Conquer Club

Posted: **Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:52 pm**

Thanks Mike, I am just checking in out of lack of anything else to do. I will probably get to this myself later in the week but we will see. I had Incandenza and Dako lined up to receive the PMs and help out with this one.

Posted: **Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:11 pm**

Chuuuck, when would you like these rankings back? We are discussing in our forum and will probably be a couple more days?

Posted: **Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:24 pm**

I was going to give another week or so and then probably start harassing everyone with PMs who hasn't sent them in yet.

Posted: **Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:01 pm**

Thanks, another week would be good. I'd like to get everyone in the clan to submit his own list and from that I can then send you an aggregate of all the votes. This will be far more representative than just my own opinion, but of course it takes a little longer.

Posted: **Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:45 pm**

any updates on this?

Posted: **Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:48 pm**

I have plenty of votes and started to compile them, but I would like more votes. I am going to bug a few people over PM and probably put this out next week.

Posted: **Sun Dec 26, 2010 5:20 am**

"blitzaholic
I help use chuuuucks efforts into my thread bones. His work is very helpful and much more respected then jp's ladder."

realy? How you know which work its helpfull and more respected? I hope that you realised,how these its not sound good.
Bouth doing good jobs here in CC, and personaly i think that jpcloet have very large job,then chuuuk, but i can not say who are more respected.

Posted: **Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:41 pm**

qwert wrote:"blitzaholic
I help use chuuuucks efforts into my thread bones. His work is very helpful and much more respected then jp's ladder."

realy? How you know which work its helpfull and more respected? I hope that you realised,how these its not sound good.
Bouth doing good jobs here in CC, and personaly i think that jpcloet have very large job,then chuuuk, but i can not say who are more respected.

I think what Blitz was trying to say is that because Chuck's list is compiled using the votes of all clans, it is perceived as more accurate than a formula that has been used in the past. Hopefully we get the Leap system going soon and we will have the most accurate yet.

Posted: **Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:12 pm**

Rather interesting how all of this will pan out eventually when the information goes through. (Yes, fine, that's a bit more sophisticated way of saying bump :oops:

)

Posted: **Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:23 am**

How soon are these results expected to be posted?

---C

Posted: **Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:20 pm**

Haha, thanks for the modest "bumps." I have gotten a few PMs to. I have just been busy and haven't been checking all of the forums lately as much as regular. I am hoping to have a posted power rankings by the end of this work week.

Posted: **Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:06 pm**

Chuuuuck wrote:Haha, thanks for the modest "bumps." I have gotten a few PMs to. I have just been busy and haven't been checking all of the forums lately as much as regular. I am hoping to have a posted power rankings by the end of this work week.

The end of which work week? :-^

Posted: **Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:21 pm**

Eyestone wrote:
Chuuuuck wrote:Haha, thanks for the modest "bumps." I have gotten a few PMs to. I have just been busy and haven't been checking all of the forums lately as much as regular. I am hoping to have a posted power rankings by the end of this work week.

The end of which work week?

If you read it, it's the end of THIS work week. Now he can never be late. :lol:

Posted: **Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:54 am**

TheMissionary wrote:
Eyestone wrote:
Chuuuuck wrote:Haha, thanks for the modest "bumps." I have gotten a few PMs to. I have just been busy and haven't been checking all of the forums lately as much as regular. I am hoping to have a posted power rankings by the end of this work week.

The end of which work week?

If you read it, it's the end of THIS work week. Now he can never be late.

unless he is back in the mexican jail.

:shock:

Posted: **Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:26 pm**

Don't Inc and CoF has access to the results to post them, or are they waiting for Chuck to do it because it's kind of his "thing?"

Posted: **Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:24 pm**

Ok how many work weeks have past now lol

Posted: **Wed Jan 26, 2011 4:32 pm**

I'm not involved in it anymore. See...it all falls apart

Posted: **Wed Jan 26, 2011 4:49 pm**

Master Fenrir wrote:Don't Inc and CoF has access to the results to post them, or are they waiting for Chuck to do it because it's kind of his "thing?"

I'm just a second pair of eyes, this is Chuck's ballgame.

Posted: **Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:30 am**

I am curious to see what happens here.

Posted: **Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:54 pm**

Maybe CC exceeded the power of the rankings?

Posted: **Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:18 pm**

Sorry, all, the nature of my business I just get really busy at times and less busy at other times. I have been busy lately and when that happens I usually check games/forums quickly but am a little more slow to update.

Anyway, I started to compile and have decided I am going to ask for votes again. Many of the votes I got were not complete in the manner I need them and on top of that I only received 14 votes which is less than I received the last time around.

A lot of clans are now signing up for Conqueror's Cup 2 that were not in the first one and I think they will now have an interest in completing these votes which they did not have the interest before. So I will try to get more votes.

For the votes that I got, I will quote those PMs back to their senders so they can update them and send them again and it will be minimal work for them. I will ask the ones that didn't complete their votes to fix them so that all votes are uniform and easy to put together for the data needed.

I promise to have these compiled as soon as I get more votes flowing in. I am going to put a deadline of 1 week from today on receiving votes and I will probably hound the leaders every day for the votes.

Posted: **Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:29 pm**

Nice one Chuck. We actually held back from submitting our list until such time as you seemed ready, as circumstances change. I also got all the good folks in TOFU to send in their rankings (to our forum) so the list you get from us will be a composite affair that is far more representative of a collective thought rather than just one person's opinion (a problem I had with Blitz's system which was by closed ballot to select individuals).

Just a thought, but you could make admission to the Cup dependent on satisfactory submission of a list. If a clan has the ability to compete in a tourney such as this then it should have the nous to identify clan hierarchy.

Posted: **Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:34 pm**

Chariot of Fire wrote:Just a thought, but you could make admission to the Cup dependent on satisfactory submission of a list. If a clan has the ability to compete in a tourney such as this then it should have the nous to identify clan hierarchy.

Great suggestion Simon, I think I will do this.

Posted: **Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:54 pm**

Chuuuuck wrote:
Chariot of Fire wrote:Just a thought, but you could make admission to the Cup dependent on satisfactory submission of a list. If a clan has the ability to compete in a tourney such as this then it should have the nous to identify clan hierarchy.

Great suggestion Simon, I think I will do this.

i wish i could like this like facebook

Posted: **Fri Feb 04, 2011 1:19 pm**

lord voldemort wrote:
Chuuuuck wrote:
Chariot of Fire wrote:Just a thought, but you could make admission to the Cup dependent on satisfactory submission of a list. If a clan has the ability to compete in a tourney such as this then it should have the nous to identify clan hierarchy.

Great suggestion Simon, I think I will do this.

i wish i could like this like facebook

Conquer Club

Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings