Page 7 of 8
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:44 am
by qeee1
Blastshot wrote: Did nintendo create the proccessor PS3 has? Did it design anything CLOSE to the PS3? Did nintendo make a internet browser capable game system(That i heard during the late development of the system so im assuming its capable)?
Take that bee-otch. lol
By the way who created the 1st online gaming system, other than the comp i mean? I never could figure it out wherever i looked.
Dreamcast maybe? I know the Saturn had an addon "Netlink" or something that allowed for it, but depends on whether you see that as the same. Dreamcast is the first console I can think of that was online calpable from release... at least I think it was.
Also your other points, well I think you missed the point, obviously Nintendo didn't design the PS3. I'm not even sure what you're saying, Sony didn't copy everything about their system? Anyway it wasn't meant to be that serious, people will argue Atari invented the analogue stick etc. It's just remarking how Sony aren't very original. Wii has an online browser.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:52 am
by Blastshot
qeee1 wrote:Blastshot wrote: Did nintendo create the proccessor PS3 has? Did it design anything CLOSE to the PS3? Did nintendo make a internet browser capable game system(That i heard during the late development of the system so im assuming its capable)?
Take that bee-otch. lol
By the way who created the 1st online gaming system, other than the comp i mean? I never could figure it out wherever i looked.
Dreamcast maybe? I know the Saturn had an addon "Netlink" or something that allowed for it, but depends on whether you see that as the same.
Also your other points, well I think you missed the point, obviously Nintendo didn't design the PS3. I'm not even sure what you're saying, Sony didn't copy everything about their system? Anyway it wasn't meant to be that serious, people will argue Atari invented the analogue stick etc. It's just remarking how Sony aren't very original.
Ah yes they are, im not sure but sony took those and put it together 1st because there is no other controller that has the motion sensing,anolog stick,arrowpad(The cross thing, we call it arrowpad). Im not quite sure but i think it was the 1st to have the dualshock and the rest of the stuff. Anyway my point is it made the controller Unique, if its unique it cant be copied of sumthing else.
For the nintendo not desgighning the PS3 i was refering to its no-disctray feature and the rest of its semi-useful doodads that make it idiot proof.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:52 am
by pancakemix
Blastshot wrote:Did nintendo create the proccessor PS3 has?
No, it wasn't designed for that. Its focus is on the motion sensor, not power. That's why they recycled the Gamecube Processor.
Blastshot wrote:Did it design anything CLOSE to the PS3?
Again, no, it's appealing to a broader demographic with something unique, not being a powerhouse
Blastshot wrote:Did nintendo make a internet browser capable game system(That i heard during the late development of the system so im assuming its capable)?
Yes.
Blastshot wrote:By the way who created the 1st online gaming system, other than the comp i mean? I never could figure it out wherever i looked.
The Apple Pippin 
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:55 am
by Blastshot
pancakemix wrote:Blastshot wrote:Did nintendo create the proccessor PS3 has?
No, it wasn't designed for that. Its focus is on the motion sensor, not power. That's why they recycled the Gamecube Processor.
Blastshot wrote:Did it design anything CLOSE to the PS3?
Again, no, it's appealing to a broader demographic with something unique, not being a powerhouse
Blastshot wrote:Did nintendo make a internet browser capable game system(That i heard during the late development of the system so im assuming its capable)?
Yes.Blastshot wrote:By the way who created the 1st online gaming system, other than the comp i mean? I never could figure it out wherever i looked.
The Apple Pippin
Mind telling me this one, im clueless to a nintendo console that you can browse the internet with.(BOLDED TEXT)
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:57 am
by pancakemix
qeee1 wrote:Wii has an online browser.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:59 am
by Blastshot
pancakemix wrote:qeee1 wrote:Wii has an online browser.
Hmm i never knew that. I heard once that nintendo had thought about investing $$ in a online browser but wanted to focus on its new controller. Sweet
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:59 am
by qeee1
Well seems we've gotten into a little point by point rebuttal thing here, so to bring it back to basics, Sony while they have made some hardware advances, aren't exactly the most innovative videogame company (as has been demonstrated) so your initial point that sony is advancing videogames is (relatively) bunk.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:05 am
by Simonov
on simply practical side i think ps2 is best. why you ask? well - you can you it's graphic card to guide missiles.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:19 am
by GreecePwns
If you thought the Wii is good now, imagine how it will be with the games coming out later in the year...i've seen stuff that looks like xbox 360 graphics on the wii.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:24 am
by Blastshot
qeee1 wrote:Well seems we've gotten into a little point by point rebuttal thing here, so to bring it back to basics, Sony while they have made some hardware advances, aren't exactly the most innovative videogame company (as has been demonstrated) so your initial point that sony is advancing videogames is (relatively) bunk.
agreed, we werent getting anywhere. Im a lil brick headed.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:26 am
by Shadowstar
GreecePwns wrote:If you thought the Wii is good now, imagine how it will be with the games coming out later in the year...i've seen stuff that looks like xbox 360 graphics on the wii.
It's a little known fact that the early Wii titles had the graphics of a gamecube game. The up and coming games show what the Wii's graphics can really do.
However, compared to the PS3, its graphics are mediocre. But I don't care too much.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:35 pm
by static_ice
whoever mentioned EGM, that magazine sucks, get Game Informer
Shadowstar wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If you thought the Wii is good now, imagine how it will be with the games coming out later in the year...i've seen stuff that looks like xbox 360 graphics on the wii.
It's a little known fact that the early Wii titles had the graphics of a gamecube game. The up and coming games show what the Wii's graphics can really do.
However, compared to the PS3, its graphics are mediocre. But I don't care too much.
yes, as GI always says (and they're not the only ones), graphics aren't everything, ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:47 pm
by Shadowstar
static_ice wrote:whoever mentioned EGM, that magazine sucks, get Game Informer
Shadowstar wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If you thought the Wii is good now, imagine how it will be with the games coming out later in the year...i've seen stuff that looks like xbox 360 graphics on the wii.
It's a little known fact that the early Wii titles had the graphics of a gamecube game. The up and coming games show what the Wii's graphics can really do.
However, compared to the PS3, its graphics are mediocre. But I don't care too much.
yes, as GI always says (and they're not the only ones), graphics aren't everything, ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
QFT
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:37 pm
by super Mario 009
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:43 pm
by Minister Masket
static_ice wrote:ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
Another point for the PS3! Think MGS4, Haze, God of War 3, Black 2, and all the others. All the 360 has going for it in the near future is Halo 3, talk about putting all your eggs in one basket.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:58 pm
by Shadowstar
Minister Masket wrote:static_ice wrote:ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
Another point for the PS3! Think MGS4, Haze, God of War 3, Black 2, and all the others. All the 360 has going for it in the near future is Halo 3, talk about putting all your eggs in one basket.
Think TP, SMG, MP3, SSBB, and all the others. Plus, most good games for the PS3 aren't console exclusive.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:01 pm
by qeee1
Shadowstar wrote:Minister Masket wrote:static_ice wrote:ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
Another point for the PS3! Think MGS4, Haze, God of War 3, Black 2, and all the others. All the 360 has going for it in the near future is Halo 3, talk about putting all your eggs in one basket.
Think TP, SMG, MP3, SSBB, and all the others. Plus, most good games for the PS3 aren't console exclusive.
Okay, Super Mario Galaxy, Metroid Prime 3, Super Smash Bros Brawl... but what's TP?
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:03 pm
by Shadowstar
qeee1 wrote:Shadowstar wrote:Minister Masket wrote:static_ice wrote:ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
Another point for the PS3! Think MGS4, Haze, God of War 3, Black 2, and all the others. All the 360 has going for it in the near future is Halo 3, talk about putting all your eggs in one basket.
Think TP, SMG, MP3, SSBB, and all the others. Plus, most good games for the PS3 aren't console exclusive.
Okay, Super Mario Galaxy, Metroid Prime 3, Super Smash Bros Brawl... but what's TP?
Twilight Princess (which was a launch title)
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:04 pm
by Minister Masket
Shadowstar wrote:Minister Masket wrote:static_ice wrote:ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
Another point for the PS3! Think MGS4, Haze, God of War 3, Black 2, and all the others. All the 360 has going for it in the near future is Halo 3, talk about putting all your eggs in one basket.
Think TP, SMG, MP3, SSBB, and all the others. Plus, most good games for the PS3 aren't console exclusive.
This is because Sony like to share their games with other consoles, in acts of selflessness.
Any game which is a console exclusive shows that that company is being selfish, and we won't stand for selfishness!
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:07 pm
by Shadowstar
Minister Masket wrote:Shadowstar wrote:Minister Masket wrote:static_ice wrote:ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
Another point for the PS3! Think MGS4, Haze, God of War 3, Black 2, and all the others. All the 360 has going for it in the near future is Halo 3, talk about putting all your eggs in one basket.
Think TP, SMG, MP3, SSBB, and all the others. Plus, most good games for the PS3 aren't console exclusive.
This is because Sony like to share their games with other consoles, in acts of selflessness.
Any game which is a console exclusive shows that that company is being selfish, and we won't stand for selfishness!
Yes, because they were selfless when they stole ideas from nintendo.
Actually, the reason the games aren't verson exclusive are because they are being developed by 3rd parties.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:18 pm
by pancakemix
Minister Masket wrote:Shadowstar wrote:Minister Masket wrote:static_ice wrote:ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
Another point for the PS3! Think MGS4, Haze, God of War 3, Black 2, and all the others. All the 360 has going for it in the near future is Halo 3, talk about putting all your eggs in one basket.
Think TP, SMG, MP3, SSBB, and all the others. Plus, most good games for the PS3 aren't console exclusive.
This is because Sony like to share their games with other consoles, in acts of selflessness.
Any game which is a console exclusive shows that that company is being selfish, and we won't stand for selfishness!
You sound ridiculous. Halo 3 is not the only thing Microsoft has. There are plenty of multi-platform games coming out, and while they're coming to other platforms, it's a safe bet that Microsoft will sell more copies than the others.
Also, Snake's appearance in SSBB speaks volumes.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:04 pm
by Fircoal
qeee1 wrote:We went from arguing which system was to best, to saying the N64 was better than PS2/Xbox/Gamecube/Dreamcast, any of that generation's console. Then we argued what generation of consoles that was, finally settling on 6th. Now we're saying how Fircoal fails in life.
HEY! I DO NOT!
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:11 pm
by Fircoal
Shadowstar wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If you thought the Wii is good now, imagine how it will be with the games coming out later in the year...i've seen stuff that looks like xbox 360 graphics on the wii.
It's a little known fact that the early Wii titles had the graphics of a gamecube game. The up and coming games show what the Wii's graphics can really do.
However, compared to the PS3, its graphics are mediocre. But I don't care too much.
QFT!
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:11 pm
by Fircoal
Shadowstar wrote:static_ice wrote:whoever mentioned EGM, that magazine sucks, get Game Informer
Shadowstar wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If you thought the Wii is good now, imagine how it will be with the games coming out later in the year...i've seen stuff that looks like xbox 360 graphics on the wii.
It's a little known fact that the early Wii titles had the graphics of a gamecube game. The up and coming games show what the Wii's graphics can really do.
However, compared to the PS3, its graphics are mediocre. But I don't care too much.
yes, as GI always says (and they're not the only ones), graphics aren't everything, ultimately the winner of the console wars will be decided by the games
QFT
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:12 pm
by Fircoal