think I speak for everyone when I ask you to ALWAYS fault on the side of putting up such a warning.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
mandalorian2298
Posts: 4536
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:57 pm
Gender: Male
Location: www.chess.com

Re: Mods: an appeal

Post by mandalorian2298 »

You guys are all operating under a delusion that the actions of the Mods are based on logic and common sense. Click here and read Twill's PM if you wish to rid yourself of that delusion. ;)
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.

Image

Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
bedub1
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:41 am
Gender: Male

Re: Mods: an appeal

Post by bedub1 »

pimpdave wrote:
bedub1 wrote:I posted a topic. Some people thought it had porn. James Vazquez cleared it. Then Jennifer Marie locked it. Inconsistency....



Well whatever it was, it was absolutely NSFW, and I think I speak for everyone when I ask you to ALWAYS fault on the side of putting up such a warning.

Yeah I really needed that NSFW. My bad. Sorry.
User avatar
cena-rules
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Chat

Re: Mods: an appeal

Post by cena-rules »

bedub1 wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
bedub1 wrote:I posted a topic. Some people thought it had porn. James Vazquez cleared it. Then Jennifer Marie locked it. Inconsistency....



Well whatever it was, it was absolutely NSFW, and I think I speak for everyone when I ask you to ALWAYS fault on the side of putting up such a warning.

Yeah I really needed that NSFW. My bad. Sorry.


IT HAD A NAKED 14YO IN IT
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Mods: an appeal

Post by Frigidus »

cena-rules wrote:
bedub1 wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
bedub1 wrote:I posted a topic. Some people thought it had porn. James Vazquez cleared it. Then Jennifer Marie locked it. Inconsistency....



Well whatever it was, it was absolutely NSFW, and I think I speak for everyone when I ask you to ALWAYS fault on the side of putting up such a warning.

Yeah I really needed that NSFW. My bad. Sorry.


IT HAD A NAKED 14YO IN IT


:o :o :o :o
























=P~
bedub1
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:41 am
Gender: Male

Re: Mods: an appeal

Post by bedub1 »

cena-rules wrote:
bedub1 wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
bedub1 wrote:I posted a topic. Some people thought it had porn. James Vazquez cleared it. Then Jennifer Marie locked it. Inconsistency....



Well whatever it was, it was absolutely NSFW, and I think I speak for everyone when I ask you to ALWAYS fault on the side of putting up such a warning.

Yeah I really needed that NSFW. My bad. Sorry.


IT HAD A NAKED 14YO IN IT

no it didn't. It's a satire piece. Her name is "Lucy MountJoy"...do you get it? It's supposed to be about parents buying their kids this broom, which vibrates, inappropriately...so they have to claim she's young for the picture. It's from a UK site...what are the rules there?
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”