Koesen wrote:It's not so much about you doing anything wrong. It's about us trying to get our first bit of information, and you just happen to be the first target for reasons that are just as (ir)relevant as they would have been for other people.
I agree you haven't done anything yet, but if you refuse to claim when you're at -1 or -2, I just might think that's suspicious enough to add my vote.
On Day One, lack of evidence against you is not a defense.
I don't refuse to claim. But I'm at school right now. It's kinda hard. Can you guys wait until I get out at lunch?
I'll wait, but if you have the time to write this, you have the time to say: I'm Joe Schmo, Hider. Or something like that. With that many votes, I would have done that. 'Wait until lunch' sounds like you're working on a story.
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
... it's true. I get the two roles confused. Then why didn't Gimpy warn me.
So what is it: you can only hammer or you can't hammer at all?
And how did you get the roles confused if you first said you can only make the last vote and then said you can't hammer? That doesn't sound like Gimpy's mistake but like yours.
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
I agree. I'm not sure whether this is enough of a scumtell to justify a vote, but you (Fircoal) are contradicting yourself.
Actor is an unimportant town role. If no-one counter's he's telling the truth.
I am, in spite of everything, inclined to believe Fircoal is telling the truth and his mistake doesn't mean much, but just because he's claiming an unimportant role doesn't mean he's telling the truth if not countered. An unimportant, rarely used role would make a pretty good fake claim.
You said you have reason to believe there is an actor in this game. Would you care to elaborate?
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
nagerous wrote:Fircoal, Priests can only vote except for the hammer. Actors can only hammer. Your story falls short.
I agree. I'm not sure whether this is enough of a scumtell to justify a vote, but you (Fircoal) are contradicting yourself.
Actor is an unimportant town role. If no-one counter's he's telling the truth.
I am, in spite of everything, inclined to believe Fircoal is telling the truth and his mistake doesn't mean much, but just because he's claiming an unimportant role doesn't mean he's telling the truth if not countered. An unimportant, rarely used role would make a pretty good fake claim.
You said you have reason to believe there is an actor in this game. Would you care to elaborate?
Koesen wrote: And how did you get the roles confused if you first said you can only make the last vote and then said you can't hammer? That doesn't sound like Gimpy's mistake but like yours.
Ah, I see I misunderstood you. You mean Gimpy should have warned you about your vote for whatshisname being illegal?
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)