Page 7 of 70
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:21 pm
by Koesen
Fircoal wrote:Koesen wrote:It's not so much about you doing anything wrong. It's about us trying to get our first bit of information, and you just happen to be the first target for reasons that are just as (ir)relevant as they would have been for other people.
I agree you haven't done anything yet, but if you refuse to claim when you're at -1 or -2, I just might think that's suspicious enough to add my vote.
On Day One, lack of evidence against you is not a defense.
I don't refuse to claim. But I'm at school right now. It's kinda hard. Can you guys wait until I get out at lunch?
I'll wait, but if you have the time to write this, you have the time to say: I'm Joe Schmo, Hider. Or something like that. With that many votes, I would have done that. 'Wait until lunch' sounds like you're working on a story.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:25 pm
by Koesen
Fircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:Fos Fircoal
How is it hard unless you have to manufacture a fake claim...
I can't remember my stupid role name, I went to do the stuff I have to and forgot. But I do know my role which is an actor.
Fastposted. What does an actor do, other than try to survive until his next lunch?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:27 pm
by Fircoal
Koesen wrote:Fircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:Fos Fircoal
How is it hard unless you have to manufacture a fake claim...
I can't remember my stupid role name, I went to do the stuff I have to and forgot. But I do know my role which is an actor.
Fastposted. What does an actor do, other than try to survive until his next lunch?
basically an actor make the last vote. that's it.
A stupid role really. >_>
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:29 pm
by Koesen
You mean you may only vote if it's the hammer?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:30 pm
by Fircoal
I c/ped my role Jack Langrishe.
now don't ask me anymore.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:30 pm
by Fircoal
Koesen wrote:You mean you may only vote if it's the hammer?
opposite way around.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:30 pm
by nagerous
Fircoal wrote:Russianfire8371 wrote:confirm and
vote Fir because this is one of the few times i actually can without the threat of Modkilling lurking above
MOdkill: Russian 
Vote: Russian, cause I'm a jerk like that.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:31 pm
by nagerous
Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:31 pm
by Clive
I believe him. I think there is an Actor in this game. Obviously if anyone else has that role claim now.
Get off his wagon guys...
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:33 pm
by Fircoal
nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
... it's true. I get the two roles confused. Then why didn't Gimpy warn me.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:33 pm
by Koesen
nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
I agree. I'm not sure whether this is enough of a scumtell to justify a vote, but you (Fircoal) are contradicting yourself.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:34 pm
by Fircoal
Koesen wrote:nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
I agree. I'm not sure whether this is enough of a scumtell to justify a vote, but you (Fircoal) are contradicting yourself.
fastposted
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:35 pm
by Clive
Koesen wrote:nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
I agree. I'm not sure whether this is enough of a scumtell to justify a vote, but you (Fircoal) are contradicting yourself.
Actor is an unimportant town role. If no-one counter's he's telling the truth.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:35 pm
by Koesen
Fircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
... it's true. I get the two roles confused. Then why didn't Gimpy warn me.
So what is it: you can only hammer or you can't hammer at all?
And how did you get the roles confused if you first said you can only make the last vote and then said you can't hammer? That doesn't sound like Gimpy's mistake but like yours.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:38 pm
by Anarkistsdream
So, you admit your role sucks, Fir... So don't mind us when we kill you.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:38 pm
by Koesen
Clive wrote:Koesen wrote:nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
I agree. I'm not sure whether this is enough of a scumtell to justify a vote, but you (Fircoal) are contradicting yourself.
Actor is an unimportant town role. If no-one counter's he's telling the truth.
I am, in spite of everything, inclined to believe Fircoal is telling the truth and his mistake doesn't mean much, but just because he's claiming an unimportant role doesn't mean he's telling the truth if not countered. An unimportant, rarely used role would make a pretty good fake claim.
You said you have reason to believe there is an actor in this game. Would you care to elaborate?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:39 pm
by Clive
Anarkistsdream wrote:So, you admit your role sucks, Fir... So don't mind us when we kill you.
...Are you scum?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:39 pm
by nagerous
Blah the roleclaim name makes sense. I suggest everyone unvotes though fir should have been warned for his vote earlier.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:40 pm
by Clive
Koesen wrote:Clive wrote:Koesen wrote:nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
I agree. I'm not sure whether this is enough of a scumtell to justify a vote, but you (Fircoal) are contradicting yourself.
Actor is an unimportant town role. If no-one counter's he's telling the truth.
I am, in spite of everything, inclined to believe Fircoal is telling the truth and his mistake doesn't mean much, but just because he's claiming an unimportant role doesn't mean he's telling the truth if not countered. An unimportant, rarely used role would make a pretty good fake claim.
You said you have reason to believe there is an actor in this game. Would you care to elaborate?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:42 pm
by Koesen
Koesen wrote: And how did you get the roles confused if you first said you can only make the last vote and then said you can't hammer? That doesn't sound like Gimpy's mistake but like yours.
Ah, I see I misunderstood you. You mean Gimpy should have warned you about your vote for whatshisname being illegal?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:48 pm
by Koesen
Clive wrote:
What's with the rolling eyes?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:59 pm
by nagerous
Turns out my 4000th post was here. Little celebration perhaps
.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:14 pm
by Koesen
nagerous wrote:Turns out my 4000th post was here. Little celebration perhaps
.
Good idea.
Unvote. Vote nagerous for a human bonfire!
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:16 pm
by Clive
Koesen wrote:nagerous wrote:Turns out my 4000th post was here. Little celebration perhaps
.
Good idea.
Unvote. Vote nagerous for a human bonfire!
I will always support a Nagerous lynch...
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:26 pm
by nagerous
Clive wrote:Koesen wrote:nagerous wrote:Turns out my 4000th post was here. Little celebration perhaps
.
Good idea.
Unvote. Vote nagerous for a human bonfire!
I will always support a Nagerous lynch...