Conquer Club

yeah, good point, that would work too

I posted this in suggestion, but guess could go here too on asking cc community what they think


adding platinum and diamond status


currently bronze is 20 wins, silver 100, gold 400

my suggestion would be this:

bronze 20

silver 100

gold 300

platinum 500

diamond 1000


other medals


chained games
fog of war
unlimited
victory achievement for consecutive wins in a row
freestyle
adjacent
score
flat rate
map makers
escalating
medals for wins on all maps

example beating 20 unique opponents on brazil map bronze, 100 opponents silver, 300 gold, 500 wins platinum, 1000 opponents diamond, this would happen for every single map, would create more playability + versatility






I guess this list is final? no other suggestions?

I would like to see medals based on win percentage, compared to number of players in game. This would actually show skill. Anybody can win 20 games if they play 1000 of them. Also would be nice to have medals that not only have win percentage, but average rank of opponents.

It might look like this

medal for 20% wins in 6 player with average opponents score of 2,000.

Something like that, could have gold medal for 25% and 2200 or something.

Georgerx7di wrote:I would like to see medals based on win percentage, compared to number of players in game. This would actually show skill. Anybody can win 20 games if they play 1000 of them. Also would be nice to have medals that not only have win percentage, but average rank of opponents.

It might look like this

medal for 20% wins in 6 player with average opponents score of 2,000.

Something like that, could have gold medal for 25% and 2200 or something.

I suggest a medal for the guy who programs that

Blitzaholic wrote:I personally like the platinum and diamond status but make them much more difficult to reach so it is a rarity, this way most would not have them, unless they truly dedicated to cc or played a ton, loyalty.

Wait isn't this the same as to those players who actually don't have a life except CC?

negoeien wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:I personally like the platinum and diamond status but make them much more difficult to reach so it is a rarity, this way most would not have them, unless they truly dedicated to cc or played a ton, loyalty.

Wait isn't this the same as to those players who actually don't have a life except CC?

Hey not true...

AAFitz wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:I would like to see medals based on win percentage, compared to number of players in game. This would actually show skill. Anybody can win 20 games if they play 1000 of them. Also would be nice to have medals that not only have win percentage, but average rank of opponents.

It might look like this

medal for 20% wins in 6 player with average opponents score of 2,000.

Something like that, could have gold medal for 25% and 2200 or something.

I suggest a medal for the guy who programs that

Speaking of which, I think programmers like Chip, Yeti and Ed ( although most players would rather see him crucified) deserve recognition like a special achievement award or something along those lines. I do realize there are more out there that have written scripts in CC's infancy stage- like Daniel's dice analyzer, Troy and many more that I can't think of right now.

Scott-Land wrote:

AAFitz wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:I would like to see medals based on win percentage, compared to number of players in game. This would actually show skill. Anybody can win 20 games if they play 1000 of them. Also would be nice to have medals that not only have win percentage, but average rank of opponents.

It might look like this

medal for 20% wins in 6 player with average opponents score of 2,000, would need to include teams as well.

Something like that, could have gold medal for 25% and 2200 or something.

I suggest a medal for the guy who programs that

Speaking of which, I think programmers like Chip, Yeti and Ed ( although most players would rather see him crucified) deserve recognition like a special achievement award or something along those lines. I do realize there are more out there that have written scripts in CC's infancy stage- like Daniel's dice analyzer, Troy and many more that I can't think of right now.

agreed-I will title it programmers

score

diamond 5000 score
platinum 4000 score
gold 3000 score
silver 2000 score
bronze 1500 score

this would mean if a cc player ever reached this high they would receive this medal even if there score is currently below it now to show that at least one time they were there and is a good milestone.


of course if cc does not add platinum and diamond status, I would suggest this

gold 4000 score
silver 3000 score
bronze 2000 score

Keep current ranks where they are ... at least for now. Too soon to change.

HOWEVER, I DO think some higher ranks would be nice. I see a lot of gold out there, and this system has only been in place a short while. It would take nothing away from current achievements, but would add more.


SO

LIKE:

New levels -- platinum, diamond ... maybe emerald or such, too?


Badges Plain for everyone with the highest score they reached.

Bronze for the top 100
Silver for the top 20
Gold for the top 10 (conquerer already exists for #1)

If platinum and such are added, then I would bump the ranks down

Bronze for top 500, silver for top 100 gold for top 50, platinum for top 25, diamond for top 10 (if emerald added, that would be top 5).

OTHER awards you have to work to keep ---

"all maps" would be for someone who wins on ALL the maps ... every time new maps instituted, they would have 30 days to win in them if they want to keep the badge (gives folks another reason to stay active in CC, without heavily penalizing those who don't -- you can always start back up and win in whatever maps have been introduced while you were gone)


Separate multiple player and single map achievement awards. It takes longer, is harder to win 5 games with multiple players. I feel this should be recognized. Perhaps this should happen for speed games, too?

good points there player

i like it

THE ARMY wrote:i like it

yep, sounds good


when is the update for the medals?

sigh

I need more medals to try for

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I don't know if anyone said this yet. It would be cool to have a medal for those who have been conqueror in the past.

Blitzaholic wrote:I posted this in suggestion, but guess could go here too on asking cc community what they think


adding platinum and diamond status


currently bronze is 20 wins, silver 100, gold 400

my suggestion would be this:

bronze 20

silver 100

gold 300

platinum 500

diamond 1000


other medals


chained games
fog of war
unlimited
victory achievement for consecutive wins in a row
freestyle
adjacent
score
flat rate
map makers
escalating
programmers
all maps
individual map

example beating 20 unique opponents on brazil map bronze, 100 opponents silver, 300 gold, 500 wins platinum, 1000 opponents diamond, this would happen for every single map, would create more playability + versatility

how are we going to differ platinium from silver at the first look ? we can not test or bring the medal to some expert if it is platinium or silver. As far as i know they all are very light grey, or am i wrong ?

Georgerx7di wrote:I don't know if anyone said this yet. It would be cool to have a medal for those who have been conqueror in the past.

excellent idea...what other medals can you give me ?

HardAttack wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:I posted this in suggestion, but guess could go here too on asking cc community what they think


adding platinum and diamond status


currently bronze is 20 wins, silver 100, gold 400

my suggestion would be this:

bronze 20

silver 100

gold 300

platinum 500

diamond 1000


other medals


chained games
fog of war
unlimited
victory achievement for consecutive wins in a row
freestyle
adjacent
score
flat rate
map makers
escalating
programmers
all maps
individual map

example beating 20 unique opponents on brazil map bronze, 100 opponents silver, 300 gold, 500 wins platinum, 1000 opponents diamond, this would happen for every single map, would create more playability + versatility

how are we going to differ platinium from silver at the first look ? we can not test or bring the medal to some expert if it is platinium or silver. As far as i know they all are very light grey, or am i wrong ?

they could use a different shade of it.

Georgerx7di wrote:I don't know if anyone said this yet. It would be cool to have a medal for those who have been conqueror in the past.

I will add it to the list, thx george, good idea

Blitzaholic wrote:I posted this in suggestion, but guess could go here too on asking cc community what they think


adding platinum and diamond status


currently bronze is 20 wins, silver 100, gold 400

my suggestion would be this:

bronze 20

silver 100

gold 300

platinum 500

diamond 1000


other medals


chained games
fog of war
unlimited
victory achievement for consecutive wins in a row
freestyle
adjacent
score
flat rate
map makers
escalating
programmers
all maps
individual map
conqueror

example beating 20 unique opponents on brazil map bronze, 100 opponents silver, 300 gold, 500 wins platinum, 1000 opponents diamond, this would happen for every single map, would create more playability + versatility

any other ideas? all highlighted in blue may go in effect

edited

I posted this in suggestion, but guess could go here too on asking cc community what they think


adding platinum and diamond status


currently bronze is 20 wins, silver 100, gold 400

my suggestion would be this:

bronze 20

silver 100

gold 300

platinum 500

diamond 1000


other medals


chained: 20 games bronze, etc.
fog of warL 20 games bronze, etc.
unlimited: 20 games bronze, etc
victory achievement for consecutive wins in a row: 5 bronze, 10 silver, 20 gold, 30 platinum, 50 diamond
sequential: 20 games bronze, etc
freestyle: 20 games bronze, etc
adjacent 20 games bronz,e etc.
score 1000 bronze, 2000 silver, 3000 gold, 4000 platinum, 5000 diamond-even if they lower now, if they ever got there, it would count
flat rate: 20 games bronze, etc
map makers
escalating: 20 games, bronze, etc.
programmers
all maps played : 10 maps bronze, 25 maps silver, 50 maps gold, 75 maps platinum, 100 maps diamond
individual map: 10 wins on a map bronze, 25 wins on a map silver, 50 wins-gold, 75 platinum, 100 diamond
conqueror: if you ever hit this before regardless if you have it now, would be a special medal recognition
hall of fame: if a committee comes together and votes in players with lacks approval, this also would be special medal

others?

and will any of these be updated before the holidays or waiting til 2009?

i like all these ideas alot but i would change the conquerer medal to a high score medal-eg: 1200 for bronze up to 4500 for platinum,that way most everyone can get a medal for that catagory and not limited to the past conquerers that are still playing..i think there are 8 but not sure.

i love this idea
especially the wins in a row medal

Jeff Hardy wrote:i love this idea
especially the wins in a row medal

what would you set the bronze at..up to platinum? and would it be games won in a row or players beaten in a row?