Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:54 am
WidowMakers wrote:
2) I made the text in the legend feel more like a LCD panel and LCD.
a very nice touch. but it's LED not LCD
a very nice touch. but it's LED not LCD
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/
RAIL USA [Quenched]
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=23064
Page 8 of 17
a very nice touch. but it's LED not LCD
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:24 am
DiM wrote:WidowMakers wrote:
2) I made the text in the legend feel more like a LCD panel and LCD.
a very nice touch. but it's LED not LCD
I thought it was LSD, perhaps I'm thinking of something else.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:43 am
I'm not keen on the textured area either side of the title. Also, the background could maybe be darkened a touch... not too much, just a little bit.
Everything else is looking excellent though, the legend update is great.
Everything else is looking excellent though, the legend update is great.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:57 am
Chicago needs to be with the rest of the bonuses.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:22 pm
WM....thanks for the head on the butterfly....i feel whole again now! 
The legend board looks great. Very impressive. Is has a very artdeco feel about it.
I agree with Keyogi that the background needs to be darkened...there is still too much light drawing my eyes away from the map itself.
And that Chicago station bonus is kewl where it is.
Excellent work.
The legend board looks great. Very impressive. Is has a very artdeco feel about it.
I agree with Keyogi that the background needs to be darkened...there is still too much light drawing my eyes away from the map itself.
And that Chicago station bonus is kewl where it is.
Excellent work.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:23 pm
cairnswk wrote:And that Chicago station bonus is perfect where it is.
Just so it doesn't look like cairnswk & WidowMakers vs world on that point. I also agree.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:27 pm
Current Version
WidowMakers wrote:VERSION 14
Here are the updates.
1) I changed the order of the names in the legend to correspond to the layout of the map (thanks onbekende)
2) I made the text in the legend feel more like a LCD panel and LCD.
3) The underlined 3 letters of the service line was hard to make look good on the new legend so I edited the text to say "First three letters" Instead of "3 underlined letters"
4) Fixed CairnsWK sig so the butterfly has a head
NOTE: I know there are some stray blue glows behind the map. I will fix this next time.
Awesome
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:42 pm
Looking Good... I only wish it was a little easier to see the country Border...also when i look close i can see very little texture in the map - Kind of wish i saw more... Not a big deal at all though Great Job guys
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:42 pm
Regarding the Chicago Bonus placement, I think it is alright in its current spot, as it is located near the other main legend.
Though it might look interesting if it was hanging from the top legend, similar to how one of the names was a few updates ago, there might not be ample room there though.
--Andy
Though it might look interesting if it was hanging from the top legend, similar to how one of the names was a few updates ago, there might not be ample room there though.
--Andy
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:34 pm
you should put the Chicago Bonus Icon on the bottom .. Right under Crescent On top of the legend but slightly hanging off of it
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:16 pm
I actually would rather have the Chicago bonus in the legend with LCD text rather than how it is now.Keredrex wrote:you should put the Chicago Bonus Icon on the bottom .. Right under Crescent On top of the legend but slightly hanging off of it
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:22 pm
WidowMakers wrote:I actually would rather have the Chicago bonus in the legend with LCD text rather than how it is now.Keredrex wrote:you should put the Chicago Bonus Icon on the bottom .. Right under Crescent On top of the legend but slightly hanging off of it
Yeah, it doesn't make sense to have all the bonuses except one at the top, and just Chicago by itself.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:22 pm
VERSION 15
OK Here goes. I like B
A
B
C
OK Here goes. I like B
A
B
C
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:06 pm
I actually really like C. It brings out the lighting in the title really well. So my preference is in reverse alphabetical.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:25 pm
I'd like something between B and C. In C it is very hard to see the florida area clearly.
Easy
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:51 pm
This is easy... I say C But put in a Thin Lighter Outline for the Country... Maybe even a lighter drop shadow... almost like there is a light behind the Sign that is shaped like the US you know
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:36 pm
C, and I'm not sure I would change a thing about the effect beyond that.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:47 pm
B by far (the contrast is perfect)
C feels WAY too dark
(I could be convinced an inbetween would be good, but C I don't like)
question: How will the stations like PDX, SAC, SLC and OMA show up in the XML?
they are unique in that they share two service lines but only have 1 station
I guess breaking the mold and calling it PDX might make sense. just wondering if it will be something like PDX COA/PIO . that looks weird how I did it but just curious
C feels WAY too dark
(I could be convinced an inbetween would be good, but C I don't like)
question: How will the stations like PDX, SAC, SLC and OMA show up in the XML?
they are unique in that they share two service lines but only have 1 station
I guess breaking the mold and calling it PDX might make sense. just wondering if it will be something like PDX COA/PIO . that looks weird how I did it but just curious
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:45 pm
I guess a lot of peoples reaction is going to be dependant on their monitor settings. I have no problems with seeing anything clearly. It couldn't be more clear for me in the C. option, but I can see how it might be cause for concern for others.
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:06 am
WM...my choice is for somewhere between B & C.
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:46 am
yep somewhere between B and C but more towards B
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:13 am
I have gone in between B and C. I hope everyone is happy. I too liked B more than C but this version is OK too. I just think C was too dark.edbeard wrote:B by far (the contrast is perfect)
C feels WAY too dark
(I could be convinced an inbetween would be good, but C I don't like)
Based on this issue, I moved the text around in the station area. It now reads the station letters then the service letters. CairnsWK will need to talk about this (he has all of the XML done, he just needs coordinates). He might have figured out a better way to express them.edbeard wrote:question: How will the stations like PDX, SAC, SLC and OMA show up in the XML?
they are unique in that they share two service lines but only have 1 station
I guess breaking the mold and calling it PDX might make sense. just wondering if it will be something like PDX COA/PIO . that looks weird how I did it but just curious
VERSION 16
I there are no more problems on this I can make the large version next.
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:29 am
just under the ELP station there is a bit of the background which looks like part of the outer glow and there is a light spot under the sas station can htese be taken out as there making the area look a little untidy.
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:31 am
Those just happen to be in the background. I can remove them if it is found to be an issue.gimil wrote:just under the ELP station there is a bit of the background which looks like part of the outer glow and there is a light spot under the sas station can htese be taken out as there making the area look a little untidy.
Thanks
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:34 am
edbeard wrote:B by far (the contrast is perfect)
C feels WAY too dark
(I could be convinced an inbetween would be good, but C I don't like)
question: How will the stations like PDX, SAC, SLC and OMA show up in the XML?
they are unique in that they share two service lines but only have 1 station
I guess breaking the mold and calling it PDX might make sense. just wondering if it will be something like PDX COA/PIO . that looks weird how I did it but just curious
edbeard....i had answered the xml question back on about P8 or 9 on 16 July.
Below is that post, and it hasn't changed, i am simply awaiting the final posting of coordinates for the small map and then the large and I'll be able to do the army shadows.
cairnswk wrote:Have at look at this XML below for NOL....you'll see that New Orleans is identified by
1. NOL New Orleans CIT (CIT is the yellow service)
2. NOL New Orleans SUN (SUN is the tan service)
3. NOL New Orleans CRE (CRE is the light blue service)
<country>
<name>NOL New Orleans CIT</name>
<borders>
<border>SAS San Antonio SUN</border>
<border>SAS San Antonio TEX</border>
<border>MEM Memphis CIT</border>
<border>ATL Atlanta CRE</border>
<border>ORL Orlando SUN</border>
<border>ORL Orlando SIL</border>
<border>NOL New Orleans SUN</border>
<border>NOL New Orleans CRE</border>
</borders>
<coordinates>
<smallx>348</smallx>
<smally>429</smally>
<largex>450</largex>
<largey>547</largey>
</coordinates>
</country>