Page 64 of 208
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:39 am
by Blitzaholic
most rounds
doing top 5
currently this is the info i have and will update later
470183 rounds 479
109511 rounds ended 400
288082 rounds ended 390
205842 rounds ended 334
45500 rounds ended 333
59230 rounds 321
268332 rounds 306
90419 rounds 371
103227 rounds 300
249959 rounds 297
704071 rounds 287
187179 rounds 267
746010 rounds 221
175704 rounds 236
315900 rounds 220
320963 rounds 211
150052 rounds 271
183512 rounds 255
207959 rounds 222
320960 rounds 205
255573 rounds 197
if i missed any let me know or post in here, ty
again only doing top 5, but any games over 200 rounds may last into top 5
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:40 am
by Blitzaholic
Robinette wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:jr, 315 positive feedbacks?
10 more in one day
stop being so nice to people
go back to your old ways
316
I was always a nice guy 
nice (nīs)
adj. nic·er, nic·est
1. Pleasing and agreeable in nature: had a nice time.
2. Having a pleasant or attractive appearance: a nice dress; a nice face.
3. Exhibiting courtesy and politeness: a nice gesture.
4. Of good character and reputation; respectable.
5. Overdelicate or fastidious; fussy.
6. Showing or requiring great precision or sensitive discernment; subtle: a nice distinction; a nice sense of style.
7. Done with delicacy and skill: a nice bit of craft.
8. Used as an intensive with and: nice and warm.
mis·un·der·stood /ˌmɪsʌndərˈstʊd/ Pronunciation[mis-uhn-der-stood]
–adjective
1. improperly understood or interpreted.
2. unappreciated.
–verb (used with object), -stood, -stand·ing.
1. to take (words, statements, etc.) in a wrong sense; understand wrongly.
2. to fail to understand or interpret rightly the words or behavior of.
well done robinette
jr 325 now? holy cow
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:56 am
by AAFitz
update
game round
268332 365
187179 302
175704 251
320963 250
320960 234
255573 213
491902 211
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:43 am
by Scott-Land
Poo-Maker should be on Top 5 to reach 3.5K ( not sure how many times or how it qualifies) and also Top 5 ranks-singles ( either #2 or #3)
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:11 am
by comic boy
Scott-Land wrote:Poo-Maker should be on Top 5 to reach 3.5K ( not sure how many times or how it qualifies) and also Top 5 ranks-singles ( either #2 or #3)
Poo definitely one of the top singles players but 46% win rate excludes him from this list of singles players.
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:23 am
by Scott-Land
Comic- the two i'm speaking of are Top 5 reaching 3.5k x amount of times and 5 top singles rank- players actually holding #3 rank or better on the scoreboard. EDIT: Pretty sure Poo held #2 rank and positive he held #3. Unless all those categories are all under 40- then you are correct.
there's a separate category for Top 5 under 40%........
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:28 am
by Blitzaholic
Scott-Land wrote:Comic- the two i'm speaking of are Top 5 reaching 3.5k x amount of times and 5 top singles rank- players actually holding #3 rank or better on the scoreboard.
there's a separate category for Top 5 under 40%........
scott is right about poo for reaching 3.5K, i think he only did it once, if he does it again, he will get 2x
top 5 singles rank, means a singles player that had been #1, #2 or #3 on the scoreboard, has he been 1,2,3 on the scoreboard? I may have missed it.
ty scott for the help, appreciate it, poo is about to win a singles game that we played for many months, ugh lol
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:31 am
by poo-maker
Blitzaholic wrote:scott is right about poo for reaching 3.5K, i think he only did it once, if he does it again, he will get 2x
top 5 singles rank, means a singles player that had been #1, #2 or #3 on the scoreboard, has he been 1,2,3 on the scoreboard? I may have missed it.
You're right, i only made it over 3500 once.
I got to 2nd place though, with SkyT above me in 1st and comic boy in 3rd.
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:34 am
by poo-maker
Blitzaholic wrote:ty scott for the help, appreciate it, poo is about to win a singles game that we played for many months, ugh lol
I'm only in the lead because of sheer luck... I won a 83-80 with 30 left to spare...
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:55 am
by comic boy
Scott-Land wrote:Comic- the two i'm speaking of are Top 5 reaching 3.5k x amount of times and 5 top singles rank- players actually holding #3 rank or better on the scoreboard. EDIT: Pretty sure Poo held #2 rank and positive he held #3. Unless all those categories are all under 40- then you are correct.
there's a separate category for Top 5 under 40%........
LOL Scott all these Blitz lists confuse the hell out of me
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:41 am
by happy2seeyou
Game 663689
Round 354
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:43 am
by Blitzaholic
poo-maker wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:scott is right about poo for reaching 3.5K, i think he only did it once, if he does it again, he will get 2x
top 5 singles rank, means a singles player that had been #1, #2 or #3 on the scoreboard, has he been 1,2,3 on the scoreboard? I may have missed it.
You're right, i only made it over 3500 once.
I got to 2nd place though, with SkyT above me in 1st and comic boy in 3rd.
ok, updated
you just knocked off my good friend martin from the list, grrrrr
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:43 am
by Blitzaholic
happy2seeyou wrote:Game 663689
Round 354
will update this later court
u and paul having a tiff
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:44 am
by happy2seeyou
nope, we were having fun teasing each other last night will tell you about it later.
In that game, we each have over 70,000 armies
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:46 am
by Blitzaholic
happy2seeyou wrote:nope, we were having fun teasing each other last night will tell you about it later.
In that game, we each have over 70,000 armies
ok
will update top 5 rounds shortly
armies counts on lands, i am also considering
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:48 am
by Blitzaholic
Blitzaholic wrote:jr, 315 positive feedbacks?
10 more in one day
345
30 more the next day
what are you doing to these players
1st one to 400 feedbacks jr or clapper? race is on
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:07 pm
by firstholliday
actually i think he should be excluded from this list. (JR)
1. he cheats in freestyle.
2. All his games are against luits or lower. All high ranks are on his ignore list.
He will say anyone can join my games. But he will drop if he suspects bad play.
Just a tosser in my humble opinion.
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:18 pm
by Gilligan
What about the longest/shortest tournaments, and the tournaments with the most/least games?
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:29 pm
by Blitzaholic
firstholliday wrote:actually i think he should be excluded from this list. (JR)
1. he cheats in freestyle.
2. All his games are against luits or lower. All high ranks are on his ignore list.
He will say anyone can join my games. But he will drop if he suspects bad play.
Just a tosser in my humble opinion.
ouch-pretty harsh
u and jr have a tiff?
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:30 pm
by Blitzaholic
Gilligan wrote:What about the longest/shortest tournaments, and the tournaments with the most/least games?
good suggestions gilligan
will need to think about this, you have any info on some of this?
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:31 pm
by Blitzaholic
Not sure any one has ever done this, well maybe 1 or 2, not sure
1st 5 to 3K score and 3K posts
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
something to shoot for maybe in the future?
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:42 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
firstholliday wrote:actually i think he should be excluded from this list. (JR)
1. he cheats in freestyle.
2. All his games are against luits or lower. All high ranks are on his ignore list.
He will say anyone can join my games. But he will drop if he suspects bad play.
Just a tosser in my humble opinion.
346 players seem to disagree with you and because of you telling everyone to leave me negative feedback is the only reason why I have 15. you sat there and monitered over 1,000 1 vs 1 games that I played ( about 6,000 turns) and than when I doubled up ( about 20 turns ) you PM'd the player telling them to leave me feedback. Did you PM all the players that played the same tactic vs me? than you got balls to leave me negative feedback that I did this to you and we never even played a 1 vs 1 or freestyle game. talk about abusing the system. I had to get the feedback removed.
now can anyone figure out why this player is on my ignore list? Oh let me guess... because he beat me once or twice. right ?
so I should not be included on any top 5's because of this "tosser" is on my ignore list
good fight noob
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:29 am
by David_Wain
And I made ur ignore list because??
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:33 am
by Genghis Khan CA
David_Wain wrote:And I made ur ignore list because??
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:43 am
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Genghis Khan CA wrote:
Genghis Khan is not on my list