Conquer Club

dazza2008 wrote:I just found that whole thing a bit scummy. I don't understand how acting a little scummy to get people to bandwaggon you very unhelpful. Town will always bandwaggon something scummy. I realise it was not the scummiest thing ever but with so many inactives and not a lot to go on it is the best case i see unless we pressure an inactive but that is often not useful at all.

I just don't think the tactic you used would catch scum. I think they would sit back and watch. Scum want to stay out of the limelight and I think if you are not scum they probably have.

pmchugh wrote:

dazza2008 wrote:I just found that whole thing a bit scummy. I don't understand how acting a little scummy to get people to bandwaggon you very unhelpful. Town will always bandwaggon something scummy. I realise it was not the scummiest thing ever but with so many inactives and not a lot to go on it is the best case i see unless we pressure an inactive but that is often not useful at all.

I just don't think the tactic you used would catch scum. I think they would sit back and watch. Scum want to stay out of the limelight and I think if you are not scum they probably have.

Bandwaggons are fantastic for information. The reason for early day 1 BW's is not to lynch or get claims so does it really matter if I am the target? Also to follow your train of thought I would have had to have been trying to wagon MeDeFe failed and then when I seen the vote and post from sheep ignored it (when it was easy to defend), waited a few days and then made up a quite elaborate defence which happened to fit my specific scenario very well. Doesn't that seem unlikely?

pmchugh wrote:I don't like your reasoning. You seem to be taking sides on an argument for the sake of protecting your BW vote rather than genuinely believing I did anything scummy.

vote dazza

TheForgivenOne wrote:Not to switch off of the lovely bickering going back and forth above me, But I have a FoS at Victor. He's made 5 posts so far, and to be honest, his posts were nothing but fluff. 1 was a joke vote on MeDeFe and I, 1 was telling everyone to stfu that he has arrived, 1 was a youtube link, and 2 were bandwagons. 1 was on Pmc, the other on Haggis. Now, I haven't exactly added much, minus defending my actions and a FoS on someone who hasn't posted in the forums in about a week, but his seem a bit weird to me.

dazza2008 wrote:

pmchugh wrote:I don't like your reasoning. You seem to be taking sides on an argument for the sake of protecting your BW vote rather than genuinely believing I did anything scummy.

vote dazza

I do believe that your actions were scummy. I am just not as good as you at presenting what I think.

dazza2008 wrote:I just found that whole thing a bit scummy. I don't understand how acting a little scummy to get people to bandwaggon you very unhelpful. Town will always bandwaggon something scummy. I realise it was not the scummiest thing ever but with so many inactives and not a lot to go on it is the best case i see unless we pressure an inactive but that is often not useful at all.

I just don't think the tactic you used would catch scum. I think they would sit back and watch. Scum want to stay out of the limelight and I think if you are not scum they probably have.

/ wrote:Bah, honestly this game doesn't look like it's going to get much further without a night phase, I say we pressure either Nag or Leitz for not picking up the prod, the later doesn't seem to have done a single thing since confirming, so vote lietz

shieldgenerator7 wrote:Those who have not posted by tomorrow, Sunday, March 25, 2012, at 5:00PM EST will be replaced. If you have posted since the last prod was sent out you are safe, but posting is still recommended.

Also, the person who posts the closest to that time without touching or going over wins a free taco!

Deadline next week sometime unless activity picks up.

-SG7 ( )

pmchugh wrote:The rule should be changed to posting something of worth. If I could vote for 4 people at once I would be.

pmchugh wrote:The rule should be changed to posting something of worth.

zimmah wrote:

pmchugh wrote:The rule should be changed to posting something of worth. If I could vote for 4 people at once I would be.

this post now has a price tag of $0.01 and thereby it's worth something.

nagerous wrote:Fircoal can you tell shieldgenerator to stop sending me spamming e-mails.

crazymilkshake5 wrote:Still need a replacement?