Conquer Club

riskllama wrote:who's "we"?

well, in my case, we is those of us who believe the Russian Federation has an historic and legitimate claim to an uncontested sphere of influence from the Urals to the Channel

other people may have other reasons to adopt the pronoun

saxitoxin wrote:

riskllama wrote:who's "we"?

well, in my case, we is those of us who believe the Russian Federation has an historic and legitimate claim to an uncontested sphere of influence from the Urals to the Channel

other people may have other reasons to adopt the pronoun

yeah right. haha

riskllama wrote:who's "we"?

"we" is the group of people that think trump is a winner because he inherited real state and gets to grab them by the pussy and therefore they have to associate themselves with him.. he loves each and everyone of them and will give them some money and teach them to grab the pussy.

"we" also includes people that see in trump a permission slip for simpletons to blame everything on immigrants and people of different race or religion.

there's also people who sees in trump an opportunity for a denied utopia, they don't see how exactly but he will get the ship there, and they're willing to waste 4-8 years in case he doesn't because they're not directly targeted by any of banon's hate policies.


"we" also cutely believe that trump can say no to big money.

stop fighting, you two.

i'm just slapping him enough to correct his behaviour, like a good parent would. he needs to learn there are consequences to his actions.

Great video of the president-for-life surprising a group of school children on a tour of the White House! It looks like this is in the Center Hall - hilarious to see the portrait of Hillary has been chucked in the basement where she can be forgotten by history.

saxitoxin wrote:Great video of the president-for-life surprising a group of school children on a tour of the White House! It looks like this is in the Center Hall - hilarious to see the portrait of Hillary has been chucked in the basement where she can be forgotten by history.

President Trump taking advantage of white house tours to scout for his next wife.

careful, saxi - you're dangerously close to sounding like a crazy person, just like your Israel thread.

Kim Dot Com has offered to hold a brainstorming session with President Trump, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, and himself about how they can stop the CIA threat.



Trump should just order an artillery battery to set-up five miles outside Langley and have them open up on the place with 155mm HE rounds until the job is done.

lol, told ya...

batshit


What other president immediately alienated the spy network within weeks of inauguration?

They alienated themselves from him when they released fictitious information about him being blackmailed by Russia to try and derail him in the run up to his inauguration. Now he's just repaying the favor.

notyou2 wrote:What other president immediately alienated the spy network within weeks of inauguration?

AKA the people who put Augusto Pinochet in power in Chile, helped overthrow Mohammed Mosaddegh in Iran, who illegally monitor online activities without a warrant, engaged in illegal renditions and torture, whose operatives are currently wanted on arrest warrants in Italy on kidnapping charges, who staged Operation CHAOS, and who have used police state tactics to intimidate anti-war protesters?

Love how, in 90 days, the CIA has gone from the Monster of Mankind - a tumor that needs to be cut-out - to a bunch of sweet ol' grannies who shouldn't be alienated and are just tryin' to do their darndest to protect freedom.

Fortunately civil libertarians like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden aren't buying it, and neither is Trump.

betiko wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

2dimes wrote:Was that not going to happen as soon as they started using robots to spot weld?

Yet here we are with people working more hours than they would have back when everthing would have been made manually in the 1800s.

Granted most of them are in China but you must see what I'm saying.

Robots are not needed to make things for other robots. Without people developing new exciting derailers for mountain bikes, the robots will just make the same thing until someone shuts it off.

"We have too many rotary phones. Thanks for your service."

Well yes...I suppose you can just stick your head in the sand if that's what you want to do.

I hope you're one of the rich guys who won't have to worry about anything once robotics are doing all of the work? If you're not, you're not thinking things through very well...because they'll be the only ones with any recourse, if we don't start changing our perspective on what will allow our society to continue to thrive then.

Any job that can be replaced by a robot isn't a job worth existing anyways. People can find other ways to contribute to society. I don't think all the jobs in 2017 need to still exist in 2037. Things evolve, and there is no big deal in evolving too. My previous job has been replaced by computer algorithms fighting/cooperating with one another.

Robots are already building and repairing robots. Computer programs are already (poorly, but quickly improving) writing computer programs. ANY JOB, yes ANY JOB, can be replaced by a robot...and will be, eventually.

notyou2 wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Any former attorney generals on that list straight up encouraging violence, blood, and death in the streets? Here's one, Obama's Loretta Lynch...
http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-l ... n-streets/

Everything I posted on this page so far is from the last 6 hours

you made me look at that video. you and the header in the link are lying, that's not what she said. but i guess this is the new alternative facts thing.

Scotty's drinking the Kool-Aid again.

What do you mean "again"?

thegreekdog wrote:people need to get out of thinking about politics in an "us" vs. "them" mentality and more on an issue by issue or case by case basis.

It makes me sad that this seems to be the only important political issue that thegreekdog and I agree on these days.

Woodruff wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:people need to get out of thinking about politics in an "us" vs. "them" mentality and more on an issue by issue or case by case basis.

It makes me sad that this seems to be the only important political issue that thegreekdog and I agree on these days.

come on woody.
- You both agree that the clintons are corrupt parasites
- G Dubya wasn't as bad as he was painted to be
- Obomber wasn't an agent for change
- Kittens are cute
- Your political system is broken, and is a pay to play affair

nietzsche wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Any former attorney generals on that list straight up encouraging violence, blood, and death in the streets? Here's one, Obama's Loretta Lynch...
http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-l ... n-streets/

Everything I posted on this page so far is from the last 6 hours

you made me look at that video. you and the header in the link are lying, that's not what she said. but i guess this is the new alternative facts thing.

Nah, she is messaging her soldiers to remind them they need to be prepared to die in the streets.

Phatscotty wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Any former attorney generals on that list straight up encouraging violence, blood, and death in the streets? Here's one, Obama's Loretta Lynch...
http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-l ... n-streets/

Everything I posted on this page so far is from the last 6 hours

you made me look at that video. you and the header in the link are lying, that's not what she said. but i guess this is the new alternative facts thing.

Nah, she is messaging her soldiers to remind them they need to be prepared to die in the streets.

They be dying if soros be paying. ya dig, boy chik?

This is good shit...