Page 7 of 7

Re: New World Order - Love's Got The World In Motion

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:40 pm
by xelabale
xelabale wrote:
TheProwler wrote:I'm just tired of this whole thread.

You started it under the guise of being genuinely interested in expanding your knowledge. But you've since proven that you are not open to any new ideas at all.

So who's the troll?

Okay, so elucidate why my analysis was incorrect

You are obviously unable as you have had several days. You need to carry the NWO burden alone now capn's gone. Do you actually have any ideas or were you simply tagging onto the lion's coattails?

Re: New World Order - Love's Got The World In Motion

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:55 pm
by InkL0sed
TheProwler wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:
TheProwler wrote:So a "fact" isn't necessarily a fact.

And that's a fact.


Only fact here is you're a long-winded troll that people take seriously way too often.

And you like sentences with line breaks.

At least when they're intended to be clever.

Ahhh, but you can't


prove it.


Only you can do that.







And stay on-topic. You've done nothing for this thread.


I don't intend to do anything for this thread.

Re: New World Order - Love's Got The World In Motion

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:44 pm
by TheProwler
xelabale wrote:
xelabale wrote:
TheProwler wrote:I'm just tired of this whole thread.

You started it under the guise of being genuinely interested in expanding your knowledge. But you've since proven that you are not open to any new ideas at all.

So who's the troll?

Okay, so elucidate why my analysis was incorrect

You are obviously unable as you have had several days. You need to carry the NWO burden alone now capn's gone. Do you actually have any ideas or were you simply tagging onto the lion's coattails?

Hahaha!

On what page did Capt.Crazy last post in this thread?

Page 3.

Your words are hollow. He's been ignoring you since Page 3. Didn't you understand these simple words?

TheProwler wrote:And capt.crazy and others that follow that stuff are not answering you. Maybe they feel you don't deserve to be educated.


Regarding your "analysis":

This was the crap you wrote:

xelabale wrote:So let me get this straight - they are positioning themselves to be in control after the catastrophes. They are doing this by:
  • Using fluoride in the water. This will help after the catastrophe by, er, keeping people's teeth strong thus they will spend time looking at themselves in the mirror instead of getting angry at the NWO elite who were in power before and are now in power again.
  • Contrails - these help by, er, poisoning us. But not them. They are immune.
  • Putting mercury in vaccines - this helps by, er, making people a bit mentally unstable, perfect for mind control purposes when the white teeth are no longer enough.
  • Purposely destroying the economy - this helps by, er, destroying their power base now so they can be even more incognito later I guess??
  • They will impose a world currency by April 2009. I mean they did. I mean they would've, I mean they should've, it says so in Isiah.. This would've helped by, er, making them rich now, which would have helped after the catastrophe by, er, well, don't worry about it it didn't happen anyway.

They are worried that being powerful enough to control who gets elected will not help them after the catastrophe. These guys should just chill and enjoy the power they have now.

A further question - what will they need to control the world post-society?


Do you seriously want me to address this crap?

First off, you try to be funny with childish sarcasm. Fail.

You are asking me to address fluoride, contrails, and mercury. I have never spoken on these subjects. If they are meant to control the weak-minded, then I think you should be more worried about them than me. Try Google.

Also, regarding April 2009 and world currency: Not something I ever talked about, genius. Do you seriously have such a hard time keeping track of other users? Your mistake must be that you think someone will choose a "side" and buy into all theories of that "side". I can think for myself. You should try it sometime too.

I already addressed and corrected you on your mistake about the economy:

TheProwler wrote:But keeping people weak in the present will generally prevent them from positioning themselves to be strong in the future. Also, when someone can't afford groceries for the week, they generally won't fight as hard to retain their right to keep and bear arms.

Do you not understand plain English? That is your answer. The poor economy is a distraction.

You are just an annoying dick who can't seem to comprehend other peoples' posts. How frustrating your life must be!!! You have a million questions and you can never understand the answers.

Maybe that's why Capt.Crazy was ignoring you. Hahahahahaha!!!!

Re: New World Order - Love's Got The World In Motion

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:36 pm
by Woodruff
Carebian Knight wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
TheProwler wrote:So a "fact" isn't necessarily a fact.
And that's a fact.


Duh, that's science. That's why, for instance, it's called the THEORY of gravity, not the FACT of gravity.

But there are some things that we can readily treat as actual facts.

Hell, nobody can even PROVE that the world isn't just a figment of their own imagination and nothing actually exists outside of their mind.


So you would agree that you can't say we're wrong since you can't prove anything DEFINITIVELY, including even the most basic "facts" of our world.


You're rapidly convincing me of the "fact" that you're a troll...

Re: New World Order - Love's Got The World In Motion

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:54 pm
by Carebian Knight
Woodruff wrote:
Carebian Knight wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
TheProwler wrote:So a "fact" isn't necessarily a fact.
And that's a fact.


Duh, that's science. That's why, for instance, it's called the THEORY of gravity, not the FACT of gravity.

But there are some things that we can readily treat as actual facts.

Hell, nobody can even PROVE that the world isn't just a figment of their own imagination and nothing actually exists outside of their mind.


So you would agree that you can't say we're wrong since you can't prove anything DEFINITIVELY, including even the most basic "facts" of our world.


You're rapidly convincing me of the "fact" that you're a troll...


:o =D> You figured me out :D

Not really though, I just enjoy making people think twice before posting what they've written. Usually by twisting words around, maybe I should be a lawyer :-k